• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Justice and War are incompatible". Discuss War is defined as armed conflict between two or more groups. The purpose of war is to resolve conflict.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Justice and War are incompatible". Discuss War is defined as armed conflict between two or more groups. The purpose of war is to resolve conflict. We see from Richard Norman that war by its very nature is problematic because it involves activities, which are normally thought deeply wrong. For example, the deliberate maiming and killing of other human beings. The main concern with any type of war is whether it can be justified. Some people may say war can never be justified because it goes against values we humans should hold, such as the preservation of human life. These people may include pacifists who believe in the sanctity of life. Other people may believe war can be justified if the just war criteria are met. Patriots may believe war can be justified because we have a duty to fight for our country and protect out neighbour. Some people may believe justice and war are incompatible because the intentional killing of another human being can never be seen as a justified act. Pacifists believe all fighting is wrong and that there are more creative ways to resolve conflict such as boycotts, sit-ins and strikes. ...read more.

Middle

Jesus did not use violence at his arrest in self-defence. So war and justice are incompatible because we should love our enemy and we are not loving them by killing them. However others and myself may disagree and believe justice and war are compatible especially in the case of self-defence. Elizabeth Anscombe argues pacifism is mistaken because it denies a person of self-defence and places unacceptable and extra-ordinary limits on an individual's rights. It is also dangerous because it encourages the belief that all killing is wrong and makes no distinction between legitimate and illegitimate killing or justified and unjustified killing. Louis Pojman asks what is a right if we do not have the right to defend it? Pacifists claim war and justice are incompatible because of Jesus' teaching of "turn the other cheek". However, it is one thing to offer your own cheek, but quite different to offer your neighbour's cheek. Also Jesus used violence to fight for what he thought was right. He fought for justice; therefore we see justice and war are compatible. For example, he used violence to challenge those who misused the temple as a place to make money. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only the force necessary to achieve the aim of war must be used. This rules out the use of nuclear weapons etc. Finally there must be discrimination over targets. Civilians must not be killed. Jus ad bellum considers when it is right to go to war. The war must have a just cause. Jus in bello considers how wars should be fought. This is very difficult to decide in our modern world because of the weapons available and the destruction they cause. Justice and war are compatible if the just war criteria are met and the principle of proportionality is implemented. Although we see this is difficult to meet in the modern world, especially because of the introduction of nuclear weapons as they cause mass destruction. In my opinion the use of modern weapons, which can cause devastation, can never be justified. This is because innocent civilians are killed and cities are usually bombed causing strain on resources, such as water. However, I do think justice and war are compatible in certain circumstances, such as an attempt to overthrow a dictator. In my opinion justice and war are compatible, but in modern society I do not think war can be justified because of the weapons used. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sehrish Saleemi ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    One option was "free," based on "representative government, free elections, guarantees of individual liberty, and freedom of speech and religion." The other option was "tyranny," based on "terror and oppression, a controlled press and radio, . . . and a suppression of personal freedoms."

  2. Vietnam War.

    of falsified votes (although Diem and other South Vietnamese officials were also accused of fraudulent election practices). The New War Begins The position taken by Diem won the backing of the United States. The Communist government in Hanoi, however, indicated its determination to reunify the nation under their rule.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    In the assault, Tony, his wife, baby daughter, maid, dog, and some 35 of his men were killed. Withdrawal proved difficult with Syrian check points everywhere, Syrian planes also strafed the raiders. With the Marada on the streets in large numbers, many of the Phalangists had to wait until nightfall and make their way back to their lines on foot.

  2. Post-Cold War Realities

    political and economic pressure.[7] It remains the predominant power in Central Asia and the Caucasus?regions in which Iran has considerable economic and political interests at stake. It can also provide much needed military, technological, and industrial expertise and assistance that Iran cannot get from the West.

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    The Zionists later lodged a bomb in the King David Hotel which was the British headquarters in Jerusalem. The sustained violent attacks of the terrorist groups forced Britain to proclaim that the problem was now being handed over to the recently shaped United Nations (UN).

  2. What is "Total War"? Discuss with reference to World War One and World War ...

    The government introduced a huge recruitment campaign. It was also the first time so much propaganda was used. Half a million joined the army in one month! The government tried as hard as possible to encourage men to sign up. There were posters, leaflets, exciting speeches from the politicians etc.

  1. Dismantling Violence in Mozambique.

    At the same time as they constructed a peaceful present, they creatively negotiated a brighter future. They assumed new identities by refusing to further participate in the war. They kidnapped back their sons and husbands and cleansed them from the violence; thus regenerating a healing community (Nordstrom 147).

  2. 'War seldom resolves the causes of conflict' Analyze this claim with reference to a ...

    Hedley Bull (3) states that war is due in part to the lack of robust security measures in the 'Anarchical Society'. This is evident in the fact that World War One was created by a lack of security which in turn triggered an increase in a series of alliances, which

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work