• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to E to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960's and early 70's?

Extracts from this document...


History coursework-vietnam Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to E to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960's and early 70's? During the late 60s and early 70s, anti-war movement was steadily progressing in the United States. The peace movement was directed to stop all forms of war. As the sixties wore on many anti-war groups began to form in the United States to protest for peace. These included the Black Panthers, the SDS, Woodstock, music and flower power, and the Hippy Movement. The anti-war movement attracted people from college campuses, middle class suburbs, labour unions and government institutions. Pacifists were also against the war on moral and religious grounds as they believed all war is wrong because it is against Christian teaching. By the end of the sixties, opposition to the war was so strong that an anti-war statement was effective and powerful. Source A is an extract from the book 'four hours in my Lai', by Michael Bilton. ...read more.


This may have been one of the reasons for the anti-war movement because the distraught faces of the innocent children brought a feeling of guilt to the American people. However this source is biased and may have been used as propaganda to try and persuade the American people that taking part in the war would result in the loss of many innocent lives. Source C is by Richard Hamer, an American journalist, writing in 1970 about the widespread opposition to the American presence in Vietnam. This is a primary source which explores the difficulties of fighting guerrillas. 'Should you kill of them or none of them?' This suggests the American soldiers weren't killing the people they wanted to. The source is very negative towards U.S involvement in Vietnam and suggests reasons for the anti-war movement. 'A couple of guys are dead, others are screaming in agony with a leg or arm blown off, or their guts hanging out'. This is a shocking sentence which made American people feel that the U.S involvement in Vietnam was resulting in many gruesome and pointless deaths. ...read more.


It is a primary source and is very reliable. This source suggests another reason for why the American public were becoming against the American involvement due to the fact that media were making the deaths and casualties look a lot more gruesome. 'Blood looks very red on the colour television screen'. At this time of the war technology had advanced and many people had colour televisions and could see the real horrors of the war. Many families who had sent their boys to Vietnam wanted them back safely because the dead bodies shown on the TV could be one of their loved ones. So overall I think that sources A to E give sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the U.S during the late 1960's and early 70's because they are all valid and very reliable. They also explore all the different reasons which could have sparked an anti-war movement. The sources suggest that the anti-war movement mainly began when the American public became aware of what was actually going on in Vietnam. This was due to anti-war propaganda. ?? ?? ?? ?? Imran khan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    When he says "to leave Vietnam to its fate would shake the value of an American commitment..." what he is trying to is say the freedom of the American people but what he means is to put a stop to communism.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    On 23 September, LF and Syrian delegations had a productive session in the Beqaa and on 26 September the LF handed over the crossing points on Aoun-LF fronts to Hirawi government troops. On 28 September, the Ta'if regime committed its prestige and existence to a successful showdown by imposing a

  1. The anti- war movement - Vietnam.

    "we have repeatedly seen the cruel image of Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together". This sparred on the growing opposition to the war. There were many anti Vietnam songs coming out. One band, "Jefferson Star ship" produced over 3 songs anti Vietnamese war.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    that these are the President's true thoughts and feelings, and so it can be used to investigate what they were.

  1. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    The Soviets were alarmed at the power China held due to its newly acquired title of a world superpower, despite not having the same standing as the USA or the USSR, China was in a position of influence.

  2. Is There Sufficient Evidence In Sources A-F To Suggest Why There Was An Anti-War ...

    some of the audience who heard it would have been American so it would have spread word when they got back home. Robin Day talks about how war looks so realistic on colour TV and how the blood and the fighting is so much worse he talks about how it's made the American public more anti-war than anything.

  1. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    This source would have been by the public but in a different method. It may have been published in a newspaper or book during the war. Even though what the source is telling me is backed up by my own knowledge, it does not contribute to agreeing with the statement

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    To add to that, he was also a Christian which meant he did not follow in the Vietnamese culture. Ngo Dinh Diem was a very corrupt man as he did whatever the United States asked him to do for money.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work