• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Lenin leadership was the most important factor in the Bolshevik triumph in 1917.' Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Lenin leadership was the most important factor in the Bolshevik triumph in 1917.' Discuss The country of Russia faced many problems before and after the fall of the Tsarist regime, and some of those still existed after the fall of the Tsarist Regime in Russia. The main problems that faced the Tsar Nicholas II, were extreme poverty for most of the population of Russia and the redemption payments that peasants that the peasants faced. Also there was no freedom of speech and there was a growing sense of nationalism. The effects of the First World War, added to the anxiety and suffering of the Russian people. It also brought food shortages, death and destruction, loss of arable land and there was a low morale in the army, which finally caused the collapse of Tsarist Russia. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin also summed up the solutions to Russia's problems in his slogan: 'Peace, Bread, Land.' The people of Russia wanted peace, and many soldiers deserted from the frontline, with the figure reaching as high as 2 million desertions. Many of the soldiers were returning home, because the peasants back home were seizing land, and as many of the soldiers were peasants, they were eager to get their share of the land. The Provisional Government had set up a Land Commission, which had the objective of redistributing the land, but the Land Commission was dominated by mostly landowners, who were not particularly keen on land reform. Also Lenin had no particular policy on land and just adopted the SR's, to gain the support of the peasants and this caused a division in the SRs. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lenin used the advantage of his small group, who were well disciplined and very loyal. The key positions were seized by the Bolshevik Red Guard units, who were under direction of the Military Revolutionary committee, which was co-ordinated by Trotsky. The Bolsheviks took Petrograd in 3 days, because they faced very little resistance. The success of the Bolshevik Party was determined by many factors, such as the failure of the provisional Government to govern the country and its weaknesses in dealing with threats such as the Kornliov Coup. Also the Bolshevik party itself was well organised and well disciplined, due to the tactics of leader. The involvement of Trotsky in the October Revolution was crucial as he held a key position in the Petrograd Soviet. All these factors did contribute to the Bolshevik success, but in my opinion, without Lenin's influential leadership skills, tactics and organisation of the Bolshevik party, the Bolsheviks could not have gained power in October 1917. By Hyder Mushtaq ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    They would still have had full loyalty to the Tsar and protected him. This would mean that the Tsar would still be in power and the Bolsheviks wouldn't have been able to get power. The unpopularity of the Provisional Government also played a major part in the success of the Bolshevik revolution.

  2. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    In the time immediately after the civil war, Lenin was still a significant figure in Russia, especially because of the New Economic Policy. By the end of 1920, the Bolsheviks were beginning to lose the support of even their closest followers because of the six years of war which had ruined the economy and brought famine to Russia.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    It was clear that they would have to work hard to sustain power and each of the mentioned factors can be linked together to show how the Bolsheviks ably survived the Civil War. An obvious reason for the Bolshevik victory would be their control of a supreme fighting force, this they certainly had.

  2. The Bolshevik Revolution In October-November 1917

    Because the Tsar left the country in such a bad state it caused many problems for the Provisional Government. It is a long term cause because the situation the Tsar put the Provisional Government was a difficult situation for them to control, and hold on to their position of power.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    it painfully obvious that the war could not be won by military means. By the time of the October Revolution, even someone as closely linked to the Provisional Government as Alexander Verkhovsky, the minister of war, could conclude that the situation was hopeless, and that the only way of keeping

  2. Evaluate the role of lenins leadership in the success of the bolshevik revolution of ...

    felt that the Bourgeois in russia were not strong enough to carry out a successful revolution. It was this view that caused the split in the social democrats in 1903, Those that agreed with lenins views on socialism joined the bolsheviks (or Majority)

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    5. The ability to ignore any constitutional guarantee of individual rights. Stalin?s personal contribution: Many historians have argued that some of the characteristics of the USSR had already been put in place by Lenin. They argue that Stalin took these characteristics to the next level.

  2. How important was the Bolshevik threat to Tsardom during the reign of Nicholas II?

    he will reject tomorrow, is incapable of steering the ship of state into a quiet harbour. His outstanding failing is his sad lack of will power.? (Witte S 1912) (Farmer A 2000) p 27 Despite a visit to Great Britain before his accession, where he observed the House of Commons

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work