• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Josef Stalin and Leon Trotsky were both very powerful members of the Soviet Republic after the death of Lenin, but despite being members of the same party, they both had very different characteristics and beliefs.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History GCSE Coursework Coursework Assignment Objectives 2 and 3 Question 1 Josef Stalin and Leon Trotsky were both very powerful members of the Soviet Republic after the death of Lenin, but despite being members of the same party, they both had very different characteristics and beliefs. Trotsky was an intellectual, which meant that he could take an idea and make it original. The way Trotsky did this was by voicing his ideas logically and with reasonable arguments across to the people, despite the audience that he was speaking to; hence he was famously known as a great orator. His great speaking skills could be directly linked to his intellect, as all his speeches were well planned and considered thoughtfully. With this intellect though came great vanity and ignorance, which was noticed by Lenin in his last testament when he wrote, "...he has displayed excessive self assurance..." Trotsky was an organiser in every sense of the word, which can be seen by the fact that he was the main person responsible for planning the Bolshevik revolution. The revolution was over in 24 hours and no one was killed which was as successful as any revolution could be. His intellect can again be seen here by the method to which he carried out the revolution. He did not go storming anywhere, he systematically took control of all lines of communications so no backup or reinforcements could be sent. Another example of this was Trotsky's organisation as a war leader of the Red Army. Trotsky was by no means a lazy leader and spent practically all of his time as leader travelling all over Russia carrying out punishments and motivating the troops to keep morale high. Ruthlessness is something that Trotsky could certainly have been accused of though and he did not mind getting his hands 'dirty'. The 'Red Terror' was the name given to the extreme discipline of the Red Army stating that all deserters of those found with deserters would immediately be killed. ...read more.

Middle

As the old saying goes, 'knowledge is power' and Stalin could not have had more knowledge than he was offered with that post. The secret police had files on everyone. If Stalin wanted to blackmail somebody with 'skeletons from their closet', then he could find anything he wished to know through the Cheka. Also there is the obvious power of being able to make people 'diappear' that Stalin did not like, or felt was a threat. So overall one of the reasons that Stalin was able to come to power in the Soviet Union after the death of Lenin definitely was because of Stalin's position of power within the Communist Party. Trotsky's feelings that Stalin was a 'grey blur' lead him to be able to 'sneak around' unnoticed. So Stalin's positions may have been nothing on their own, but together he had 'unlimited authority. Question 3 Although Stalin's position of power within the Communist Party was a very important factor in why he was able to come to power in the Soviet Union after the death of Lenin, it was by no means the only reasons and had it not been for any one of the following factors Stalin possibly would not have been able to come to power. The Politburo consisted of two main groups with separate beliefs of how the Communist Party should advance, the Rightists and the Left Opposition. The Rightists believed in The differences in the Politburo allowed Stalin to join with the Rightists in order to destroy the Left and then turn against the right. Should these differences not have existed then the Politburo as a whole could have seen what Stalin was doing, instead of looking at the next way to outsmart their opponents. Stalin was able to manipulate each side of the Party by stirring up trouble from the other side. The differences between the left and the right can link strongly to most of the other factors to how Stalin was able to come to power. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin set up the 'Treaty of Moscow' which gave more land to Russia and the people in turn benefited from the housing and farming that could be achieved on that land. Stalin's policy of 'scorched earth' was successful in it's objectives, as with lack of supplies to the Germans, they soon had to retreat out of Russia. Most importantly Stalin won Russia the war, resulting in the Russian people being saved from death. One of Stalin's biggest achievements was the industrialisation of Russia. In the 10 years when the main part of this process was taking place steel production in Russia rose by an impressive 400% and coal by 350%. Stalin also looked even more impressive at that time because of the problems that were occurring all over the world for other countries. The 'Wall Street Crash' meant that unemployment was soaring in places like Britain, where at one point 30% of the country were unemployed. As Russia had a closed economy this did not affect it and unemployment was almost non-existent. This made people associate 'Communism' with prosperity rather than the poorer apparently more advanced countries of the West. All these things were very beneficial to the Russian people as unemployment was low and the economy was at it's pinicle. This rapid industrialisation however meant that there were people who did not acquire the working conditions that they would have required. People were often taken off the street for commiting no offence and used to build major public works like the Belamor Canal. The 'slave' workers were treated like animals, working extremely long hours, in confined spaces completely covered in dirt. After all of the work the canal did not even prove to be a success as it was too shallow and froze over in winter. Another of Stalin's proposals which did not benefit the Russian people was 'Collectivisation'. Collectivisation meant that no matter how hard, or how lazy you were you received the same amount of pay at the end of the working day. - 1 - Daniel Sheedy 5JR 5H1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the Impact Lenin Had On Russia and Its People Lenin was a great ...

    Though, it had to be done. Russia lost much of its territory, people, railway and raw materials. The land lost greatly affected the Russian economy because much of Russia's best farm land was lost, as was about one-sixth of Russia's population. The decrees that were passes by Sovnarkom had good effects on the people, though there were some people who dislike the decrees.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    revolutionary ideas and he started to take part in demonstrations along with other students. His attitude towards his studies changed as became more involved with the radical political parties. The memory of his dead brother made him strive to be revolutionary and this led to his hatred towards the Tsarist establishment.

  1. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    Lenin knew the NEP was a retreat from the principle of "State Control" of the economy. His pragmatic character comes out in the statement in 1921 to the party concerning NEP: "let the peasants have their little bit of capitalism as long as we keep power".

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    The local police, secret police (the OGPU), and the military backed them up, creating a quarter of a million agents, who collectivised 25 million peasant households22. They killed thousands of others who resisted and also sent several million to forced labour camps along with the political opponents.23 The way in

  1. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    by Farinacci who was becoming increasingly prominent in his speaking out against Mussolini's liberal economic policies. However Mussolini solved this problem by appointing Farinacci as party secretary, and then used him to centralise the party, thereby reducing the power of the Fascist party.

  2. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    Stalin continued with his devious movements and manipulating plans by ensuring that the public were aware of Bukharin?s disagreements with the ?idolised? Lenin. He made it his job to ensure that every small disagreement was republished and discussed in the media.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Targets for consumer goods production not met. Interpretations of industrialisation: Some economists accept that Stalin’s methods resulted in significant gains in industrial production in a short space of time, even though impossible targets could not be met. However also argued that this method was not the only one ï

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    A nother difference to add to this list is that Lenin proved to be a very good speaker, evidence for this is when he made that speech demanding for various conditions, later it became known as the April Theses. Lenin argued that there should be a second revolution ( socialist revolution ), but obviously determined.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work