• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways did Henry 8th attempt to extend his influence in European affairs in the year’s 1509-1529?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In what ways did Henry 8th attempt to extend his influence in European affairs in the year's 1509-1529? In the year 1509 Henry 8th succeeded his father Henry 7th to the throne of king of England. During this time many doubts lay to whether a man of Henry 7th's stature could even be compared to any future king of England let alone being compared to a young, inexperienced and what was once said a foolish king like Henry 8th. However Henry made it clear that he had no intention of living under the shadow of his father and his more mature advisors. This decision was foreseen by Henry's early decision to marry Catherine of Aragon and the imprisonment of Epson and Dudley (high treason-extort money for the crown) proved that Henry wasn't a character to mess around with and signaled a turn that he was his own master. It was therefore not surprising that commentators of Henry's time predicted his aggressive energy would become apparent in his dealings abroad with rulers of Europe. Henry was a firm believer in the cause of chivalry and believed the king took the role of being the valiant knight. Thus meant that Henry saw himself being successful at war and although he was inexperienced his education played a vital part in his ambition. Henry's mind was influenced toward the land of France whereby his predecessors before him such as Henry V who won famous victories and whose son had the privilege of being crowned king of France and England acted as models where Henry believed that he to should have the privilege and go even further. ...read more.

Middle

Nevertheless, with Wolsey around he limited the amount of promotion through the hierarchical structure of "the chain of great being" a secured the throne for Henry. This was done, as Wolsey wasn't born in the royal family therefore for that reason Henry knew he had no claim to the throne and could never have challenged Henry to the kingdom. Despite his brilliance Wolsey wasn't experienced in foreign affairs and had to compete with the well-established experts of Louis's advisors. However, even Wolsey knew that this treaty was to be taken as no more then a bluff between two ancient counter parts. In the proceedings of Henry's domestic affairs the relations in the international scene had changed dramatically. France's king Louis XII had died and was succeeded by his nephew Francis I. Like Henry, Francis was talented, educated, and was a young King. A clash between two personalities was sensed here. This rival started by Francis challenging Henry and calling him a "young buccaneer of Europe" and by secretly marrying Henry's sister Mary with her lost love The Duke Of Suffolk. This was now twice marriage was granted without permission to which caused humiliation to Henry. With the proceedings of Mary fledging away the rest of Europe made way for another "king on the block." Charles V. Succeeded from his father Ferdinand of Spain in 1516 Charles was also continuing the pattern of young fortune with himself only being 15 yrs. Old. Ferdinand added the existing Spanish kingdoms to his burgundian lands whereby Charles also took the role of Maximillian who had also passed his time. ...read more.

Conclusion

Wolsey came to an end in 1529 where he was beheaded. Henry's influence in foreign affairs is said to be in dominance of Cardinal Wolsey. He was a man of great ability and when given a task he was sired to complete it to the best of his ability. It was said that that the relationship between the two was not that of a king and servant but of something else. Henry gave the task to Wolsey and Wolsey completed this, and from time to time matters had to be taken into his own hands because of the stress it would cause Henry. Wolsey was headed in 1529 because of the one promise he failed to reach which was the kingdom of France. It is said that this was never achieved because of the economic and political situation, which Wolsey couldn't control and therefore cannot be treated as his fault. Considering the circumstances England's foreign policy was considerably successful. Not only was Henry recognised equally amongst greater powers in Europe but also he gained the status in Europe he needed. However, Henry's main aim was the capture of French territory and if this wasn't to be achieved his policy was considered as a failure. From a negative point of view no land was gained apart from the minor town of Tournai, which had no real value except its recognition. This makes you wonder would Henry had sacrificed his other foreign policy objectives for the land of France? Rajpal Singh Bal Mr. Graham History Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    To fix what Henry considered a personal disgrace, in 1513 he started another campaign against France. It was Wolsey who masterminded this expedition, making sure that the troops were well equipped etc. But Henry personally led this invasion; emulating what he considered to be the ideal king; 10th century Richard Lionheart, or King Arthur and his knights.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29?

    4 star(s)

    he could meet the King and they could discuss the activities of the week. Wolsey could not be as influential on the King as much as he wanted to. He knew the courtiers could and would influence Henry's favour in opposition to Wolsey.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing Ltd., 1999. A useful resource in regards to items relating to Joan's military career. Particular attention is paid to her capabilities as a leader and the growing jealousy of Charles and his court. While previous works have concentrated on her religious and feminist feats, this text addresses the issue of how she became successful militarily.

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    Hope this helps. Submitted by: David Tutty, (Age 16) English > Q. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings about prejudice and inequality ? In 'Charlotte O'Neil's Song' the poet describes all the differences in lifestyle between the rich and the servants.

  1. the perfect lie

    Was this true? What Aunt Mary said could it be true? I thought in my confused head "Are they really dead?" Charles burst out of curiosity. All I could think about was our future and who's going to look after us?

  2. To what extent did Wolsey seek to reform the church? Although Wolsey did have ...

    Also in 1512 Act of Parliament had cut back the issue of benefit of clergy, but it was due for renewal in 1515. Wolsey managed to avoid this, but only because he knelt before Henry at Baynard's Castle in November 1515 to reassure the king that clerical privileges were no threat to royal power over the church.

  1. Who controlled English foreign affairs in 1515-1529 - Henry or Wolsey?

    The likelihood of real English commitment waxed and waned and Wolsey was still in quest of peace with France when France was defeated at Pavia, the natural response was then to propose alliance with Charles to take advantage of France's weakness.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    destabilized his reign at any point, if at all in his last seven years alive. Also to classify which one was the most important contributing factor. This investigation is based on Henry VIII because of my motivation and passion for the subject, my enjoyment for analysing historical topics and other certain events from history.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work