• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin and his life

Extracts from this document...


Lenin It has been said, by Winston Churchill no less, that "The Russian people's worst misfortune was his birth; their next was his death." There is much truth in this statement, because Churchill was able to see that as Lenin matured, so did his policies, and these lead to improving conditions for the Russian people. As Lenin matured as a leader, so did his policies; as Lenin died his policies died with him. When Lenin first found himself with power over the Soviets, he was in a Civil war, and from such a situation arose War Communism. Over time however, Lenin was able to see the flaws of this policy and had the maturity to admit that he may have made a mistake. From this the New Economic Policy was born, and conditions in Russia improved immensely. However, Stalin did not have such a capacity to see error, and reverted to pure communism, undoing all of the good work that Lenin had finally managed to achieve. Before Lenin can be seen as the leader of Russia under the Bolshevik party, we must see Lenin as an opportunist. He was ruthless in all of his dealings, and capitalised on every opportunity that came knocking. He used the conditions in Russia at the time, namely the fear and despair created by Germany in WWI. ...read more.


He had faced opposition from outside of what he controlled, and defeated it, yet he had not even begun to look at things within his power. The efforts of both the White Army and the Red Army had seen the peasants of Russia hard pressed for both food and new recruits. This pressure manifested itself in the Tambov Rebellion, amongst the peasants, and even more so in the Kronstadt Rebellion of March 1921. The rebellion in the military barracks full of some of his most loyal supporters had a shocking effect on Lenin. It was here that Lenin realised that: This peculiar situation demands of us an ability to adopt ourselves...(Russian Revolution. Lenin in October 1917 [www]) This is the time when Lenin realised that his revolution had created a new kind of peasant in Russia, one that was previously politically oblivious for so long, but had been thrown into the throes of political awareness (Russian Revolution. Lenin in October 1917 [www]). Lenin had shown them that they had the power to get what they wanted, and had started on the path to get what Lenin had promised them in the beginning: "Land, Bread, Peace". It was this realisation, this development in maturity that led Lenin to create and introduce the New Economic Policy in the hopes of giving the peasants what they wanted, while staying in power and driving Russia towards true communism. ...read more.


suffering of the Russian people, and a return to the neglect of a leader who did not have the depth of character to see his own flaws. Over fifty years the Russian people have achieved much, and endured much. An industrial transformation in history from Lenin's victory of the civil war to a personal freedom that was greater than at any time under Tsar Nicholas." (Welles ,O. Ten days that shook the world [Video]) This was Lenin's life. He had achieved this for the Russian people while he was alive. However, with his death, the years of suffering and tragedies became for naught, and very soon the peasants of Russia were once again locked in a perpetual stranglehold with no means of escape. In his lifetime, Lenin had proved that he was a wise leader, who had great depth of character. It has been said that "a wise communist will not be afraid of learning from a capitalist". (Lenin's NEP [www]) Lenin proved that he was both very wise and brave, for embracing aspects of capitalism while still retaining his overriding ideals. He was one of the only leaders in history that was able to create policies that suited his people, not who tried to change his people to suit his policies, and for this he will always be remembered as a unique man, who led a people to a new level of freedom, albeit it short lived. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    the peasants should be treated more vigorously and forced to produce more. * Lenin's political Testament was 'shelved'; it was not made public and quietly ignored. Why had Stalin amassed such power by 1924? * People's Commissar for Nationalities 1917.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    Although it was a very unpopular set of policies and had many negative outcomes, while in existence it crucially succeeded in keeping the Army supplied which was vital if the Bolsheviks hoped to win the Civil War. The machine behind the Bolshevik party was of course Lenin himself.

  1. Assess the Impact Lenin Had On Russia and Its People Lenin was a great ...

    The Whites - The main enemy of the Communists. These were mainly the noble and the middle-class who wanted the Tsarist regime back. They were named the Whites because Tsarist officers always wore white uniforms. 3. The Greens - These were independent group of nationalists, peasants or bandits who roamed Russia at the time.

  2. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    is highly possible that that the Bolshevik party would not have won the revolution, and the subsequent Communist Soviet Union may not have been established. Similarly, his brilliant leadership qualities and determination, and ruthlessness (e.g. "War Communism"), allowed him and Bolsheviks to preserve their authority and eventually win the Civil War.

  1. Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people.

    ways, there were still some groups of people who didn't benefit from Lenin or communism. For example, obviously anyone in support of the monarchy, peasants living in rural areas, and the middle or upper classes not only didn't gain anything from Lenin's time in power, but lost out because they had to give up their possesions 3.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    It seems clear that if Lenin had not been present in 1917, or if he had chosen to pursue another line of policy, the Mezhraionsty would have remained true to their internationalist ideals and would have continued to oppose both the war and the policies of the Provisional Government.

  1. AS Level Edexcel History Spain 1931-33 Revision Notes

    A common saying was ?Money is a good Catholic? in Spain. The Spanish church, by forming links with the monarchy, had ruined its connection to the people. It had influence over the religious areas in the north but, in the south, attendance at weakly mass was now very low.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    This was the beginning of a vicious civil war which was to tear Russia apart. The struggle was between the Reds (Bolsheviks or Communists)and the Whites(opponents of the Bolsheviks - nobles, democrats, Mensheviks and Socialist.) The reds only aim was to stay in power so that they could build the new Socialist Society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work