• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin's Legacy Has Been Grossly Exaggerated; to what extent do you agree with the statement?

Extracts from this document...


"Lenin's Legacy Has Been Grossly Exaggerated" Lenin's Legacy Has Been Grossly Exaggerated; to what extent do you agree with the statement? What is Lenin's legacy? A legacy is defined as: "The gift that an individual leaves, both in the details of their will and in the tradition of giving they shared with their descendents." Therefore Lenin's legacy is what he gave to the people after his death. Could it be a up and coming communist state? Or could it be a release from the class system with a new way of thinking? One of the leading political figures and revolutionary thinkers of the 20th century, Lenin masterminded the Bolshevik take-over of power in Russia in 1917 and was the architect and first head of the Soviet state. He posthumously gave name to the Marxist-Leninist ideology, but by the death of the communist system in 1991, his legacy was largely discredited. Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov grew up in a good educated family in provincial Russia. He excelled at school and went on to study law. At university, he was exposed to radical thinking, and the execution of his older brother, a member of a revolutionary group also influenced his views. ...read more.


In his declining years, he worried about the bureaucratisation of the regime and also expressed concern over the increasing role of Stalin. He eventually died a great leader who most followed in 1924. After Lenin's death Stalin as the chief leader of the Party and the state creatively applied and developed Marxism-Leninism. In the struggle to defend the legacy of Leninism against its enemies - the Trotskyites, Zinovievities and other bourgeois agents - Stalin expressed the will and wishes of the people and proved himself to be an outstanding Marxist-Leninist fighter. The reason Stalin won the support of the Soviet people and played an important role in history was primarily that he, together with the other leaders of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, brought about the triumph of socialism in the Soviet Union and created the conditions for the victory of the Soviet Union in the war against Hitler; these victories of the Soviet people conformed to the interests of the working class of the world and all progressive mankind. It was therefore quite natural for the name of Stalin to be greatly honoured throughout the world. ...read more.


This is also a way in which Lenin's Legacy could be grossly exaggerated. Lenin's Legacy has not been grossly exaggerated; this is because people believed that Lenin had led them into a new way of thinking, through revolution. The argument is that Lenin's legacy is the start of communism and that is all he has had to give; Stalin is the one who took communism and changed it into something completely different. Lenin laid down the foundations of communism from 1917-1924 and so therefore has given something to the people after his death to build on. He devoted his efforts into insuring that Marxism could be maintained and to overall reach Utopia. I agree that in some ways Lenin's Legacy has been grossly exaggerated through manipulation of the communist manifesto and through false propaganda. But from a modern day point of view Lenin was an innovator who led the Russian population through revolution and set the standard in modern communism. Stalin used Lenin and a way to get people's attention and he created a soviet state whereas Lenin wanted a communist state and so there is no comparison to say weather his legacy is exaggerated. George Carter 22/09/2004 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The author makes some very interesting analytical judgments but this answer could have been more convincing if reference was made to some of Stalin's key policies (collectivisation, the purging etc) to enable comparison to fully assess Lenin's legacy. 3 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 06/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    Thirdly, he proposed once more to relax governmental controls on the grain trade, going further than either Turgot or any of his forefathers of the 1760's in allowing free export both internally and externally. All these reforms, whether administrative or economic, could not be expected to show instant results whatever their long term benefits were expected to be.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45?

    4 star(s)

    The aims of the four year plan were to prepare for war and establish autarky by expanding domestic production, developing substitutes and expanding abroad. They also extended government controls and expanded armament. The success over the years of the four year plan was mixed.

  1. Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period ...

    The first two Duma's contained a large amount of opponents intent on reform and just as Lenin dissolved the Constituent Assembly, the first two Dumas met the same fate. Nicholas II was keen to maintain autocracy as his predecessors had been.

  2. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    'I can reign without ministers.'12 This distaste for constitutions among the eastern powers was further shown by Russia, Prussia and Austria all refusing to adopt one. Thus, the statesmen did make some provisions for liberalism, but the reactionary attitudes of Russia and Austria, can be considered a failure of the settlement, and hence provides some support of the view.

  1. What impact did war have on the French Revolution 1789-1799?

    The laissez-faire of the Assembly had been replaced with a planned economy. The war effectively led to a dictatorship by the CPS in 1793-1794, as France needed to be organised in order to win the war against such superior forces.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon an enlightened despot?

    1800, the 75 French newspapers in existence were cut to just 13, and those remaining paper editors were forced to swear an oath of allegiance to Napoleon. By 1810, all newspaper in France had to acquire licenses to print in Paris, and there also just one official paper, 'Le Moniteur'.

  1. Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?

    In response a number of so-called 'intentionalist' historians have argued that the chaos created in the political structure was not a sign of weakness on Hitler's part but a deliberate policy by him.

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    Russia in 1904-05 had fought the Russo-Japanese war against the Japanese, and had suffered a humiliating defeat, especially as the Japanese at that time were considered to be very weak. The First World War had an immense similarity to that of the Russo-Japanese War and caused unrest in all sections of Russia's society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work