• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is There Sufficient Evidence In Sources A-F To Suggest Why There Was An Anti-War Movement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Laura M. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s? In March 1968 President Johnson announced that he would not be running for the Presidency. The Secretary of Defence quit in 1961. He said that the bombing was pointless and should be stopped - this event more than likely encouraged the anti-war movement. All the events in the sources contributed to the anti-war movement in some way, Huge Protest marches occurred in 1969, 1970 and 1971, almost half a million people took part in it. The Vietnam War veterans (people who had fought in Vietnam and had quit or had accidents, or finished their tour of duty.) This paper is supposed to show whether there was sufficient information in the following sources to have led to the anti-war movement. Source A explains about the pressures of being in the army and comments on things that could have contributed to the anti-war movement because the book was based on real events but you could also be led to think that the information isn't reliable. ...read more.

Middle

This article shows people what it was like in Vietnam, and how the American soldiers were in a dilemma because they didn't know who the enemy was. The second paragraph is questioning their actions. It shows the war in a bad light, a lot of people read it, and relied on newspapers rather than television since it was a rather new invention. The audience would have been anyone who picked up a newspaper in that time, and it would have travelled by word of mouth as well. Source D was published in a British magazine called "Punch" in 1967. It's meaning is that the 'great society' that the President had promised had in effect gone up in smoke. It was heading towards disaster. This piece wouldn't have had a big effect on the anti-war movement in America but it would have been a different story in England because I imagine a lot of people read it. The cartoon pictured in Source D criticises the American government and emphasises the fact that they're wasting money on a pointless cause. ...read more.

Conclusion

But seeing as it was a film we don't know whether we can trust its accuracy and it might have been exaggerated, the point of view was also mostly from an old army veteran so he was biased. I think there is enough evidence in these sources to suggest that they all helped in the anti war movement, in one way or another most detail events that happened in the Vietnam war, and protests were constantly happening in America. Some of the sources would have been incredibly beneficial to the anti-war movement had they been seen at the right time. There isn't enough evidence as well because we don't know the amount of people who read these sources and some of them we don't know exactly where they were published. Over all though I think these events/sources added to the anti-war movement they all show bad things that have gone on, on both sides and in the end everyone just wants the blood shed to stop. Laura M. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in ...

    This may have caused the anti-war movement because it is getting people to consider and question the US military methods. It is sort of saying that what the Americans are fighting for is good but the way they are fighting it is wrong.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    The use of Napalm alone was strongly opposed and added to the destruction of rainforests and spraying of chemicals caused massive opposition to the tactics being used to win the war. Americans thought the war, which at the time was costing them $20 billion year, was weakening an already fragile

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    On the other hand, it must be considered that the person who captured the image had deliberately taken the photo in this way. As a result, it is one sided because we do not see what may have been the situation beyond the borders of the photo; this could have a completely different effect on what the image suggests.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    the first civil rights law since 1875, creating the Commission on Civil Rights and prohibiting interference with the right to vote (blacks were still massively disenfranchised in many southern states). A second enactment (1960) provided federal referees to aid blacks in registering for and voting in federal elections.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    It captures two young Vietnamese children who are napalm victims. The children are running down a street away from where the napalm had supposedly hit their village and in the background you can see the US army standing there filming them and not giving any help or support to the children.

  2. IsThere Sufficient Evidence In Sources a-E To Explain Why There Was an Anti-WarMovement In ...

    The cost of this was the lives of thousands of young Americans, dying for a cause unclear to the public, who, like the soldiers, did not truly know who the enemy was. All the American public saw and heard was how young lives were being thrown away, everyday in newspapers, on their television screens and from their radios.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A-F to explain why there was an anti ...

    I don't think he went looking for the picture, he just happened to be in the right place at the right time. It's a very explicit source and would have made people back home think twice about what the government was doing.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A-F to explain why there was an anti-war ...

    On the other hand the image may not have been seen everywhere, and it can only encourage anti-war movements if the image is seen. This links with source A as they are both anti-America. Source C is an extract from an article, written by Richard Hamer (an American Journalist)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work