• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Interpretations of Cromwell's actions at Drogheda - Explain how Cromwell's actions at Drogheda have been interpreted (viewed) in different ways.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Interpretations of Cromwell's actions at Drogheda Explain how Cromwell's actions at Drogheda have been interpreted (viewed) in different ways. Explain why Cromwell's actions at Drogheda have been interpreted (viewed) in different ways. In 1649, Cromwell arrived in Ireland. He entered the town to fight. 3, 000 people were killed in that fight. Many innocent children, women and priest died. Cromwell killed and won. In the following paragraph I will be talking about what sources A-D say and weather they are reliable or not. These sources re for Cromwell. Source A, this source is a picture, this picture shows Irish Catholics killing protestants on a bridge over a river, on the river you can see, dead protestants floating at the top and at the side of the river you can see priest holding crosses. This picture was printed in London by an English protestant in 1641. ...read more.

Middle

This source is unreliable because again it is a letter from Cromwell to parliament and Cromwell wanted to impress parliament. Source D says, Cromwell was write there was no more fighting, all the other towns surrendered. This source is reliable because it is written by a modern historian and is likely to know what he/she is talking about. Modern Historians do lots of research from books, internet, etc. In the following paragraph I will be talking about what sources E-H say and whether they are reliable or not. These sources are against Cromwell. Source E says, the Irish had done something wrong to the lives of poor Protestants. He is persuaded that it is the righteous judgement of god upon the barbarous wretches. This source is unreliable because, Cromwell thinks he is god, because in the text he says "I am persuaded that this is a righteous judgement of god upon the barbarous wretches." ...read more.

Conclusion

So Charles II would not like him so obviously Charles friend won't like him, so he would lie Source H says, Cromwell failed, he still killed 2, 000 more people, so he was wrong by saying in source C that, killing these 1, 000 people, this will prevent me from killing more in other towns. This source is reliable because it is written by a modern Irish historian and is likely to know what he/she is talking about, because the do plenty of research before hand. Source B and source G disagree about what happened at Drogheda. Source B was written by Cromwell but source G was written by a friend of Charles II. They would not agree because Cromwell killed Charles I at the end of the Civil war. So Charles I wouldn't like him, and if Charles II didn't like him then obviously Charles friend wouldn't like him. I would find sources D,F and H. Waseem Shafiq 4/30/2007 Page 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Oliver Cromwell - Hero or Villain?

    All this (you may think) may not make him a villain, but it certainly doesn't make him a HERO! In 1653, Oliver Cromwell accepted the title "Lord Protector." This made him the official ruler of England, as England was then a Republic.

  2. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    Many people have said that Cromwell was a killjoy. But, he was not one. Cromwell played practical jokes on women on a party and he loved dancing and singing. He took part in signing a treaty to ban Christmas and Easter.

  1. History Independant study - Oliver Cromwell

    Cromwell had the control over the army because they believed in what he was doing, stamping out the revolutionary forces and trying to restore some peace. Also getting rid of a tyrannical King and everything he stood for in an effort to restore peace back to the country.

  2. Oliver Cromwell.

    In 1628, at the age of 29, he was the MP for Huntingdon. He had though that he 'had moved from darkness into light'. He thought that this was a powerful religious experience for him. In 1629, after 1 year in the depths of Parliament, the kind had parliament dissolved by telling members to 'go home'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work