• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin and his life

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Lenin It has been said, by Winston Churchill no less, that "The Russian people's worst misfortune was his birth; their next was his death." There is much truth in this statement, because Churchill was able to see that as Lenin matured, so did his policies, and these lead to improving conditions for the Russian people. As Lenin matured as a leader, so did his policies; as Lenin died his policies died with him. When Lenin first found himself with power over the Soviets, he was in a Civil war, and from such a situation arose War Communism. Over time however, Lenin was able to see the flaws of this policy and had the maturity to admit that he may have made a mistake. From this the New Economic Policy was born, and conditions in Russia improved immensely. However, Stalin did not have such a capacity to see error, and reverted to pure communism, undoing all of the good work that Lenin had finally managed to achieve. Before Lenin can be seen as the leader of Russia under the Bolshevik party, we must see Lenin as an opportunist. He was ruthless in all of his dealings, and capitalised on every opportunity that came knocking. He used the conditions in Russia at the time, namely the fear and despair created by Germany in WWI. ...read more.

Middle

He had faced opposition from outside of what he controlled, and defeated it, yet he had not even begun to look at things within his power. The efforts of both the White Army and the Red Army had seen the peasants of Russia hard pressed for both food and new recruits. This pressure manifested itself in the Tambov Rebellion, amongst the peasants, and even more so in the Kronstadt Rebellion of March 1921. The rebellion in the military barracks full of some of his most loyal supporters had a shocking effect on Lenin. It was here that Lenin realised that: This peculiar situation demands of us an ability to adopt ourselves...(Russian Revolution. Lenin in October 1917 [www]) This is the time when Lenin realised that his revolution had created a new kind of peasant in Russia, one that was previously politically oblivious for so long, but had been thrown into the throes of political awareness (Russian Revolution. Lenin in October 1917 [www]). Lenin had shown them that they had the power to get what they wanted, and had started on the path to get what Lenin had promised them in the beginning: "Land, Bread, Peace". It was this realisation, this development in maturity that led Lenin to create and introduce the New Economic Policy in the hopes of giving the peasants what they wanted, while staying in power and driving Russia towards true communism. ...read more.

Conclusion

suffering of the Russian people, and a return to the neglect of a leader who did not have the depth of character to see his own flaws. Over fifty years the Russian people have achieved much, and endured much. An industrial transformation in history from Lenin's victory of the civil war to a personal freedom that was greater than at any time under Tsar Nicholas." (Welles ,O. Ten days that shook the world [Video]) This was Lenin's life. He had achieved this for the Russian people while he was alive. However, with his death, the years of suffering and tragedies became for naught, and very soon the peasants of Russia were once again locked in a perpetual stranglehold with no means of escape. In his lifetime, Lenin had proved that he was a wise leader, who had great depth of character. It has been said that "a wise communist will not be afraid of learning from a capitalist". (Lenin's NEP [www]) Lenin proved that he was both very wise and brave, for embracing aspects of capitalism while still retaining his overriding ideals. He was one of the only leaders in history that was able to create policies that suited his people, not who tried to change his people to suit his policies, and for this he will always be remembered as a unique man, who led a people to a new level of freedom, albeit it short lived. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    This is the thrust of Daniels' book, Red October. The most that Daniels is willing to concede to Lenin is this: To this extent there is some truth in the contentions, both Soviet and non-Soviet, that Lenin's leadership was decisive[:] By psychological pressure on his Bolshevik lieutenants and his manipulation

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    and the highest organisation of the Party (Orgburo). * Head of Workers' and Peasants' Inspectorate 1919. This was set up to supervise the civil service and expose inefficiency, corruption, red tape and abuses of power. It gave Stalin the right to intervene in any and every area of government.

  1. War communism and NEP

    The reintroduction of Piecework was met with fierce opposition from the workers who saw it as unfair yet this would increase production in times of need. The reintroduction of Managers caused great fear of return to the old manner of the Tsarist regime.

  2. Assess the Impact Lenin Had On Russia and Its People Lenin was a great ...

    Many Bolshevik leaders were arrested. The Bolsheviks had missed their opportunity to take control of the city and it was Kerensky who came out as Prime Minister. Though, luckily for the Bolsheviks they were given a second chance in the autumn of 1917.

  1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    features: an amazingly fresh and pink face, a little reddish beard, slightly jutting cheek-bones, eyes horizontal but apparently slanted because of the laughter lines, a grey-green gaze at people, and a surpassing air of geniality and cheerful malice..". J. Laver (Coursework Booklet) Stalin was a very unforgiving and untrusting man.

  2. AS Level Edexcel History Spain 1931-33 Revision Notes

    ---- Because by 1931 the church had set themselves so fiercly against any kind of social, economic or political change it was almost inevitable that anticlericalism would be a running theme 1931-36, during the Second Republic ------ The Army The church was dominated by conservative and aristocratic officers ? it was another representative of elites in Spain.

  1. 1798 Irish Rebellion notes

    As many historians have emphasized, the rebellion to unite all Irishmen in fact exacerbated divisions rather than removing them. (Hoppen, p11-16) Politics O'Connell: Innovation and Ambiguity 1. The nature of political life in early nineteenth-century Ireland derived its particular flavour from the fact that conflict between those defending and

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    One way of making the russians suffer was through the workers therefore their respective families would also suffer their problems. Stalin kept wages low, and were usually used as incentives. Wages were usually paid according to how much was produced.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work