• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Kaiser Wilhelm II used to the full his authority as Kaiser of the German Empire." With reference to the period of 1890 - 1914, explain why you agree or disagree with this statement.

Extracts from this document...


"Kaiser Wilhelm II used to the full his authority as Kaiser of the German Empire." With reference to the period of 1890 - 1914, explain why you agree or disagree with this statement. Wilhelm II had the desire to be a much more powerful Kaiser than his grandfather had been and subsequently, he was not willing to leave the running of the country to the Chancellor. It was due to this belief in his 'divine right' to rule autocratically - he often referred to himself as 'the instrument of God' - he was constantly striving to achieve personal rule within the German Empire. However, despite his efforts, Wilhelm was too easily influenced by those around him to ever truly achieve personal rule. In order to achieve his own wishes, Eulenburg only had to flatter Wilhelm, and persuade him that his ideas were actually Wilhelm's, such as over the issue of the anti-socialist bill in 1894. The Constitution, introduced upon the re-unification of Germany in 1871, was created in such a way that the 26 states were not completely equal, as Prussia remained somewhat in control, and that the Chancellor, upon instruction from the Kaiser, ultimately could control them. In terms of Wilhelm's ability to achieve personal rule, this had various implications. As he had control over the appointment of government ministers to the Prussian State Administration, along with the same control over the Imperial Government ministers, most importantly, the Chancellor, he certain held a high degree of influence over the partially democratic system within Germany. This, coupled with his role as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, allowed him to have visions of creating an authoritarian, military dictatorship in which he could genuinely achieve personal rule. However, there was a constant power struggle between the publicly elected Reichstag and the Kaiser. Only the Chancellor, through the Kaiser's direction, could initiate new legislation into the Reichstag, severely limiting their powers and increasing that of the Kaiser. ...read more.


The issue of protective tariffs caused many issues for Wilhelm. Initially, Bulow lowered the tariffs placed on goods from Italy, Austria-Hungry and Russia, in return for a favourable rate on German goods. This decision made Wilhelm more popular with the Centre Left within the Reichstag, enabling him to gain a higher chance of receiving support for his Bills. However, as a further display of his irresolute nature, he failed to successfully have the Subversion Bill passed, as the working classes rose alongside German's industrial growth. This suggests that it was partly due to the Kaiser's own inability to chose consistent allies within the Reichstag that left him struggling to gain the type of authoritarian rule he desired. Unsurprisingly, Wilhelm changed his approach to protective tariffs in 1902 when Bulow presented the Tariff Act to the Reichstag. Instead of lowering the tariffs, as Bulow wished this Act increased them, in order to act as protection for the Junkers. One could argue that this act enabled Wilhelm to gain a higher degree of personal rule as it resulted in the formation of a Centre Right coalition, whilst leaving the SPD excluded and annoyed. However, it failed to please the more extreme Junkers and the loss of support from the SPD made it harder for the Kaiser to pass his Bills later on, including the 1905 military budget. Consequently, the sheer fact that Bulow had to play games with the Reichstag in order to enable the Kaiser to enforce his authority shows that in reality, the Kaiser was far from having personal rule and was instead accountable to those whom he would have seen as beneath him. This sense of being subject to the wishes of the Reichstag can be seen through the consequences of the Daily Telegraph Affair, in 1908. This incident, in which Wilhelm isolated himself from the public after an he had an unmonitored interview with the British newspaper, and that of the previous year when it became well known that some of his closet friends and advisors had been involved in a homosexual scandal, created a wedge between Bulow and Wilhelm. ...read more.


Consequently, there was a constant battle between the Kaiser and the Reichstag as the power balance fell strongly in the favour of the Reichstag. Financial problems, mainly due to the Kaiser's lack of direct control over taxation, occurred throughout this period, resulting in him having too little money to go ahead with his desired projects, such as gaining and running of Germany's unprofitable colonies. This in itself was a sign of his lack of personal rule but was further confirmed when Bulow was unable to solve the treasury's operating deficit due to the contrasting wishes of the various Reichstag parties, showing that the Kaiser was trapped in a battle to satisfy everyone else, rather than being able to simply satisfy himself through personal rule. Holwegg was able to delay the Reichstag elections for 2 years, freeing up funds to pay 90 million marks off the country's debt. Although this proved the Kaiser had some power granted by the constitution, in terms of raising more sustainable cash sources - such as through taxation - he was restricted by the Reichstag due to the limitations he had in relation to enforcing new legislation. Overall, throughout this twenty-four year period Wilhelm was engaged in a constant power struggle with the Reichstag. In relation to the statement, it is difficult to say that he used his full authority as those around him were constantly questioning this authority. Subsequently, there is strong evidence to suggest this statement is indeed incorrect - particularly, when one considers the frequent examples of the Reichstag's control over Wilhelm, such as that displayed after the Daily Telegraph Incident. However, there were also periods of triumph for Wilhelm, where, through a series of compromises and the skilful talents of his Chancellors, he managed to achieve his desires. Yet, by the sheer fact he needed to be so manipulative, proved he had failed to achieve personal rule and to thus use his full authority. ?? ?? ?? ?? History 11/07/2008 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How Successfully in the period 1870 to 1914 did the ruling elites of Germany ...

    By offering the liberals piecemeal concessions that at least appeared to favour free trade for example, he was assured of their support. In fact Bismarck's relationship with the Liberals was not insignificant. The so-called "liberal era" as Geoff Eley puts forward, produced "an impressive concentration of forward looking legislation [and]

  2. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    Furthermore over the years this militia had merged into the army, making it to a great extent harder for the King to ever use the army against Mussolini because the this militia had merged with the army, so it would have been difficult to get them to attack Mussolini as

  1. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    Since there were the only two possible conflicts, it seems the treaty might be useless. This, however, is not true. As Bismarck explained, "Our relations with Russia depend exclusively on the personal feeling of the Tsar Alexander III", and such a treaty brought Germany up a notch in the Tsar's eyes.

  2. Explain whether you agree or disagree with this statement - "The league of nations ...

    In retaliation to this Lithuania seized a port in Denmark called Memel, and again the League took no action. Its weaknesses were beginning to appear. Its first major failure came in 1923 - the Corfu crisis. An Italian general, Tellini, was murdered whilst settling border disputes between Greece and Albania.

  1. To what extent were economic considerations the main motive for Portuguese exploration and empire ...

    more resource s to gain this drove them to explore and capture new lands that they could then exploit and then have their slaves work in the fields. This increased output and decreased their dependency on other nations and intern caused them and drove them to explore and capture more

  2. In the years 1933 " 1945 the German Churches supported and collaborated with the ...

    to one of conflict between the years of 1933 and 1939 because at first the Nazis feared openly standing against religious policies as they felt they were not popular enough to stand against such an institution as the Catholic Church and did not yet have the power.

  1. How far can the impact of the depression be seen as a key turning ...

    creation of a large fleet of battleships capable of challenging the British navy which made the rest of Europe uneasy, and by about 1907 German policy makers had succeeded in creating Bismarck's nightmare: a Germany surrounded by an alliance of hostile neighbours--in this case Russia, France, and Britain--in an alliance

  2. To what extent did Kaiser Wilhelm have the real power within the second Reich? ...

    Consequently, his ultimate power can be shown when examining Hohenlohe?s chancellorship. The Kaiser managed to build an ocean-going fleet and involved himself in complex foreign and domestic policies, as well as major decisions, showing he could exercise his power domestically and internationally.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work