• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A-F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United Statesduring the late 1960s and early 1970s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A-F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s? By 1967 a national movement against the war had developed. Some of the opposition came from socialists or radicals who sympathized with the Vietnamese and wanted to help create a united, independent, Vietnam. Pacifists were also against the war because they believe that all war is wrong. Other people just believed that the war was not worth the lives of American men. The Vietnam War was mainly a media war shown on television, heard on radio and read in the newspapers. The USA needed the support of its people to win this war and the media was turning them against it. TV showed prisoners being tortured and executed and women and children watching their house burning to the ground. Pictures showed the affects of napalm and the American public was horrified. All of these things fueled the anti-war movement. People began to draft dodge and staged demonstrations. At Kent State University four students were killed by the National Guard and this shocked the public. The war was making the USA increasingly unstable. The one event that had a particularly devastating effect on American and international support for the war was the Mai Lai Massacre. ...read more.

Middle

Its intended audience was the US public and this would have an influence on the anti-war movement in America. It is sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the USA because it was at the time of the movement and it fueled it. It is primary evidence and this is important, as if it was not then it could not have contributed to the movement. However we do not know who or how many people saw it. This is a weakness because if not many people saw it then it would not have had much affect on the anti-war movement. It is also biased against the war and the US government so people may have not taken it seriously. Source D is a cartoon that was published in the British magazine punch in 1967. It shows the effects of President Johnson's war policy on the 'Great society'. You can see a train moving along and this is the US economy. The carriages are the great society but they are being chopped up and burnt in the fire on the train to fuel it. The 'great society' is fueling the US economy. 1967 is before the big anti-war movement and this means that it could have contributed to it. ...read more.

Conclusion

This appalled them and the effects lasted for generations. Another reason was guerilla tactics were frustrating and the war lasted for such a long time that soldiers started giving up hope of ever winning the war. People saw many civilian targets and this was not what they wanted. They saw houses being burnt in front of women and children; this killed many people. Drugs were one of the only things that kept GI's going and amphetamines were used to keep the troops awake at night. Drugs were not popular and this would have increased the anti-war movement. The war was costing $20 billion a year, the taxes in America had to be increased, this annoyed the American public, and this made America even more anti-war. A major reason for the anti-war movement in America was the failure of the Tet offensive. It convinced the American people that this was a war they could not win. This was the major turning point in the anti-war movement and strengthened it dramatically and I believe this is the most important reason why there was an anti-war movement. I believe there is sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States in the late 1960s and early 1970s. However, there were many reasons that were not mentioned in the sources and all the reasons are important. 2280 words ?? ?? ?? ?? Rachel Husband 11Y ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the USA pursue a policy of detente in the early 1970's?

    Unsurprisingly, this dismay led to enormous fear of a potential nuclear war. Since the seeds of the Cold War were first sown in the aftermath of the Second World War, America and the Soviet Union had aimed to exemplify its military strength by stockpiling nuclear weapons.

  2. Was the My Lai Massacre a failure in the Rules of Engagement or a ...

    They shouted: "No VC, No VC!" hoping that the Americans would stop.3 At around 8:15 Am, Lt. Calley told Sergeant Meadlo that he wants them all dead, and ordered Meadlo to kill them. Meadlo did so and shot them with his M16.

  1. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    The nuclear issue hold particular significance when examined in the context of conflicting national interests. China felt that nuclear weapons would help reach its ultimate goal of worldwide communist revolution, but Moscow resisted from giving assistance to the Chinese nuclear program without a controlling hand in its defence policy.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Not willing to tolerate a Lebanese forces which was hostile to him Amin had to remove Fadi Frem and so throughout 1984 he used his base in the Phalange to undermine Frem with a view to replacing him as soon as Frem's mandate as head of the LF expired.

  1. Post-Cold War Realities

    Iran?s Foreign Policy since 1990: Pragmatism Supercedes Islamic Ideology. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Commack, New York, 1999. p. 63 [2] Sobhani, Rob, ?U.S., Iran and the Caspian,? Georgetown University, Fall 2001, class lectures [3] Tarock, 59 [4] ibid, 63-64 [5] Nichols, Thomas, ?The Logic of Russian Presidentialism: Institutions and Democracy in Postcommunism,? The Carl Beck Papers in Russian and Eastern European Studies, no.

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    "One does not defoliate (destroy vegetation in) a country and deform its people with chemicals if one is attempting to persuade them of the foe's evil nature." (Source C) Because of these anti US feelings (and the fact the Viet Cong often bullied people into aiding them)

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    I also know that they were not in Vietnam to let them guide their own country in their own way. If they wanted to let them guide their own country in their own way they would let them turn to communism like they want to and they wouldn't have split the country along the 17th parallel.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    He states that the reason America was involved was because they were fighting for "Freedom." He used this as an excuse for the U.S' behaviour during the war with the use of extreme tactics and weaponry. In all, he was trying to make a bad situation into a good one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work