• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy. ...read more.

Middle

Macmillan's "never had it so good" speech rang true for many people, who used it as a way to realise that they indeed hadn't been so well-off before, and would be persuaded by that to continue voting for the Conservatives. helping them to dominate elections. Another factor which links to the lifestyle improvements was the greater availability of credit, which led to more people being able to afford mod cons and luxury items. There was a consumer boom during this time, when more people than ever before were able to buy items they previously couldn't afford thanks to the availability of credit; meaning they could pay for an item over a long period of time in small sums. People had not experienced this before and would have seen it as something that was much better than what they had during the Labour government, and they wouldn't want to risk losing these luxuries by voting for what they remembered to be the "rationing party", meaning it was another reason why the Conservatives dominated. ...read more.

Conclusion

wanted larger trade unions and wanted to work this into their policies, which other members of the party disagreed with. Such strong opposition within the party would have reflected negatively on them as a whole, they came across as unreliable and paired with the Conservative's strength during this time, weak too. This aspect of Labour weakness was another reason for which the Conservatives dominated. Overall, the most important reason for the Conservative dominance was the growing prosperity during this time. It was the most significant as it allowed all the other welfare policies to go forward, and without them, the Conservatives wouldn't have succeeded as they did. It led to a rise in wages and the availability of credit and mortgages, meaning people had more disposable income for luxury items and were more likely to get a mortgage, and therefore own their own house. Without these important welfare changes, the public would likely not have been impressed with the Conservatives, as their government would have been similar to that of post-war Labour, which is why it can be perceived as the most important. Although Labour weakness affected the elections, Conservative strength affected it in a much greater way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is a very strong response that demonstrates detailed knowledge and stays focused on the question. Both sides of the argument are considered and there is strong evaluation throughout. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 16/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Conservative scandals were the most important reason for why they lost in the 1964 ...

    4 star(s)

    This factor was important as it showed Macmillan to be losing his grip on the party - many questioned why he hadn't launched a full investigation into the case, and criticised his initially cavalier reaction.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    'How far did the changes of the 1960s in Britain create a 'permissive society'?'

    3 star(s)

    Up until the 1960s there was control maintained over the opinions and morals of the people, for example, sexually explicit content in literature was not allowed.

  1. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    Therefore the effectiveness of government would have improved. Henry's government could be seen as effective in different areas and for different aims, and this could relate to the New Monarchy Theory. If the New Monarchy Theory could be applied to his government, then it would increase the chance of it being a success.

  2. Henry VI's weakness as a King Directly Led to the outbreak of war in ...

    Moreover, due to his political incompetence, he let the nobility fight amongst themselves, which ended up backfiring terribly, as when his kingship was threatened by the York's, many of the powerful nobility felt betrayed by their King for not intervening in feuds, and therefore didn't come to his aid.

  1. Religion was the most serious problem facing Elizabeth in 1558? How far do you ...

    Phillip also needs England to trade with therefore this entire problem would affect both party and was unlikely ever to happen as they both needed each other. We also know that Elizabeth had no real interest in Phillip and that marriage would have never have worked.

  2. Why did the Conservatives remain in power between 1951 1964?

    People also preferred conservative policy as they could reap the full reward of their extra bit of wealth. There were also political reasons for why the Conservatives stayed in government for this 13 year period. There was, or what seemed to be, a consensus between Labour and Conservatives.

  1. How well did Pitt deal with the radical threat?

    Also, as mentioned before, his inability to close down the Corresponding Societies only resulted in the numbers of radicals thriving, and so this too can be counted as a slight flaw in Pitt?s changes. Also, possibly one of the most arguable things is that one could say that the extreme

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    Pitt also managed to delay a General election to gain support and make sure that he would get a majority government, he gained the support by impressing MPs and his strategy meant that he was able to reduce the opposition votes and strengthen his political campaign.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work