• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Interpretations of The First World War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

This is my essay on the interpretations of The First World War. I will be giving my interpretations on the sources A to H we have been given. I will explain what type of source it is, whether it is a primary or secondary source and then how useful it would be for a study of the Western Front in World War One... Source A has been taken from an English textbook that was published in 1995. It is a piece of writing about what would happen when you enlisted and what would happen if you if you tried to commit cowardice and mutiny. It seems to be a secondary source because it has been written by someone who was not at the war at the time and he/she will have selected the most solid sources that are genuine and trustworthy. It has obviously been created by an expert because it has been taken from a school textbook. Source B is a postcard that had been published by the British government for soldiers to send home to their families. It is black and white and has a picture of a soldier leant against a trench wall dreaming of his home. It also has a poem called A Soldiers Love Song. This is definitely a primary source because it was there at the war when it was going on and they will have been used by the soldiers. It portrays the soldier being happy but this was very untrue. It put a false face on the war for the relatives and loved ones back at home. Source C is a painting called Paths To Glory which was painted by someone called C.R Nevinson who served the Red Cross during the First World War. It was apparently draw in 1917 and it wasn't allowed to be shown until after the war was over. It shows two soldiers lying face down in a ditch. ...read more.

Middle

This source does have some advantages but it has quite a lot of disadvantages. It does give a clear and accurate picture of the uniforms and weapons used by soldiers at the time. It also gives a good clue about what the trenches looked like although it is missing the grizzly bits like the huge spools of sharp razor wire and the rags of clothing where people have tried to siege the trench but were in vain in doing so. The source disadvantages are that it doesn't give that good a pictorial description of the war. It paints a false picture over the event to calm and settle the nerves of the soldier's friends and relatives. It isn't and can't be biased because it isn't an eyewitness account, nor does it have an account on it, just a simple poem called "A Soldiers Love Song." This source is half-and-half about whether you can trust it or not. It is good to have for reference to uniforms and weapons but is decisively bad on things like the war description. Instead of showing the murky skies, bombs, desolation and carnage, it puts a false and happy face as if there is no violence at all. It is not a good source to see what conditions in battle were like but it is good for what soldiers and their inventory looked like. This would not be a good source to have in a study of World War One. Source C is a painting called Paths to Glory. It was painted by someone called C.R Nevinson who served the Red Cross during World War One. It was illustrated in 1917 but it wasn't exhibited until after the war for obvious reasons. This is because it has two soldiers who have been fatally wounded face down in a ditch. Their clothing is all ragged and loose so they must have taken a hard landing. ...read more.

Conclusion

This probably means that this source is quite reliable. This source is quite disturbing if you read it because with only five minutes to zero hour he was killed by being shot in the head. It is probably the most awful and gruesome way to die. This source is quite reliable because there are a few key points, which suggest that it could be an eyewitness report and it has lots of detail regarding Wilfred Neville's death. This means that it could be very useful in a study of World War One. The disadvantages with this source are that it is an anonymous piece of writing. This means that someone could have made this death up because maybe the real reason may have been much more painful and gruesome. Plus if it is an anonymous piece of writing, then anybody could have written it and just made up a reason for his death so his family wouldn't have to question what happened to him. This would make it much easier for them not having to worry about what happened. However, all in all, this is a good source to have for a study of World War One because it sounds like the writer (whoever he is) was an eyewitness to the event. It is also pretty solid evidence because it has been very hard to pick holes in it. So this is a good source for a study on World War One. Most of the sources I was given were quite good. Most would be handy in a study on World War One because the evidence showed that they were pretty solid. Some however weren't too good. You could tell some sources weren't too good just by looking at them e.g.: the cigarette advert which was a piece of propaganda and some just didn't contain enough evidence and detail e.g.: the News of the World extract. Thank you for reading my essay. I hope you have enjoyed it and it has been of some use to you. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Does the film 'The Battle of The Somme' provide us with a realistic picture ...

    3 star(s)

    In addition various sources imply that food was often stolen because soldiers were so hungry. Overall I feel that the evidence clearly indicates that the film provides quite a realistic view of the amount of Equipment and Supplies because more sources agree that the British had enough supplies and plenty of firearms.

  2. The First World War was a new type of war. It brought about horrific ...

    The Battle was between ships 15 kilometres away from each other. The Germans had an advantage over the British as their gunners were more accurate and their shells more destructive, and the British ships had thinly armoured gun turrets. At this battle the British lost 14 ships, 3 of them powerful cruisers, and 6000 men killed.

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    insecurity" � "we have here a political force committed fanatically to the belief that with US there can be no permanent modus vivendi" � spread of communism was the greatest danger to the free world, not Soviet army � communism is a "malignant parasite which feeds only on diseased tissue"

  2. The First World War

    Out of all of these reasons the American entry into the war seems like one of the most important reasons why the deadlock was broken. In 1917 America was emerging as the world's superpower however at this time the British Empire was the world's superpower.

  1. In What Ways Did The First World War Affect The Lives Of People At ...

    into bars, restaurants and anywhere that they wanted without fear of being punished. The Military Service Act was a major turning point in the war for everyone whether male or female, child or elder it really did not matter. All that matters is that everyone had to go into total

  2. Citizen Soldier.

    At the same time there was a man by the name of Bill Gates that was writing an operating system he called DOS or the disk operating system. He signed deals with companies such as IBM. Bill Gates founded Microsoft and is now the richest man in the world.

  1. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    People saw the bomb as a lifesaver, not destroyer. This bomb would mean an end to the hand-to-hand combat currently being used on the Japanese islands. Rather than letting the war drag on and let many more die, the Americans felt it was their duty to kill many Japanese at once in order to save many more.

  2. Britain and the First World War.

    The Americans entry only brought an extra 2 million men in to Europe to fight in the trenches but these men gave a chance for allied soldiers who were tired and had been fighting for 3 years already a chance to rest.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work