• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is There Sufficient Evidence In Sources A-F To Suggest Why There Was An Anti-War Movement?

Extracts from this document...


Laura M. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s? In March 1968 President Johnson announced that he would not be running for the Presidency. The Secretary of Defence quit in 1961. He said that the bombing was pointless and should be stopped - this event more than likely encouraged the anti-war movement. All the events in the sources contributed to the anti-war movement in some way, Huge Protest marches occurred in 1969, 1970 and 1971, almost half a million people took part in it. The Vietnam War veterans (people who had fought in Vietnam and had quit or had accidents, or finished their tour of duty.) This paper is supposed to show whether there was sufficient information in the following sources to have led to the anti-war movement. Source A explains about the pressures of being in the army and comments on things that could have contributed to the anti-war movement because the book was based on real events but you could also be led to think that the information isn't reliable. ...read more.


This article shows people what it was like in Vietnam, and how the American soldiers were in a dilemma because they didn't know who the enemy was. The second paragraph is questioning their actions. It shows the war in a bad light, a lot of people read it, and relied on newspapers rather than television since it was a rather new invention. The audience would have been anyone who picked up a newspaper in that time, and it would have travelled by word of mouth as well. Source D was published in a British magazine called "Punch" in 1967. It's meaning is that the 'great society' that the President had promised had in effect gone up in smoke. It was heading towards disaster. This piece wouldn't have had a big effect on the anti-war movement in America but it would have been a different story in England because I imagine a lot of people read it. The cartoon pictured in Source D criticises the American government and emphasises the fact that they're wasting money on a pointless cause. ...read more.


But seeing as it was a film we don't know whether we can trust its accuracy and it might have been exaggerated, the point of view was also mostly from an old army veteran so he was biased. I think there is enough evidence in these sources to suggest that they all helped in the anti war movement, in one way or another most detail events that happened in the Vietnam war, and protests were constantly happening in America. Some of the sources would have been incredibly beneficial to the anti-war movement had they been seen at the right time. There isn't enough evidence as well because we don't know the amount of people who read these sources and some of them we don't know exactly where they were published. Over all though I think these events/sources added to the anti-war movement they all show bad things that have gone on, on both sides and in the end everyone just wants the blood shed to stop. Laura M. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Assad tested the winds of the world for a week or so, calculated that his Iraqi enemy was head-ed for catastrophe, and offered himself as a partner in the American-led coalition. By mid-August, as the daily al-Safir noted, it was obvious that "Gulf events have removed foreign barriers standing against

  2. Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in ...

    This source generalises on the army of the US and Vietcong, by saying they were very inexperienced compared to the Vietcong soldiers. The reason for this was that conscription was introduced and the USA were just throwing men at the Vietcong, who had little training.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    Americans saw devastating images of dead Vietnamese, dead and injured American G.I.s, refugees, injured civilians etc. For example the My Lai Massacre on the 16th March 1968 horrified the world as people found that the Americans were the cause of a 350-500 casualty massacre of unarmed Vietnamese civilians.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    That is probably because their young age suggests they had nothing to do with Viet Cong and were innocent sufferers of American attacks, which in the photo is emphasized by the American soldiers walking further back. Consequently, American people would have sympathised for them as well as realise how much

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    In 1860 the political system became completely fragmented. The Democrats split into northern and southern wings, presenting two different candidates for the presidency; the small CONSTITUTIONAL UNION PARTY attempted to rally the former Whigs behind a third. The Republicans, however, were able to secure the election of Abraham LINCOLN to the White House.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    Also you don't know whom Michael Bilton is and weather he's a well-known good writer or an unknown writer, writing a one off book that is very unpopular and has no good reviews or comments about it. Source B is a photograph showing the effects of the US bombing.

  1. IsThere Sufficient Evidence In Sources a-E To Explain Why There Was an Anti-WarMovement In ...

    Soldiers who survived this year gained the experience to the fight skilled guerrillas, which new soldiers could not decipher from ordinary civilians. However, once their year was up, they were free to go home, leaving others to face experienced fighters without adequate training and know-how.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A-F to explain why there was an anti ...

    In Source B it shows a very shocking picture what would have disturbed people back home in the USA. The photographer was a Journalist and not a war photographer. I think the reasons why he too the picture was really to shock people back home, and also to make a bit of money for himself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work