• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

International Relations Assess the arguments for and against the proliferation of nuclear weapons

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Euan R. Clark International Relations Assess the arguments for and against the proliferation of nuclear weapons. IR2003 Michel Torsten 2151 words Introduction This essay will mainly look at the arguments from two of the present day's most prolific thinkers on the subject of nuclear weapons (NWs). The main subject matter for this essay will come from The Spread of Nuclear Weapons a joint effort by both of these thinkers. It will look firstly to the arguments of Kenneth Waltz: realist thinker and proponent of the argument in favour of nuclear weapons. Secondly there is a discursion to the arguments of Scott Sagan: anti-proliferation thinker and extensive writer on the subject. Lastly the essay looks at some of Sagan's arguments from other publications in a critical show of how his reasoning is not as robust as he would like us to think. A Case in favour of Nuclear Weapons i) The Defensive Ideal - dissuasion through defense. Waltz, the realist, argues that "more may be better" in his article under that title. He claims a certain 'military logic of self-help systems.'1 In holding with the realist tradition, it is due to the anarchic system of states and the principle of self-help within this system, it is providing security which is the individual state's 'most important way of helping itself.'2 Similarly, building "...defenses so patently strong that no one will try to destroy or overcome them would make international life perfectly tranquil."3 ii) ...read more.

Middle

Sagan holds that objective aims of the state are belittled by such stimuli and have their main focus on internal matters, rather than on external threats to national security. Consequentially, a government under such (strong) military persuasion has its "professional competence as a fighting force"18 Organisation at highest levels not always rational The crux of Sagan's argument lies in his view of the matter from an "organisational perspective"19 and forms the basis for the rest of his main argument. He says that two topics in organisational theory mar the view that those in charge of NWs (chiefly government and military organisations) are purely rational in their organisational behaviour. Such institutions use simplified models to understand the more complex 'outside world'. They also do not use distinct or discrete rational decisions, rather that they use standardised and formalised procedure to deal with the necessity of coordinating their internal activities. They 'satisfice' ('the finding and accepting of the first option that is minimally satisfying') rather than find the most agreeable course of action. Also, the gathering of information is not done from a 'complete' basis, rather it tends to be done in regard to the researcher's past areas of experience, training and responsibilities. He goes on to say that factors such as internal politics and the type of language used within such organisations is important in constructing how that organisation views any particular ...read more.

Conclusion

In doing so I also hope to have shown how he has weakened his own stance by looking at the problem from behind the main stage. He has veered away from the main issues at hand, and instead focused on issues that may have an effect on our conceptualization of the use of NWs, but do not hold a conclusive show of evidence that might suggest that we do not really need NWs. In short, his arguments are strong, but have more to do with the logistcs and management of NW systems/organizations than do issues affecting the present need for NWs. Bibliography Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Riker, W, H., An assessment of the Merits of Selective Nuclear Proliferation, Journal of Conflict Resolution 26, no. 2, June 1982. Evans, G., & Newnham, J., The Penguin Dictionary of International Relations, Penguin Reference, London, 1998. Freedman, L., The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy, 3rd Edit., Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 2003. Sagan, S., The Commitment Trap, Commitment Trap: Why The United States Should Not Use Nuclear Threats to Deter Biological and Chemical Weapons Attacks, Internatioanl Security, Volume 24, Number 4, 1 April 2000 Sagan, S., The Problem of Redundancy Problem: Why More Nuclear Security Forces May Produce Less Nuclear Security, Risk Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2004 Waltz, K., and Sagan, S., The Spread of Nuclear Weapons, A Debate Renewed, W.W. Norton and Co., New York, USA / London, UK, 2003. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    as those in the West since the USSR didn't have the resources to provide financial aid to the countries of Eastern Europe. Stalin saw the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan as part of an America plan for world domination.

  2. The world would be a better place without nuclear energy. What do we use ...

    Surely we can use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. No acid rain, end our reliance fossil fuels, and be a cheap source of power. Nuclear reactors can pump out much more power than a coal power station and they only use a tiny amount of fuel.

  1. Does the issue of nuclear proliferation still matter in world politics today?

    Although nuclear weapons have been detonated on adversaries only twice-against Japan in World War II, but states have continued to pursue their development for a wide range of reasons: as a deterrent to attack by others, in the hope that they will never actually be used in combat; as an

  2. Armed forces.

    Nazis formed by Hitler 1921 Irish Civil War (1921 - 24); Australia given mandate over German New Guinea Spanish war against Berbers (1921 - 26) Charlie Chaplin's The Kid Marconi makes first Radio Broadcast 1922 Transjordan and Palestine administered by Britain; Egyptian Independence BBC founded USSR formed Joyce's Ulysses; Tutankhamun's

  1. Should Britain eliminate its nuclear arsenal?

    MccGwire consolidates this by pointing out that we no longer live in a bi-polar system. Thus the existence of a multi-polar system with one or two more players would sharply increase the future probability of inadvertent or accidental war (MccGwire, 1994, pg225).

  2. Why did the superpowers find it possible to reduce their nuclear arsenals in the ...

    Furthermore, as A.J.C Edwards pointed out, "Even if the political will had been there on both sides to make major concessions, the crucial problems of verification and enforcement remained intractable, especially as the Soviets were equivocal about on-site inspection2". Mutual distrust between both states remained too profound for both parties

  1. History of the United States

    Meanwhile, reconstructed southern state governments enacted many reforms, establishing free public schools for all, popular election of all officials, more equitable taxes, and more humane penal laws. Republican Ulysses S. Grant was elected president in 1868 with electoral votes gained in occupied southern states.

  2. Do nuclear weapons have any use as instruments of deterrence or are they just ...

    dangerous situation- with in 1955 the world facing a stand off between N.A.T.O (North Atlantic Treaty Operation) and members of the Warsaw pact (Soviet union) (Scott.2001,p.81).However, instead of these organizations resorting to war the threat of a nuclear conflict forced compliance between the two super powers through treaties such as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work