• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s? During the late 1960s and

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework assignment- Question 3 Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s? During the late 1960s and early 1970s the number of Americans opposing the war had increased rapidly and so an anti-war movement took place. There were many different reasons for this, some of which are suggested by sources A to F. First of all, source A is an extract from the book 'Four hours in My Lai' and it gives a negative view of the war and in particular, the army. For instance, "...most likely to die in the first month" suggests that soldiers were weak and ineffective in the war. This would have made American people oppose the war because they would have felt their government made the wrong decision sending men to the war; especially since some were very young at the time. Therefore when the public came to realise the amount of soldiers dying in the war they would have been worried that their relatives or friends in the war were also at risk of death. The limitations of this source is that it was published in 1992 which means people in that period were not influenced by it for it to help explain why there was an anti-war movement. ...read more.

Middle

as he has written this I can infer that he felt the war was not being fought how he felt it should have been. This source is sufficient in suggesting why there was an anti-war movement in America because it is a form of media that was written by an American therefore it may have influenced the way people thought. Moreover, since it was written by an American during the early 1970s; it represents how some Americans felt about the Vietnam War. However it is only sufficient to an extent that people may have disagreed with writer' s view as it is his own opinion, which also makes the source one-sided. Another source expressing someone's opinion is source D which is a cartoon. It was published in the British magazine 'Punch' in 1967- period of anti-war movement in America. It is meant to show the effects of President Johnson's war policy on the 'Great Society'. That is his promise to the American public to improve education, medical care as well as feed and shelter the homeless. However a lot of the money that he planned to spend on his Great Society was instead spent on the war in Vietnam. ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, it was written on a helmet which suggests it was written during the war, making its meaning more credible. As a result this source goes far in explaining why there was an anti-war movement in America because it represents the feelings of a GI- which in consequence could easily reflect the attitude of the American public, especially since they saw what took place in Vietnam through television. On the other hand it is limited because the GI may have only written this as a result of a bad incident at war which had startled and disturbed him at the time, yet faded in the long term. To conclude, I believe that there is sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s. I believe this because, together, sources A to F have a diverse range of reasons why the American public may have opposed the war and more importantly the sources were all written, produced, or distributed as a form of media. Hence it is media, it means that their contents, which all opposed the war, may have had a big influence on the American people and so lead them to act against the Vietnam War. By Yasmine Mohamed-Ali ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far sas the Sino-Soviet Split of the late 1960s the result of ideological ...

    In October 1969, Beijing published its 'basic principles' demanding "the eventual replacement of the unequal treaties with a new, equal Sino-Soviet treaty and for the erection of properly surveyed border markers." There is little to suggest that border disputes were the result of ideological differences, however, as they had existed

  2. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    The real indicator of collapsed relations was the personal jibes they made at each other, Khrushchev calling Mao an 'Asian Hitler' and Mao responding by referring to his as a 'redundant old boot'. The practicality of a Sino-Soviet relationship is unfeasible, when Soviet and Chinese leaders insisted on offensive personal references; a real hindrance in progressing their alliance.

  1. To What Extent Have The Attempts For A Palestinian State Been Blocked By The ...

    As Noam Chomsky explains in 'Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest For Global Dominance', the choice for Israel was 'peace and integration' or 'confrontation, hence inevitable dependency on US'. The chance for peace was denied by the Israeli, but 'not on grounds of security but because of commitment to expansion'.

  2. The Crisis Decades(TM) of capitalism in the early 1970s and early 1980s were the ...

    The fixed exchange rate system that greatly facilitated economic progress in the Golden Age broke down in 1971 and led to the devaluation in oil prices since oil prices were fixed to the US dollar, which led to a corresponding loss in oil revenue for the oil exporters.

  1. Is There Sufficient Evidence In Sources A-F To Suggest Why There Was An Anti-War ...

    The audience was aimed at Americans in general. It would have made a difference had it have been made at the right time, America was still divided in opinion, some were very keen for the war to continue and others had very strong beliefs about stopping it.

  2. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    do this he is linking other presidents' actions as a tool of persuasion. The president then says "Our objective is the independence of South Vietnam and the freedom of the people of South Vietnam to guide their Country in their own way".

  1. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    The Great society is when the poor, especially the blacks would receive decent welfare payments and decent homes. However, little had been achieved. Johnson wanted them, but couldn't afford it. The war was costing 20 billion pounds a year so the great society was pushed to one side as this source suggests.

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    Some of the sources that do not support the interpretation that the media was an important reason as to why the United States lost the war in Vietnam are as follows. Source D is a North Vietnamese poster which shows problems that the American army faced as a result of guerrilla warfare tactics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work