• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in the United States during the late 1960's and early 1970's? During the Vietnam War, the US army had another opposition apart from the Vietcong.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in the United States during the late 1960's and early 1970's? During the Vietnam War, the US army had another opposition apart from the Vietcong. The American people had started an anti-war movement against their own government. Horrific television scenes had added to the anger of the protesters. The anti-war movement started almost as soon as the war in 1965, at first their group was small and most people supported the war and saw the demonstrators as cowards and communists. By 1968 the protesters had become more extreme, when two Americans burnt themselves to death. By November 1968 there was an estimated 30% of Americans who wanted the war to end. I think that there is sufficient evidence from these sources to explain why there was an anti war movement, as each source is explaining and describing the negative effects of America's military tactics. This source is from a book called "four hours in My Lai" by Michael Bilton and is a secondary piece of information as it was produced in 1992. ...read more.

Middle

It shows 5 children scared and screaming, while there are three US soldiers behind them, who don't seem to be helping them, as if they don't care. It also shows the brutality of the Americans tactics as they target villages of women and children. Source C is an article written by American journalist Richard Hamer. He is writing about the widespread opposition tot he American presence in Vietnam. It is a primary source and was written in 1970. The purpose of this article was to get people to consider and question America's military methods. This source is quite unreliable as it doesn't give a balanced argument and is one sided. For example he says that the US used napalm, high explosives and destroyed vegetation without warning. He is saying that if the Americans are trying to persuade the Vietnamese people of how evil the Vietcong are and that communism is wrong, the blowing them up is the wrong way to persuade them. He doesn't describe the full extent of the Vietcong brutality and just describes the Americans. This may have been because most newspapers at the time were against the government and would write what the majority of the American people wanted to hear, so they would make more money. ...read more.

Conclusion

The purpose of this source was to express his own and the BBC's opinion on America's way of inhibited television coverage to its public. This is quite a reliable source as it comes from a war correspondent that must have researched all his facts first before broadcasting them. It has also been unedited, as it is a British statement, this also means that it is coming from a point of view, which isn't involved in the war, and therefore there should be no bias. However the British government sponsors the BBC, which are allied and are trying to stay on the good side of America. Therefore even though this statement is unedited, the commentator Robin Day may have been told before hand not to completely slander and criticise the USA. This source is a statement by BBC commentator Robin Day to a seminar of the royal united service institution. This may have caused the anti-war movement because he is expressing his and the BBC's view, which is that the American government is letting the American public watch more coverage of Vietnam than they should be. And that allowing them to watch scenes of war on there colour televisions, is just adding tot he anger of the anti-war movement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the USA pursue a policy of detente in the early 1970's?

    American television networks were able for the first time to relay live images from the battlefields back home and the result was utter disbelief. Whereas Americans had once felt detached from war, they could suddenly see the bloody brutality of it as they sat down with their families at dinnertime or just before they went to bed.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    This soldier has seen someone running at them and they get the command to fire so the soldier has done their job in obeying the command. I think this soldier was interviewed because it was their first patrol and something bad happened and the author tries to put across that

  1. Vietnam War.

    Temporary Peace Despite the stepping up of US bombing, both sides appeared anxious to salvage the progress made in negotiation. On December 29, the United States announced a halt to the bombing above the 20th parallel, effective the next day.

  2. The anti- war movement - Vietnam.

    "But you'd never see anybody..." This helps us see why the American Public empathised with the soldiers, especially when truths much like this escaped. Source D is a very valuable source. It is an article written at the time by a journalist.

  1. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    of experience and understanding of the battlefield they were on and the people that inhabited it. Give a source here. Eg US 'Strategic Hamlets' policy did not take account of Viet religion - bones of ancestors buried in their land - forced to leave.

  2. Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and the 1960s? ...

    This was supported by the USA. To keep South Vietnam pro-Western, the Americans poured millions of dollars of economic aid and modern technological weaponery as well as military advisors. The North Vietnamese re-started the guerrilla campaign in South Vietnam in 1959 with the Vietcong. The South Vietnamese army, the ARVN, were not adequately trained to deal with guerrilla warfare so they crumbled.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    changed direction; the shooting which had previously been directed against the I.D.F. now shifted in the direction of the Lebanese Forces' liaison officer on the roof of the forward command post. According to the report of the Kahan Commission established by the government of Israel to investigate the events, the

  2. Post-Cold War Realities

    signatory of the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty, as Iran is.[27] Unexpectedly though, recent developments since September 11 have made relations between Washington, Tehran and Moscow much more positive, to the immense displeasure of Israel. In an unbridled show of pragmatism, President Vladimir Putin has backed the American effort in Afghanistan by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work