• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin's Legacy Has Been Grossly Exaggerated; to what extent do you agree with the statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Lenin's Legacy Has Been Grossly Exaggerated" Lenin's Legacy Has Been Grossly Exaggerated; to what extent do you agree with the statement? What is Lenin's legacy? A legacy is defined as: "The gift that an individual leaves, both in the details of their will and in the tradition of giving they shared with their descendents." Therefore Lenin's legacy is what he gave to the people after his death. Could it be a up and coming communist state? Or could it be a release from the class system with a new way of thinking? One of the leading political figures and revolutionary thinkers of the 20th century, Lenin masterminded the Bolshevik take-over of power in Russia in 1917 and was the architect and first head of the Soviet state. He posthumously gave name to the Marxist-Leninist ideology, but by the death of the communist system in 1991, his legacy was largely discredited. Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov grew up in a good educated family in provincial Russia. He excelled at school and went on to study law. At university, he was exposed to radical thinking, and the execution of his older brother, a member of a revolutionary group also influenced his views. ...read more.

Middle

In his declining years, he worried about the bureaucratisation of the regime and also expressed concern over the increasing role of Stalin. He eventually died a great leader who most followed in 1924. After Lenin's death Stalin as the chief leader of the Party and the state creatively applied and developed Marxism-Leninism. In the struggle to defend the legacy of Leninism against its enemies - the Trotskyites, Zinovievities and other bourgeois agents - Stalin expressed the will and wishes of the people and proved himself to be an outstanding Marxist-Leninist fighter. The reason Stalin won the support of the Soviet people and played an important role in history was primarily that he, together with the other leaders of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, brought about the triumph of socialism in the Soviet Union and created the conditions for the victory of the Soviet Union in the war against Hitler; these victories of the Soviet people conformed to the interests of the working class of the world and all progressive mankind. It was therefore quite natural for the name of Stalin to be greatly honoured throughout the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is also a way in which Lenin's Legacy could be grossly exaggerated. Lenin's Legacy has not been grossly exaggerated; this is because people believed that Lenin had led them into a new way of thinking, through revolution. The argument is that Lenin's legacy is the start of communism and that is all he has had to give; Stalin is the one who took communism and changed it into something completely different. Lenin laid down the foundations of communism from 1917-1924 and so therefore has given something to the people after his death to build on. He devoted his efforts into insuring that Marxism could be maintained and to overall reach Utopia. I agree that in some ways Lenin's Legacy has been grossly exaggerated through manipulation of the communist manifesto and through false propaganda. But from a modern day point of view Lenin was an innovator who led the Russian population through revolution and set the standard in modern communism. Stalin used Lenin and a way to get people's attention and he created a soviet state whereas Lenin wanted a communist state and so there is no comparison to say weather his legacy is exaggerated. George Carter 22/09/2004 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The author makes some very interesting analytical judgments but this answer could have been more convincing if reference was made to some of Stalin's key policies (collectivisation, the purging etc) to enable comparison to fully assess Lenin's legacy. 3 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 06/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Weakness of the Directory was the main reasons for Napoleons rise to Power. ...

    5 star(s)

    This meant that the Directory had to increase taxes, upsetting the people, and creating the apathy, which allows Napoleon to rise without a backlash from the public.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the successes and failures of Mussolini's domestic policy.

    5 star(s)

    Women still regarded child birth as very burdensome and, like today, many believed that one or two children were sufficient. Once again, Mussolini's policies failed to excite the nation and failed to change many people's viewpoints. Mussolini also believed that the image of Fascist Italy that foreign nations saw was

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    society?powerful class.? Interestingly, interpretation B mentions that ?rebellious Spain?at best tenuous,? Spain lacked an influential bourgeois class, meaning that the Civil Code was ineffective in states that had a lacking bourgeois class. Showing that only certain subject states, that had already started to industrialize past feudalism, would benefit as a member of Napoleonic Empire.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    Secondly, Calonne believed that the program of economic growth would increase and further the already improved tax yield that would be expected from the administrative reforms. Thus, Calonne proposed the abolishment of internal custom barriers, which never happened. Calonne had hoped to abolish the forced labor taxes for road building, substituting it for an extra tax.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    Stalin also made striking illegal meaning workers had no way of objecting to what Stalin was making them do this meant they could not object to anything and therefore had to work and comply to the rakes Stalin imposed, regardless.

  2. Did napoleon betray the Revolution?

    Napoleon tried to show the nation that there was extreme democracy in France as they got a say in everything that was done, however, plebiscites and elections were rigged more often than not. Napoleon, however, managed to abolish feudalism and increase religious toleration, even though his motives were not to

  1. What impact did war have on the French Revolution 1789-1799?

    The laissez-faire of the Assembly had been replaced with a planned economy. The war effectively led to a dictatorship by the CPS in 1793-1794, as France needed to be organised in order to win the war against such superior forces.

  2. Was the work of Gustav Stresemann the main reason for the Weimar governments ability ...

    While some would suggest this in itself was an obstacle for the government, it is actually far-left radicalism in which helped the Weimar government stay in order. The prospect of a communist revolution was what prompted cooperation between moderate socialists and the far right.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work