• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A-F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United Statesduring the late 1960s and early 1970s?

Extracts from this document...


Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A-F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s? By 1967 a national movement against the war had developed. Some of the opposition came from socialists or radicals who sympathized with the Vietnamese and wanted to help create a united, independent, Vietnam. Pacifists were also against the war because they believe that all war is wrong. Other people just believed that the war was not worth the lives of American men. The Vietnam War was mainly a media war shown on television, heard on radio and read in the newspapers. The USA needed the support of its people to win this war and the media was turning them against it. TV showed prisoners being tortured and executed and women and children watching their house burning to the ground. Pictures showed the affects of napalm and the American public was horrified. All of these things fueled the anti-war movement. People began to draft dodge and staged demonstrations. At Kent State University four students were killed by the National Guard and this shocked the public. The war was making the USA increasingly unstable. The one event that had a particularly devastating effect on American and international support for the war was the Mai Lai Massacre. ...read more.


Its intended audience was the US public and this would have an influence on the anti-war movement in America. It is sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the USA because it was at the time of the movement and it fueled it. It is primary evidence and this is important, as if it was not then it could not have contributed to the movement. However we do not know who or how many people saw it. This is a weakness because if not many people saw it then it would not have had much affect on the anti-war movement. It is also biased against the war and the US government so people may have not taken it seriously. Source D is a cartoon that was published in the British magazine punch in 1967. It shows the effects of President Johnson's war policy on the 'Great society'. You can see a train moving along and this is the US economy. The carriages are the great society but they are being chopped up and burnt in the fire on the train to fuel it. The 'great society' is fueling the US economy. 1967 is before the big anti-war movement and this means that it could have contributed to it. ...read more.


This appalled them and the effects lasted for generations. Another reason was guerilla tactics were frustrating and the war lasted for such a long time that soldiers started giving up hope of ever winning the war. People saw many civilian targets and this was not what they wanted. They saw houses being burnt in front of women and children; this killed many people. Drugs were one of the only things that kept GI's going and amphetamines were used to keep the troops awake at night. Drugs were not popular and this would have increased the anti-war movement. The war was costing $20 billion a year, the taxes in America had to be increased, this annoyed the American public, and this made America even more anti-war. A major reason for the anti-war movement in America was the failure of the Tet offensive. It convinced the American people that this was a war they could not win. This was the major turning point in the anti-war movement and strengthened it dramatically and I believe this is the most important reason why there was an anti-war movement. I believe there is sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States in the late 1960s and early 1970s. However, there were many reasons that were not mentioned in the sources and all the reasons are important. 2280 words ?? ?? ?? ?? Rachel Husband 11Y ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    The smoke coming out of the train has the word "Vietnam" embossed inside it. It shows how President Johnson's vision to "feed and shelter the homeless...provide more education and medical care," (Source D) was being thrown away to pay for what many thought was a needless war.

  2. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    This was the final straw; the stubborn attitudes of the leaders resulted in the Soviets withdrawing its scientists from the PRC. The Chinese continued to strive towards nuclear armament unaided after 1959, to success, producing its first atom bomb in 1964 and its first hydrogen bomb in 1967.

  1. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in Contemporary Literature, Film and popular ...

    The author may have attempted to reinforce this view. The background of the author is another questionable aspect of the source along with his views and motives for writing the piece he has written. We are unsure whether the author opposed war but from his interviewees we can gather he was opposed to war.

  2. Why did the USA pursue a policy of detente in the early 1970's?

    Unsurprisingly, this dismay led to enormous fear of a potential nuclear war. Since the seeds of the Cold War were first sown in the aftermath of the Second World War, America and the Soviet Union had aimed to exemplify its military strength by stockpiling nuclear weapons.

  1. Why did a student movement develop in the 1960's and 1970's In the USA

    This optimism was shattered when; in 1963 the president was shot dead. This event coupled with the stories of horrors from the Vietnam War completely destroyed any optimism that had been present in the early part of that decade. Many American students began to see their society as corrupt.

  2. Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s?

    Another reason why people turned against the war was because of their raised taxes. Both the human and financial cost of the war was very high for the US so funds could not be used to address social problems such as poverty and civil rights in the US.

  1. "The war on colour television screens in American living rooms had made Americans far ...

    This account was sent to 30 leading government officials. It triggered an investigation and popular American magazine 'Life' became involved. It caused such controversy because it showed America clearly didn't know what they were doing in Vietnam. This source is a form of protest, but it is not sufficient to make the US loose the war.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    This gesture of sympathy hit a lot of the public hard, as it was them who had fathers, brothers and sons who were amongst the casulties. "Dear Uncle Sam, I know you're a busy man, And tonight I write to you through tears with a tremblin' hand.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work