• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

King Henry V: Noble Hero or Devious Brute?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

King Henry V: Noble Hero or Devious Brute? Arguably, William Shakespeare created the historical play, King Henry V for propaganda purposes. Requested by King Henry's distant relative Queen Elizabeth, the play portrays the main character, King Henry, in different aspects and facets. As a playwright of the time, Shakespeare felt he had to turn what was seen as a simple war hero into a complex character to make the play more interesting and to his liking. In this play Henry, upon his father's death, rapidly changed from a wild, boisterous youth, to a responsible, powerful king, faced with the decision of invading France. He won the battle with a small army against a large opposition and from his victory claimed a wife, Princess Katherine, from the French side. This essays intention is to explore Henry's character, whether he has the qualities of a noble hero or a devious brute. We must keep in mind how Shakespeare wanted the audience, perhaps the ruling monarchy at that time, to digest this play and their interpretations of Henry's character. The audience's first impression of Henry is influenced by their first taste of the play, the chorus. Read by the narrator, the chorus sets the scene for each act and summarizes part of the plot, introducing dramatic irony and different themes into the play. ...read more.

Middle

The French seem to respect him as a king, apart from the Dauphin who has been shown to be young and na�ve by sending Henry the tennis ball insult that partly triggered this whole siege. As the French king says, the Dauphin is 'Much mistaken in this king (Henry)'. Henry is described by the French king and the Constable with words and phrases like, 'fatal', 'royally', 'courage', 'fierce', 'noble' and 'strong'. These descriptions represent a Henry in a positive light and Shakespeare does this to show that Henry intimidates other rulers. The French, not including the Dauphin, obviously view Henry as something as a strong, noble, caring and influential. Henry shows these also in person by his skill of bringing moral and courage to his army at the siege of Harfleur, which is defiantly a good thing to have as king. Sometimes Henry doesn't show the moral lifting skills that he is famous for. On his march to Agincourt, Henry's old friend, Bardolph, was needlessly charged with death for 'robbing a church'. Henry just let him be executed seemingly not caring that Bardolph was a good friend and a reminder of his wild and exciting past. Henry treated Bardolph as an 'offender' that did a horrendous crime, which it was not, and took his life for the sake of being an example to the rest of his army. ...read more.

Conclusion

Their marriage signifies the end of the play. In Conclusion, this whole essay presents my opinion. It was extremely hard to balance this essay, as there are many more issues in the play that point to Henry as being more of a noble hero. I do admit, however, that there is a slight element of deviousness in his actions, but they are only necessary steps to being a hero. The play portrays Henry as a real person under pressure and burdened with the responsibility of ruling a country. It seems that he is more servant to his country but presents himself as much more then that as to be careful he does not get a bad image or thrown over, so he can rule England well. I thought that he tried his best and even though he did not feel confident, to defeat France and has an amazing skill of understanding his soldiers, therefore knowing how to lift their morals. Everything he does is noble and heroic, pardoning a few compulsory decisions that can be justified. All in all Henry was a good king and that was how Shakespeare wanted to portray him, only including a sense of deviousness and power to Henry's image to show he can control, only letting his real self slip out once in a while. This keeps the audience interested in the play so they can find out what kind of person Henry is as it unravels his character throughout the play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    The characters he added such as Nym, Bardolph and Pistol, contrast Henry in their conduct and demeanour and subsequently complement his character more in comparison with their own. Shakespeare also supplemented several scenes from pure imagination, scenes such as Katherine's language lesson, the boasting of the French nobles and Henry's

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    So, first of all the reader can see how unfair it is. The poet also makes her feelings clear by the sheer joy she has in telling the employer that she is leaving and from now on she can do her dirty work herself.

  1. Henry V Character Analysis

    Hence the previous contrast outlines the superficiality of the French nobility who clearly underestimate Henry and his men. The Constable claims his certainty that "when he shall see our army/ He'll drop his heart into the sink of fear/ And for achievement offer us his ransom."

  2. Nell Gwyn (Playhouse Cretaures) essay

    Gwyn had to foot the bill. "Od's fish!" she exclaimed, in an imatation of the King's manner of speaking, "but this is the poorest company I ever was in!"[27] Previously having been the mistress of Charles Hart and Charles Sackville, she jokingly titled the King "her Charles the Third".

  1. HENRY V-CRIMINAL OR WAR HERO?

    The church feel they should help pay and offer, so Henry doesn't have to pay and so going to war wouldn't cost him anything. Finally, the Dauphin insults him by sending him a chest of tennis balls. The king has already decided to go to war but this just makes him more determined.

  2. A study in the way Shakespeare presents Henry V

    He also uses the idea of honour as an inspiration tactic for his soldiers, "Dishonour not your mothers' and in doing so reminds his men that honour in war is part of their magnificent heritage that their ancestors were warriors.

  1. Look at the presentation of heroes & villains in the media. Discuss why the ...

    The first hero I am going to look at is James Bond. A hero famous in both films and originally in the novels by Ian Fleming. James Bond is known for being an under cover agent '007'. His duty has always been to protect the world from mass destruction and evil beings.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    As Sommerville (2009) identifies that the plain matter of fact is that the court felt that Henry was deteriorating physically and mentally which is most possibly true. Even though Henry?s subjects grew worried and disturbed of the King?s new behaviour plus his lack of emergency to find a new wife,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work