• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

King Henry V: Noble Hero or Devious Brute?

Extracts from this document...


King Henry V: Noble Hero or Devious Brute? Arguably, William Shakespeare created the historical play, King Henry V for propaganda purposes. Requested by King Henry's distant relative Queen Elizabeth, the play portrays the main character, King Henry, in different aspects and facets. As a playwright of the time, Shakespeare felt he had to turn what was seen as a simple war hero into a complex character to make the play more interesting and to his liking. In this play Henry, upon his father's death, rapidly changed from a wild, boisterous youth, to a responsible, powerful king, faced with the decision of invading France. He won the battle with a small army against a large opposition and from his victory claimed a wife, Princess Katherine, from the French side. This essays intention is to explore Henry's character, whether he has the qualities of a noble hero or a devious brute. We must keep in mind how Shakespeare wanted the audience, perhaps the ruling monarchy at that time, to digest this play and their interpretations of Henry's character. The audience's first impression of Henry is influenced by their first taste of the play, the chorus. Read by the narrator, the chorus sets the scene for each act and summarizes part of the plot, introducing dramatic irony and different themes into the play. ...read more.


The French seem to respect him as a king, apart from the Dauphin who has been shown to be young and na�ve by sending Henry the tennis ball insult that partly triggered this whole siege. As the French king says, the Dauphin is 'Much mistaken in this king (Henry)'. Henry is described by the French king and the Constable with words and phrases like, 'fatal', 'royally', 'courage', 'fierce', 'noble' and 'strong'. These descriptions represent a Henry in a positive light and Shakespeare does this to show that Henry intimidates other rulers. The French, not including the Dauphin, obviously view Henry as something as a strong, noble, caring and influential. Henry shows these also in person by his skill of bringing moral and courage to his army at the siege of Harfleur, which is defiantly a good thing to have as king. Sometimes Henry doesn't show the moral lifting skills that he is famous for. On his march to Agincourt, Henry's old friend, Bardolph, was needlessly charged with death for 'robbing a church'. Henry just let him be executed seemingly not caring that Bardolph was a good friend and a reminder of his wild and exciting past. Henry treated Bardolph as an 'offender' that did a horrendous crime, which it was not, and took his life for the sake of being an example to the rest of his army. ...read more.


Their marriage signifies the end of the play. In Conclusion, this whole essay presents my opinion. It was extremely hard to balance this essay, as there are many more issues in the play that point to Henry as being more of a noble hero. I do admit, however, that there is a slight element of deviousness in his actions, but they are only necessary steps to being a hero. The play portrays Henry as a real person under pressure and burdened with the responsibility of ruling a country. It seems that he is more servant to his country but presents himself as much more then that as to be careful he does not get a bad image or thrown over, so he can rule England well. I thought that he tried his best and even though he did not feel confident, to defeat France and has an amazing skill of understanding his soldiers, therefore knowing how to lift their morals. Everything he does is noble and heroic, pardoning a few compulsory decisions that can be justified. All in all Henry was a good king and that was how Shakespeare wanted to portray him, only including a sense of deviousness and power to Henry's image to show he can control, only letting his real self slip out once in a while. This keeps the audience interested in the play so they can find out what kind of person Henry is as it unravels his character throughout the play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays


    He also uses a lot of repetition at this point to emphasise what he is saying. This just makes Henry even angrier persuading him to go to war. So overall Henry has very strong reasons to go to war with France.

  2. Shakespeare's Henry V

    Cleverly, Henry turns the discussion around, saying that if he were to hang this man for drinking and "railing against our person" then what would be the punishment for a more severe crime, like capital crime. Henry gives them their commissions and says, "Read them, and know I know your worthiness."

  1. Henry V Character Analysis

    In fact Henry refuses any type of ransom, but the dramatic tension conveyed by the French arrogance elevates Henry even higher in the eyes of the audience. Once he wins, it is not only the victory and Henry's leadership that will make him a hero but also the idea that

  2. Charlemagne Essay.

    in 796-7. Ruthlessness is also shown when Charles was at Pamplona, 'he destroyed the walls so that it might not rebel,' says King. King also argues that Charles showed ruthlessness in Saxony 783, where Charles devastated far and wide, again the Franks won in the field.

  1. Henry V is presented as a strong and capable King. Is this an ...

    This wilfulness causes Henry to make decisions that could be described as reckless. In going to war with the French, he risks all of England. England was a country that had its own share of problems at the time. When Henry calls upon the arch bishop of Canterbury for his

  2. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    The characters he added such as Nym, Bardolph and Pistol, contrast Henry in their conduct and demeanour and subsequently complement his character more in comparison with their own. Shakespeare also supplemented several scenes from pure imagination, scenes such as Katherine's language lesson, the boasting of the French nobles and Henry's

  1. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    The poet also shows his anger by the way he ends the poem with a desire to stone the building. He is just as angry now as he was a s a young man. Hope this helps. Submitted by: David Tutty, (Age 16)

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    Chapter 2- ?I like her not!?: Henry?s Wives Henry in 1540 is rather foreshadowed by his extreme transformation in appearance and attitudes in comparison to his younger self. His gallant youth and captivating prince stature was replaced with a decaying bloated, hideously obese, horrible minded man who was rarely seen

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work