• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Irish Reform between 1829-1840 was limited. How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


Reform between 1829-1840 was limited. How far do you agree with this statement? The early 19th century marked a great turning point in how Ireland would be governed in the future, no longer were the needs of the Irish Catholics being overlooked by Protestant landlords who cared little for the people. Daniel O?Connell the ?Great Emancipator? had opened the started the landslide of new reforms when he had secured his position in parliament. However events such as the aftermath of the Emancipation Act and the Tithe War showed that this reform that occurred was really having little effect on the violence and unrest that was occurring in Ireland at the time. However the Emancipation Act and the number of further reforms later that followed it showed this new freedom was really pushing the boundaries of what Irish Catholics could do and giving rights back to the Irish finally. The Roman Catholic Emancipation Act of 1829 really pushed the boundaries of what was acceptable at the time in British politics. For the first time ever the British government had given an Irish Roman Catholic a seat in Parliament which showed that O?Connell reforming and campaigning was really reforming Irish rights giving Irish people the right to stand as an MP legally due to the alteration of the Oath of Supremacy. ...read more.


This was also another example of long term change and showed that reforms were not limited during this period as the Irish were experiencing freedoms they had never experienced before under British control. As well as these acts being introduced, with the overthrow of the Tory party a new Irish-Whig alliance was formed creating a new Irish political powerhouse that actually had influence in parliament. Coupled with the fact that in 1833 there were 39 O’Connellite MP’s, it showed that there was a serious amount of reform and newly found freedom in this period as only 4 years Irish people were not being represented at all in parliament. On the other hand, the reform that took place during this period had some limitations; this included the way in which some British politicians acted after the Act. This included the new £10 household suffrage which was seen by many as an act of political spite against O’Connell, this act limited the amount of people in Ireland who could vote and showed that although the Emancipation Act passed there were still other ways in which disgruntled British politicians could get back at the Catholic Association. ...read more.


This showed that the reforms that occurred did not change much in the long run and that there was always going to be unrest and violence in Ireland. In conclusion, the reforms were not limited as they paved the way for further changes and campaigns in order to give the Irish Catholics more freedom. This was shown in the increase of pro-O?Connell MP?s that were able to participate in parliament and the ability for Irish people to hold nearly any position in British government. It also showed the flexibility of the British government as they were able to alter the Oath of Supremacy and allow Irish MP?s into government, showing that the reforms were not limited at all. However even though there was some violence in Ireland and there were some civil liberties taken away from the Irish, this did not last long and this unrest would always occur as long as the British had any presence in Ireland as shown in the centuries of Irish violence that had occurred before the Emancipation Act and the further reforms. Although these reforms had some downsides, the overall effect was positive and showed that the reforms were not limiting in the long run. Alex Law 13B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays


    This aggressive statement was the start of Peel's more repressive policy in Ireland. The Irish Arms act of 1843, which gave the Authorities in Ireland greater powers and banned Catholics from owning guns, was very stringent and can therefore be considered repressive, but it can be seen that it was

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    It disenfranchised 56 boroughs, among them the so called rotten boroughs which had little or a very small population and pocket boroughs where the number of representatives had been controlled by aristocratic land owners. The parliamentary representation of other boroughs was ended, while that of a number of large towns generally increased.

  1. Changes in Crime and Punishment.

    And that he got the local gentry and clergy involved and worked to get the Parliament to pass the Gloucestershire Act in 1785. The Act allowed them to buy land and employ trained staff. (ii) From the source it can be seen that there were a number of factors that

  2. History Of Framlingham Castle

    Well in order to answer this question you must first break the question down and define it. So the first important word within this question is use meaning uses meaning how the castle was used. The next one is a lot being that this means more then once.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work