• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is There Still an Imperial Presidency?

Extracts from this document...


IS THERE STILL AN IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY? Writers of the constitution intended for congress to be the most powerful branch of government. They invested in the president: the powers of the monarch, but subjected him to the democratic principles of accountability which was ensured by a complex system of parliamentary and judicial checks and balances. For over a century the US got along fine with a relatively weak president whose major role was simply to carry out the laws and policies made by congress, however, there has been erosion in this system. Presidential power only started to grow after the 19th century when the US set out on its path to empire. A great transformation of the president's power came with Franklin D. Roosevelt. When he came into office in 1933, he declared the great depression1 a national emergency and announced that he would treat the depression as a war. Although congress did not approve of this, he still presided over the nation. Roosevelt also stayed in office for more than four terms until his death in 1945. His forceful leadership and many years in office inspired a term, 'the imperial presidency' that would be applied to subsequent president with similar leadership style. Imperial means one that is superior in authority or acting like an emperor. ...read more.


Terrorism is a crime against humanity and as such should be treated as a criminal offence and should be dealt with by the police. President W. Bush declaring war on terrorism without the approval of congress is unconstitutional and it is an abuse of power. The war in my opinion was infused with the spirit of seeking unilateral American dominance. President Bush's policies on foreign affairs are examples of his arrogance of power; telling President Yasser Arafat to step down or telling the Palestinians they cannot vote for Arafat, the war on terrorism, the invasion on Iraq and deposing Iraq's Saddam Hussein are unconstitutional because congress did not approve of it. It is unprecedented in the history of any democratic nation, thus taking it back to the colonial era. And by these actions, he is acting as an imperial president. There have, of course, been occasions when a sitting President has assumed war making powers with little regard for the views of Congress or the general public. US forces were already involved in Vietnam when Lyndon Johnson engineered the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution of 1964, and George Bush Senior agreed in a two-day Senate debate on US intervention in the Persian Gulf, but George W. Bush has surpassed his predecessors in the assumption of imperial powers--most obviously, perhaps, in his tendency to conflate America's war against terrorism with his own existential destiny. ...read more.


The issue of imperial presidency is some worth similar to George Orwell's famous book; "the animal farm" where there was a search and desperate need for a perfect leader who is unbiased and would follow the lay-down rules of the founding fathers. But each time they get deceived into voting in the wrong person no leader can ever be perfect and when put in such great place of power seize to make best use if not exceed the boundaries of the power. This is why Congress has to place a check and balance on presidency, the leniency of congress is becoming a course for concern. When congress gave Lyndon B. Johnson a free hand to do whatever he believed was necessary in Southeast Asia, the result was the deadly Vietnam War that ripped America apart. Now congress is being extra indulgent with the bush administration. The people should show their resentment to the imperial presidency. Also election should be done justly so that the fluke that put Bush into administration doesn't occur again. If congress and the judiciary can put a proper check like that of Nixon's or Ronald Reagan's regime, congress would acquire its rightful position in the balance of power and the democratic nation which the founding fathers intended for would be derived. 1 Fight against communism 2 About 2,400 detainees being held by US military troops ?? ?? ?? ?? ISI INEGBENIKI ISI Page 1 10/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    northern areas in Iraq.66 Ballistic Missile Programme The Security Council required Iraq to unconditionally accept the destruction, removal or rendering harmless, under international supervision, of all ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150 kilometres and related major parts, and repair and production facilities under Security Council Resolution 687 (1991).

  2. Ronald Wilson Reagan still found a way to change the face of the United ...

    Reagan eventually became the president of the Screen Actors Guild, and this experience prompted him to develop an interest in politics. Reagan began his political career as an active Democrat. He admired Franklin D. Roosevelt and supported other Democrats such as, Harry Truman.

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    Gradually the government saw all of its reforms either criticized for being too radical or not being reformist enough. Concurrently, in the republics nationalists movements had begun to emerge revealing, in some areas, widespread anti- Russian sentiments. One such outburst ocurred in December 1986 in Alma Ata in Kazakhastan, however,

  2. 3 presidents

    It becomes quite clear that it was him who got the Canal worker to start the revolution. Although it may seem this is wrong and unjust for the acts of a president, it did get the US the canal; which helped immensely in the near future to come.

  1. In What Ways Were Britain's Imperial Policies Before 1952 Influenced By The Development Of ...

    The imperial policies pursued in the years up to 1952 were intended to prevent further erosion of her great power status and reverse the nation's decline. The Middle East and East Mediterranean were areas of vital British interest due to Soviet power being much closer and Soviet influence more likely

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    The growing working class in Philadelphia and New York City turned against the Federalists' elitism. By 1800 the ethnic minorities of the Middle Atlantic states helped swing that region behind Jefferson, a Virginian, and his Democratic-Republican party, giving the presidency to Jefferson.

  1. History of the United States

    In 1860 the political system became completely fragmented. The Democrats split into northern and southern wings, presenting two different candidates for the presidency; the small CONSTITUTIONAL UNION PARTY attempted to rally the former Whigs behind a third. The Republicans, however, were able to secure the election of Abraham LINCOLN to the White House.

  2. George Walker Bush.

    Education policy named 'No Child Left Behind', includes mandatory national testing and some support for school vouchers. It also makes high school academic records available to military recruiters. Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and other domestic fields is claimed to decrease dependence on oil imports, particularly from the Middle East.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work