• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s? During the late 1960s and

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework assignment- Question 3 Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s? During the late 1960s and early 1970s the number of Americans opposing the war had increased rapidly and so an anti-war movement took place. There were many different reasons for this, some of which are suggested by sources A to F. First of all, source A is an extract from the book 'Four hours in My Lai' and it gives a negative view of the war and in particular, the army. For instance, "...most likely to die in the first month" suggests that soldiers were weak and ineffective in the war. This would have made American people oppose the war because they would have felt their government made the wrong decision sending men to the war; especially since some were very young at the time. Therefore when the public came to realise the amount of soldiers dying in the war they would have been worried that their relatives or friends in the war were also at risk of death. The limitations of this source is that it was published in 1992 which means people in that period were not influenced by it for it to help explain why there was an anti-war movement. ...read more.

Middle

as he has written this I can infer that he felt the war was not being fought how he felt it should have been. This source is sufficient in suggesting why there was an anti-war movement in America because it is a form of media that was written by an American therefore it may have influenced the way people thought. Moreover, since it was written by an American during the early 1970s; it represents how some Americans felt about the Vietnam War. However it is only sufficient to an extent that people may have disagreed with writer' s view as it is his own opinion, which also makes the source one-sided. Another source expressing someone's opinion is source D which is a cartoon. It was published in the British magazine 'Punch' in 1967- period of anti-war movement in America. It is meant to show the effects of President Johnson's war policy on the 'Great Society'. That is his promise to the American public to improve education, medical care as well as feed and shelter the homeless. However a lot of the money that he planned to spend on his Great Society was instead spent on the war in Vietnam. ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, it was written on a helmet which suggests it was written during the war, making its meaning more credible. As a result this source goes far in explaining why there was an anti-war movement in America because it represents the feelings of a GI- which in consequence could easily reflect the attitude of the American public, especially since they saw what took place in Vietnam through television. On the other hand it is limited because the GI may have only written this as a result of a bad incident at war which had startled and disturbed him at the time, yet faded in the long term. To conclude, I believe that there is sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s. I believe this because, together, sources A to F have a diverse range of reasons why the American public may have opposed the war and more importantly the sources were all written, produced, or distributed as a form of media. Hence it is media, it means that their contents, which all opposed the war, may have had a big influence on the American people and so lead them to act against the Vietnam War. By Yasmine Mohamed-Ali ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the USA pursue a policy of detente in the early 1970's?

    The Soviet government was spending huge amounts on defence. Estimates suggest that in the year 1969-70, the Soviet Union spent the equivalent of $53 billion on defence. America's defence spending was around $78 billion, but not only was it fighting the Vietnam War, its gross national product was more than twice that of the Soviet Union7.

  2. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    The real indicator of collapsed relations was the personal jibes they made at each other, Khrushchev calling Mao an 'Asian Hitler' and Mao responding by referring to his as a 'redundant old boot'. The practicality of a Sino-Soviet relationship is unfeasible, when Soviet and Chinese leaders insisted on offensive personal references; a real hindrance in progressing their alliance.

  1. Evaluation of key sources to address the question of increased tension

    Source D2 is a primary source and is useful to show that the two met together in Vienna. Despite this, its utility is limited; we cannot analyze the possibility of increased tension as we do not know what was discussed.

  2. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    I also know that they were not in Vietnam to let them guide their own country in their own way. If they wanted to let them guide their own country in their own way they would let them turn to communism like they want to and they wouldn't have split the country along the 17th parallel.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Arafat and others to restore the anomalous state of affairs that previously existed." On May 30 1985, much of Sabra fell to its attackers. Amid Arab and Soviet political pressures on Syria and an emergency meeting of Arab League foreign ministers scheduled to discuss the issue June 8, Amal declared a unilateral ceasefire the next day.

  2. How Far Did Life Improve For Women, Landlords, Businessmen And Peasants Between 1949 And ...

    People living in communes were paid according to the work points earned but they had to contribute a certain amount to various commune funds. Despite some negativity, by the end of 1958, 90% of people had been placed in one of 26,578 People's Communes12.

  1. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    tell whether he had changed his mind to be supportive of the war due to his speech being public. Like Source A, President Johnson is speaking and he was directly involved in the war so he knows what he is talking about and can make therefore use his knowledge and experiences to make informed arguments.

  2. Vietnam Assignment – History Sources Question

    In days leading up to this period the American public felt cheated by the press. They were given the impression that victory was almost in sight. When news of the Tet Offensive sank in, Americans jumped to the conclusion that they had been mislead by the press and that the whole army were tricking them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work