• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin's Legacy Has Been Grossly Exaggerated; to what extent do you agree with the statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Lenin's Legacy Has Been Grossly Exaggerated" Lenin's Legacy Has Been Grossly Exaggerated; to what extent do you agree with the statement? What is Lenin's legacy? A legacy is defined as: "The gift that an individual leaves, both in the details of their will and in the tradition of giving they shared with their descendents." Therefore Lenin's legacy is what he gave to the people after his death. Could it be a up and coming communist state? Or could it be a release from the class system with a new way of thinking? One of the leading political figures and revolutionary thinkers of the 20th century, Lenin masterminded the Bolshevik take-over of power in Russia in 1917 and was the architect and first head of the Soviet state. He posthumously gave name to the Marxist-Leninist ideology, but by the death of the communist system in 1991, his legacy was largely discredited. Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov grew up in a good educated family in provincial Russia. He excelled at school and went on to study law. At university, he was exposed to radical thinking, and the execution of his older brother, a member of a revolutionary group also influenced his views. ...read more.

Middle

In his declining years, he worried about the bureaucratisation of the regime and also expressed concern over the increasing role of Stalin. He eventually died a great leader who most followed in 1924. After Lenin's death Stalin as the chief leader of the Party and the state creatively applied and developed Marxism-Leninism. In the struggle to defend the legacy of Leninism against its enemies - the Trotskyites, Zinovievities and other bourgeois agents - Stalin expressed the will and wishes of the people and proved himself to be an outstanding Marxist-Leninist fighter. The reason Stalin won the support of the Soviet people and played an important role in history was primarily that he, together with the other leaders of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, brought about the triumph of socialism in the Soviet Union and created the conditions for the victory of the Soviet Union in the war against Hitler; these victories of the Soviet people conformed to the interests of the working class of the world and all progressive mankind. It was therefore quite natural for the name of Stalin to be greatly honoured throughout the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is also a way in which Lenin's Legacy could be grossly exaggerated. Lenin's Legacy has not been grossly exaggerated; this is because people believed that Lenin had led them into a new way of thinking, through revolution. The argument is that Lenin's legacy is the start of communism and that is all he has had to give; Stalin is the one who took communism and changed it into something completely different. Lenin laid down the foundations of communism from 1917-1924 and so therefore has given something to the people after his death to build on. He devoted his efforts into insuring that Marxism could be maintained and to overall reach Utopia. I agree that in some ways Lenin's Legacy has been grossly exaggerated through manipulation of the communist manifesto and through false propaganda. But from a modern day point of view Lenin was an innovator who led the Russian population through revolution and set the standard in modern communism. Stalin used Lenin and a way to get people's attention and he created a soviet state whereas Lenin wanted a communist state and so there is no comparison to say weather his legacy is exaggerated. George Carter 22/09/2004 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The author makes some very interesting analytical judgments but this answer could have been more convincing if reference was made to some of Stalin's key policies (collectivisation, the purging etc) to enable comparison to fully assess Lenin's legacy. 3 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 06/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    Explaining why the earlier, more useful for Napoleon at that time, nations proved to benefit more under the Empire. Kingdom of Spain was the last acquisition to the Napoleonic Empire and the main reason for that was to extend Napoleon?s continental blockade against Britain.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the successes and failures of Mussolini's domestic policy.

    5 star(s)

    Sport was highly prized by Mussolini, who wanted to provoke patriotism within Italy, and admiration outside. In 1925, he set up the Dopolavoro, an organisation for 'the healthy and profitable occupation of the worker's leisure hours.'

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45?

    4 star(s)

    The production of key materials had expanded to a reasonable rate, or greatly. However, the production of other materials never reached the levels desired by the armed forces and Hitler. It was successful in the way in which Germany's imports had not increased, however this still meant that Germany was

  2. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    Also, many of the politicians underestimated Stalin due to the fact that he was very quiet and never participated that much, this led to him being described as a 'grey blur' by his political colleagues. As a consequence he was able to do many things, such as form a triumvirate with Kamenev and Zinoviev, and not get noticed.

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    This naturally leads to the question, was Bismarck a product of German society, or was German society a product of Bismarck? To some extent, one can clearly argue that German society is a product of Bismarck, for clearly it would not have existed in such great unity if it were not for Bismarck.

  2. What impact did war have on the French Revolution 1789-1799?

    The laissez-faire of the Assembly had been replaced with a planned economy. The war effectively led to a dictatorship by the CPS in 1793-1794, as France needed to be organised in order to win the war against such superior forces.

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    old one, as the union of 39 states forming the German confederation was retained. On the other hand, the settlement has been unfairly condemned for ignoring liberal and national principles, as concessions were clearly made. The French monarchy was restored with a Charter, making it more liberal than any other country of Continental Europe.

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    Chamberlain was well aware what a world war would do to Britain and her Empire. Appeasement had been the policy adopted by the British government since the signing of Versailles. Most British governments felt a sense of guilt associated with Versailles and tried to distance themselves from it at every opportunity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work