• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In why the United States withdrew its' forces in 1973

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Julia Cloke Explain why the United States withdrew its' forces in 1973 America's involvement in a war in Vietnam began just after World War Two. America was not prepared to leave Vietnam open to Communist control, as Ho Chi Minh, the leader of the time, had strong ties to the Soviet Union, America's nemesis. The Domino Theory was the fear that drove them. If one country fell to communism, all the countries around it would soon enough fall too. Yet somewhere along the line this fear became too little a reason to win the war. After millions of US dollars had been ploughed into Vietnam, a peak of 600,000 US troops and thousands of tonnes of weapons, America could still not win this war. Where did it all go wrong? Although in the minds of the American Government, there was a just and profound reason for their involvement in Vietnam, to the Vietnamese civilians these men were nothing more than invaders. These invaders often did not speak the language, or made little effort to do so. This was not their country; it was not their war. The soldiers had an unfamiliar appearance to the Vietnamese. They marched into towns and villages promising the civilians safety, yet it was their presence that brought war and constant conflict. They had come uninvited, from a country few Vietnamese had been to. They were worlds apart from the life in Vietnam, these men who smoked and carried guns. The American troops never really got to know the Vietnamese as they interacted with them very little and tended to spend most of their time with fellow soldiers in American bases. The soldiers did not know of the people's lives, their routine, their fears. To them, the Vietnam was new and exciting, a place where America could walk away holding the flag of peace and honour. Yet for the Vietnamese civil conflict had been going on for decades before and each person had their own disasters that had touched their lives. ...read more.

Middle

The images they saw though were completely unexpected, as the brutal reality of war was slowly revealed. The public saw the harsh realities of dead Vietnamese civilians and the disastrous effects that the US bombing programme was causing. Whenever US troops stormed a village to hunt down the Vietcong, only a few paces behind them were the cameras, risking their lives to inform the American public. Innocent lives were daily affected, as broadcasters did not hold back on any details, even showing live deaths as US soldiers lined up Vietcong fighters and shot each one in the head with a single bullet. The American people were horrified. They had not known the full extent of war until they had seen these images. Images of dead civilians, burning villages and little success brought shame to the American public. They could not believe the appalling way US troops were treating fellow human beings and the inhuman ways of killing thousands. Of course, the people had heard about the new, advanced weaponry that America possessed and that they had started to use it in Vietnam. The one thing they did not know, however, was the sheer strength of these weapons and the true extent of their destruction. Agent Orange was a highly toxic defoliant that was sprayed using aeroplanes over the vast area of jungle in Vietnam. America did this in the hope that the Vietcong would run out of safe, jungle environment to take refuge in and would be easier to hunt down in the open air. What the people weren't prepared for was the effects of toxins on the land. It decreased the yield of crops, making many of them too rotten to eat. Those that were edible were highly contaminated with toxins, which quickly found their way into the bloodstream. As the level of toxins rose inside the civilians it caused adverse effects such as abnormal childbirth. ...read more.

Conclusion

It may have been 4 years of talks and promises, but Nixon had finally succeeded and given the people what they wanted. Although during the aftermath of Vietnam it had looked like America had pulled out because they were loosing and felt they could not win, recent historians have analysed new sources and are reaching new conclusions. Before it was thought that the Tet Offensive was a major loss for America, but today we now know that the North thought themselves it was a failure. They lost many of their key fighters during the campaign and had far superior losses than America. Some historians also doubt whether public opinion really had an influence on America's withdrawal. It is now thought that it was in fact the sheer cost of the war that forced America to reconsider and that most of the US public was actually pro the war, despite what old polls may suggest. We may never know the truth, but it has emerged that everything is not as clear-cut as it may have first seemed. In conclusion I believe the American public did most likely have an effect of the decisions made by the Government, as it was such a power force that it must have had some influence. I do think, however, that it was not all bad for America. They did not loose the Tet Offensive, but neither did they win it. This lack of obvious progress was the key feature in the decisions of the Government, as I feel that no-one would want to fight a war they were getting nowhere in. I do agree, it must have cost them a great deal to get nowhere in the war, but it cannot have been purely due to monetary costs as America still supplied the south with weapons that must have cost vast quantities. We will never know, but what we do know is that it definitely made American history. Being the only war America has ever lost, it leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of those who fought. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. WHAT WERE THE CAUSES OF THE YOM KIPPUR WAR OF 1973?

    This meant that Israel received 50% more land than what was originally allocated to them by the UN. This further motivated the Arab nations to pursue their mission of eradicating Israel, the most aggressive of all the Arab leaders Nasser of Egypt demonstrated this intention and belief first.

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    that the US, in the first Gulf War, overestimated the strength of the Iraqi forces and then overestimated the damage inflicted against the Iraqi military.78 Conclusion Iraq and Iran are dangers to world peace and don't warrant the benefit of doubt.

  1. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    many more Vietnamese peasants joined the rebellion. This meant that the Americans were facing opposition in their own bases as well as in the jungles and in the South. "A mortar shell lands right in the middle of the patrol.

  2. Post-Cold War Realities

    Iran is now stronger and more powerful than its new neighbours and no longer vulnerable to conventional intimidation or threats from that direction. A result of the fact that it is now an autonomous middle power, capable of permeating the power vacuum in predominantly Islamic central Asia and the Caucasus,

  1. America In Vietnam, 1953-73

    and the land given to the peasantry who lived in 40 000 co-operatives. This new arrangement removed the age-old threat of starvation from the peasantry as production increased. In SV no land was redistributed by Diem's gov't, actually land given by the Vietminh to the peasantry was taken back so that 15% of the population owned 75% of the land.

  2. Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and the 1960s? ...

    They also used this tactic as they do not mind waiting a long time before winning the war whereas the Americans did so they could just sit back while the Americans became more agitated and intensified the search for them, thus enlarging the chances of them falling for the Vietcong traps.

  1. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    America claimed that their presence in Vietnam was for the aid of the people, terrorised by the communist north. It has always been clear that the threat of communism spreading across south east Asia was a great worry for capitalist America, therefore America's key motive has often seemed to be the fight against 'evil' communism.

  2. Did the TET offensive (1968) impact the conflict in Vietnam

    According to an outside source, HistoryCentral, ?The Vietnam War was an important factor in bringing down the American Economy from the growth and affluence of the 1960s to the economic crisis in the 1970s?. Politicians and the public were worried that the USA could not manage to finance the war for much longer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work