• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Kennedy chose to increase American commitment to South Vietnam because he wanted to maintain the USA's Status as a Super-power' Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Kennedy chose to increase American commitment to South Vietnam because he wanted to maintain the USA's Status as a Super-power' Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement. There are numerous reasons why Kennedy chose to escalate the US involvement in Vietnam, and not all of them are necessarily to do with the US's status as a Super-Power. Kennedy had pressure on him for his humiliation in his handling of the Bay of Pigs incident, his backroom staff and advisers were constantly at each others' throats and Kennedy had a firm belief that Communism was a blight upon the world and his strong religious views only forced that belief even further. The reason why Kennedy would want to maintain the USA's status as a super-power would be mainly for protection. This 'label' sets the USA up as the world's biggest and most powerful capitalist country, it acts as a deterrent towards the USSR who are also the only other Super-power at that time. ...read more.

Middle

This is a reason as to why Kennedy would increase US commitment in Vietnam, to prove himself and to stop Communism spreading. Kennedy believed in the Domino Theory. This was where Communism in a Communist country would spread out of that country and onto other countries, eventually making them fall to Communism. This were particularly a worrying prospect for Kennedy, Laos had fallen several weeks before Kennedy's inauguration, January 20th 1961, and now Vietnam looked a likely country that would fall next. But the worrying thing was also that countries of key American interest were at risk (according to the theory) of falling to Communism. Countries like The Philippines and Australia were at a potential threat from Communism. The USA also had reasons for increasing commitment that was not to do with Communism prevention or because it wanted to keep its Super-Power status. The USA was capitalist, and its economy thrived when the country was at war, so long as that war was far from home, big businesses that specialised in military equipment, vehicles etc would have needed a war or some USA military involvement in a country to make a healthy business. ...read more.

Conclusion

In Conclusion, Kennedy seems to have increased US involvement and commitment in Vietnam because he wanted it to become a stable country with minimum Communist influence. Perhaps he thought that this would lead as an example to the rest of the world, to show what America could really do in order to help old colonised countries, which then would be the USA increasing and maintaining its Super-power status. However, I would have to say that i disagree with the statement. Kennedy's main reason I believe of increasing US involvement was to contain Communism, but in doing this, America also showed the world what its stance on Communism was- that it would not stand idly by while what it saw as a threat to its very constitution was left to ravage the world. So it can be said that Kennedy did also increase US involvement because of wanting to maintain that status, but while that might be partly true, I find it more likely that the Super Power status was a less pressing thought and indeed maybe an advantage that came from showing an aggressive stance against Communism. ?? ?? ?? ?? Andrew Lloyd 12WPD ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    some of the countries of eastern Europe to break away from Communism. Marshall Aid was also intended to help here. * While the Truman Doctrine did not actually mention the Soviet Union, it was obvious that it was intended as a warning to Stalin that Truman was not going to

  2. The Bay of Pigs Invasion

    The invaders were "overready" and to call off the invasion would have "demoralized" the anti-Castro exiles (Lasky 516). Tim Weiner, a New York Times journalist, implied that President Kennedy had been in office just three months when the invasion took place and therefore did not have enough experience and understanding of the issue to make wise decisions (Weiner 2).

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    Information about the type of people questioned is important because different types of people would be biased about their view of the war. The number of people who were questioned is important, because even though there was a 64% majority, saying television influenced them to support the war, we do not know how many people it actually was.

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    campaign of the German U-boats threatened their merchant ships and when they learned of the German enticements to Mexico that Texas would be given to them if they were to declare war against the United States.4 The idea of isolationism broke out once again after the First World War ended.

  1. 'No power wanted war, but all were willing to risk one.' Discuss this ...

    Whilst the intention of the decision-makers, essentially a group known as the Common Ministerial Council, was to keep the war local, all were well aware of the possibility of Russian intervention. In a meeting of the ministers on the 7th July the precise policy of the Austrian government was decided.

  2. Why didn't Britain make a continental commitment between the wars? Explain

    the money to go to another war or commit one hundred per cent to the League of Nations, and what money it did have was being spent on many things such as the empire, trying to attract the votes of women and on war pensions.

  1. With reference to the period 1880 to the present day, explain why people chose ...

    But it was persecution that increased the flow of Jews into Britain, Western Europe and North America. The May laws did not drive all the Jews from Russia, 76,000 remained but they had extremely small farms. On average they were 4.3 acres each, these farmers just about survived.

  2. 1920's USA.

    The Stock Exchange and property market provided the perfect outlet for this. Not only did professional stockbrokers play the market, but also the normal working public, who found they could make 'easy money', as it says in the cartoon, by simply buying stocks.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work