• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in the United States during the late 1960's and early 1970's? During the Vietnam War, the US army had another opposition apart from the Vietcong.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in the United States during the late 1960's and early 1970's? During the Vietnam War, the US army had another opposition apart from the Vietcong. The American people had started an anti-war movement against their own government. Horrific television scenes had added to the anger of the protesters. The anti-war movement started almost as soon as the war in 1965, at first their group was small and most people supported the war and saw the demonstrators as cowards and communists. By 1968 the protesters had become more extreme, when two Americans burnt themselves to death. By November 1968 there was an estimated 30% of Americans who wanted the war to end. I think that there is sufficient evidence from these sources to explain why there was an anti war movement, as each source is explaining and describing the negative effects of America's military tactics. This source is from a book called "four hours in My Lai" by Michael Bilton and is a secondary piece of information as it was produced in 1992. ...read more.

Middle

It shows 5 children scared and screaming, while there are three US soldiers behind them, who don't seem to be helping them, as if they don't care. It also shows the brutality of the Americans tactics as they target villages of women and children. Source C is an article written by American journalist Richard Hamer. He is writing about the widespread opposition tot he American presence in Vietnam. It is a primary source and was written in 1970. The purpose of this article was to get people to consider and question America's military methods. This source is quite unreliable as it doesn't give a balanced argument and is one sided. For example he says that the US used napalm, high explosives and destroyed vegetation without warning. He is saying that if the Americans are trying to persuade the Vietnamese people of how evil the Vietcong are and that communism is wrong, the blowing them up is the wrong way to persuade them. He doesn't describe the full extent of the Vietcong brutality and just describes the Americans. This may have been because most newspapers at the time were against the government and would write what the majority of the American people wanted to hear, so they would make more money. ...read more.

Conclusion

The purpose of this source was to express his own and the BBC's opinion on America's way of inhibited television coverage to its public. This is quite a reliable source as it comes from a war correspondent that must have researched all his facts first before broadcasting them. It has also been unedited, as it is a British statement, this also means that it is coming from a point of view, which isn't involved in the war, and therefore there should be no bias. However the British government sponsors the BBC, which are allied and are trying to stay on the good side of America. Therefore even though this statement is unedited, the commentator Robin Day may have been told before hand not to completely slander and criticise the USA. This source is a statement by BBC commentator Robin Day to a seminar of the royal united service institution. This may have caused the anti-war movement because he is expressing his and the BBC's view, which is that the American government is letting the American public watch more coverage of Vietnam than they should be. And that allowing them to watch scenes of war on there colour televisions, is just adding tot he anger of the anti-war movement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    we realise that Guthrie wants us to question the motives behind America's involvement in Vietnam. The line is riddled with a sense of regret. Guthrie believes that the, after the horrific behaviour of the Americans serving in the war, America will have to face the negative aspects of the war.

  2. Free essay

    Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950's and 1960's

    To increase aid, President Kennedy increased he number of military advisors from 100 to 1600 by 1963. he also helped to equip the ARVN (Army of the Republic of Vietnam- South Vietnamese Army). Also, in 1961, he spent nearly $270 million on military support for Diem.

  1. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    Source G may be completely true but because it was so long after we can not be sure of it. The author did not put in what happened to other soldiers and this helps to show that the author just wanted to show the bad side of what was happening so they themselves may have added more to the story.

  2. Why Did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s

    they had over 1 thousand bottles of wine and 8 prostitutes, so they really weren't up to fighting. Therefore Giap had taken over this valley of "Dien Bien Phu"; the French knew that the war was lost. I believe that the USA had been involved in this Vietnam War because

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    I conclude that overall source A is not very detailed and it tells me basic facts. I have also found that most of the facts it does tell me are untrue, I know this from my own knowledge and Source B, a more reliable and accurate source, tells me that the facts are wrong.

  2. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    Together they became known as the 'Pentagon Papers'. These secret documents showed how United States government officials had sometimes lied about and covered up incidents in the war. Members of congress were especially angry that important decisions to step up the war had been made without congress being told.

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    Again, Source G has not got anything to do with the media, but is an American soldier's point of view after he had heard that '347 unarmed civilians' had been killed in the My Lai Massacre.

  2. How did the poets and the songwriters of the 1960's react to the Vietnam ...

    used to work in the local oil refinery and when he returns from his 365 days of service he goes back to the refinery. With the words 'son if it was up to me' the hiring man is saying get lost.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work