• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy. ...read more.

Middle

Macmillan's "never had it so good" speech rang true for many people, who used it as a way to realise that they indeed hadn't been so well-off before, and would be persuaded by that to continue voting for the Conservatives. helping them to dominate elections. Another factor which links to the lifestyle improvements was the greater availability of credit, which led to more people being able to afford mod cons and luxury items. There was a consumer boom during this time, when more people than ever before were able to buy items they previously couldn't afford thanks to the availability of credit; meaning they could pay for an item over a long period of time in small sums. People had not experienced this before and would have seen it as something that was much better than what they had during the Labour government, and they wouldn't want to risk losing these luxuries by voting for what they remembered to be the "rationing party", meaning it was another reason why the Conservatives dominated. ...read more.

Conclusion

wanted larger trade unions and wanted to work this into their policies, which other members of the party disagreed with. Such strong opposition within the party would have reflected negatively on them as a whole, they came across as unreliable and paired with the Conservative's strength during this time, weak too. This aspect of Labour weakness was another reason for which the Conservatives dominated. Overall, the most important reason for the Conservative dominance was the growing prosperity during this time. It was the most significant as it allowed all the other welfare policies to go forward, and without them, the Conservatives wouldn't have succeeded as they did. It led to a rise in wages and the availability of credit and mortgages, meaning people had more disposable income for luxury items and were more likely to get a mortgage, and therefore own their own house. Without these important welfare changes, the public would likely not have been impressed with the Conservatives, as their government would have been similar to that of post-war Labour, which is why it can be perceived as the most important. Although Labour weakness affected the elections, Conservative strength affected it in a much greater way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is a very strong response that demonstrates detailed knowledge and stays focused on the question. Both sides of the argument are considered and there is strong evaluation throughout. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 16/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Asses the most important factors that led to David Lloyd George(TM)s downfall in 1922

    He made the mistake, as Asquith had done before him, of thinking that he was indispensable. Lloyd George was known for his poor handling of foreign affairs, especially the Chanak crisis, which I will mention later in the essay. In an attempt to gain a foreign policy coup in 1922,

  2. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    to refer to, effectively constricting the King a lot further than he had been before. It also forced the king to rely on Parliament because it outlawed forced loans and imprisonment without just cause. The King signed it, but it was to cause him trouble in the future.

  1. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    To do this, an effective system was needed, so adding to the evidence that Henry made this part of government very successful by using direct action and employing the right people around him.

  2. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    Both clearly agree that the pre-war period was significant, however they differ on why it was significant. Pearce's reinterpretation argument makes the most sense because policies like appeasement were relatively popular at the time. Indeed, after signing the Munich Agreement, Chamberlain was heralded as a hero: 'saving' the country from another bloody war.

  1. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    Also, Shakespeare uses extended metaphors in order to distinguish the characteristics between animals and humans, and is also effective in reflecting on which characteristics are better and why. Although there are not a lot of stage directions in this particular scene, the positioning of Henry as being centre stage whilst

  2. Constitutional Nationalism succeeded in achieving its aims whereas revolutionary nationalism failed and cultural nationalism ...

    However, although the rebellion itself seemed to be a dismal failure it is important to consider the success that Emmet achieved in the aftermath of his rebellion and even in his death. The legacy of Emmet and his rebellion on Irish history has had arguably greater impact than the rebellion.

  1. Religion was the most serious problem facing Elizabeth in 1558? How far do you ...

    Therefore Elizabeth needed to marry and produce a Protestant heir otherwise Elizabeth may lose the allegiance of the people who looked to the future. The solution to these problems was discussed at the treaty of Edinburgh. The treaty made France agree to remove troops from Scotland and therefore the threat of war fell.

  2. How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable ...

    This makes the source reliable as the commissioner?s job was to enforce the Amicable Grant and so wouldn?t have spoken badly of it unless there was really a problem. However William may have been influenced by his fear of the people as he was worried about the consequences that would

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work