• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"It was not so much that Labour won the General Election of 1945, but that Churchill and the Conservatives lost it." Assess the validity of this view.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"It was not so much that Labour won the General Election of 1945, but that Churchill and the Conservatives lost it." Assess the validity of this view. The question of who "won" or "lost" the election is essentially a question of whether the election result was more of a failure of the Conservative party, or a success of the Labour party. Although it could be argued, as in source C, that "Labour's campaign had a much more modern look to it with a much wider appeal to the community as a whole", and so Labour were more successful at capturing the support of voters than the Conservatives, one could also argue that the election was really the Conservatives' to lose (they were widely seen as "the natural party of government", and had Winston Churchill, an extremely popular wartime Prime Minister, to their credit), and their various failures at campaigning and appeal were their undoing. The Labour Party had many positive advantages over the Conservatives, as listed in source B, the first being "the wartime experience". ...read more.

Middle

Overall, then, it is arguable that the 1945 election result was generally reflective of a positive swell of support for Labour than a negative reaction to a Conservative failure. It is worth noting that many of those who voted in the 1945 election were new voters who only became eligible to vote after the last election (which was ten years before in 1935). Thus much of the voting population were not habitual voters for any party, and it could be said that the result merely illustrated the gradual change which had taken place in the ten years between the two elections (the swing was in fact less pronounced than it seemed - Labour had been leading in polls for many years preceding the elections). The Conservatives, in contrast, had been damaged in a number of ways by the war. The party machinery, previously well-oiled and efficient, had been allowed to disintegrate - the Party did not hold annual conferences throughout the war coalition, and many of those who would run the local party branches (who in the Conservatives' case were often middle class and in non-reserved occupations) ...read more.

Conclusion

Finally, the proportion of votes to seats was very skewed in favour of Labour, making the victory appear more overwhelming than it was. The Conservatives still gained ten million votes (source A shows) to Labour's twelve million, so it was not the case that the Conservatives had lost a great deal of support by the end of the war - it was more the case that Labour had gained more support; the Conservatives had not been resoundingly defeated - Labour had just managed to beat them. Overall, then, the factors contributing to the 1945 election result can more easily support an opposite view to the one presented, because they portray the vote as a positive one for Labour rather than a negative one for the Conservatives. However, there is no reason why the election could not have been both won by Labour and lost by the Conservatives - indeed, it is hard to see how it could not have been both. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Assess the validity of the view that the Rump and Barebones parliaments had no ...

    The Rumpers were apparently intending to "perpetuate themselves" rather than to transfer their power to a temporary council of MPs who would oversee fresh elections as agreed on 19th April 1653. Whether or not this is true it still gave people at the time and later historians the impression of a weak, corrupt, self-interested government.

  2. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    were left effectively to their own devices to rule the homefront as Churchill struggled on with the war effort. Atlee became the deputy Prime Minister during the war. In addition, Morrison became Home Secretary and Bevin Minister of Labour and National Service.

  1. The Successes of Labour from 1945

    NHS hospitals would also be able to have a number of 'pay beds' and private wards. The medical profession was given a central role in the administration of the NHS. Overall, the NHS that emerged in 1948 was noticeably less 'socialist' than Bevan's first proposals had indicated.

  2. how successful was the labour govt 1945 - 51?

    However, this was not instantly noticeable and other plans did make up for this failing. Labour also promised the people of Britain a new housing scheme to rebuild those cities that had been blitzed in the war. They set a five-year target to build a million houses.

  1. Sir Winston Churchill

    Again, in 1908, they met again at a dinner party hosted by Lady St. Helier. This time, the two hit it off and began a lifelong romance. On August 10, 1908, Winston proposed to Clementine during a house party in Blenheim.

  2. 'It was not the liberals who won but the conservatives who lost' discuss

    The Boer war was an event that originally gained many Conservatives the vote in 1900, however this was only short term, and eventually it may have been a factor that contributed to their final defeat in the 1906 election. At the beginning of the war people voted Conservative because they believed they were patriotic and would win them their victory.

  1. Why did The Labour Party win the General Election in 1945?

    It was chaired by William Beveridge, an economist, who identified five "Giant Evils" in society: squalor, ignorance, want, idleness and disease. The main change that was promised in this report was the Welfare State, which made sure there was a commitment to health, education, employment and social security in the United Kingdom.

  2. Why did the Conservatives lose the 1929 election?

    Liberal programme won them votes, the Liberals won enough of the popular vote to hurt the Conservatives and split the anti-socialist vote indirectly helping Labour. The Conservatives also failed to offer to the people solutions to the problems of unemployment and the worsening economy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work