• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


?Lenin?s leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917?. How far do you agree? The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917 for a variety of contributing factors. The weaknesses of the Provisional Government brought forward by their inability to deal with land and food issues, and their failure to end the war, made them unpopular and distrusted amongst the Russian people. Lenin?s ability to capitalise on the Provisional Government?s mistakes and ability to inspire and drive his party undoubtedly was also detriment to Bolshevik success. Alternatively, one could argue that other factors such as the Kornilov revolt and the part played by Trotsky, contributed to the success of the Bolsheviks. Although Lenin was a great orator and had the ability to inspire others in a united course, his leadership was not the most important factor contributing to Bolshevik success. Lenin acted as a trigger, capitalizing on the faults of the Provisional Government; Lenin promised ?peace, bread and land?, the three things the Provisional Government had failed to provide. Lenin?s leadership was pivotal in the success of the Bolsheviks. He was a dedicated, determined and capable leader. ...read more.


One of the major weaknesses of the Provisional Government was its lack of credibility and authority. For the masses of Russian people the government did not bring any immediate change. They were unable to distinguish themselves from the Tsar?s government; in fact many in the government were also in the government of the Tsar including the leader Prince Lvov, Milyukov, leader of the Kadets and Kerensky, war minister. Association with the Tsar made them unpopular and distrusted from the start. The Soviets had a better claim to legitimacy as they had been formed from representatives of the workers; an idea that the Bolsheviks used as a vehicle to gain legitimate power. The weaknesses of the Provisional Government was the main reason for Bolshevik success. Their political and social failures ultimately allowed Lenin and the Bolsheviks the opportunity to gain popularity amongst the industrial and peasant classes, whilst destroying the reputation of those parties affiliated with them. Had the Provisional Government been able to end the war and re-establish command over the army, then they would have been able to restore order in Petrograd and arrest the Bolsheviks, alike what Kornilov attempted. Another aspect contributing to the Provisional Government?s failure was the decisions made by their Prime Minister, Kerensky. ...read more.


Although, Trotsky?s role was important to Bolshevik success, it can be deemed a contributing factor. If it were not for the inability of provisional Government to provide its own, reliable military the MRC would have been largely ineffective. Similarly, the weaknesses of the Soviet in allowing Trotsky and the Bolsheviks to dominate can all be considered the underlying factors. Undoubtedly Lenin?s leadership was detriment to Bolshevik success, his ability to inspire and unite the Bolsheviks created a new breed of politician: utterly self-confident, scornful of all other parties and ideas and totally loyal to their leader, without him the party may never have been able to fully capitalise on the mistakes made by the Provisional Government, under Kamenev?s leadership they may have merged with Mensheviks and been consigned to the ?garbage heap of history?. The effect of the Kornilov Revolt and the role of Trotsky are contributing factors to the October Revolution. However, the underlying reason for the success of the Bolsheviks is the failures of the Provisional Government. Their inability to address Russia?s problems gave Lenin and the Bolsheviks the opportunity to gain the support of not only the people of Petrograd, but of Russia. Lenin?s role was a trigger factor, capitalising on the government?s mistakes and seizing the opportunity provided. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    The use of horse artillery giving greater mobility to the guns, and the new practice of concentrating artillery fire in a barrage to open up gaps in the enemy front line for infantry or cavalry to attack, where tactics of which Napoleon made good use, especially after 1806 as armies grew larger.

  2. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    So far I have mentioned many aspects of what people felt and what the effects were of certain events on the fall of the Romanovs. All have been prominent, yet most have one major underlying factor which helped increase the negative feelings of the people in Russia on the 300 year old dynasty; the First World War.

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    This had already come to light in the previous revolutions of 1905 and, perhaps more significantly, February 1917. Lenin was not involved in these revolutions - he was even caught by surprise by the February revolution - and so it could be argued that, as they had done it before,

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    The two bodies initially shared power and cooperated to a certain extent as the Provisional Government had the political direction and policies that the Soviet lacked, while the Soviet had the political power and legitimacy of an elected organisation that the Provisional Government did not.

  1. To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917?

    By the increase of Bolshevik members from 25,000 in February to 75,000 in April, it is clear that Lenin was performing as a very able leader for the Bolshevik party. Even with this huge increase of support, he still realised that this platform wasn't sufficient enough to perform a launch for power.

  2. Lenin's leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power ...

    Due to temporary nature of the Provisional Government, they refused to make important decisions about Russia. This angered the peasants as nothing was done about Land; this allowed Lenin to effectively reach out to the peasants; boosting the popularity of the Bolsheviks.

  1. Assess Lenin's strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

    The following day, Lenin then introduced the April theses, Lenin made promises to the people on what was to be done, and what the provisional government were not doing. This gained the Bolsheviks mass support from the soldiers, workers and peasantry.

  2. To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917? ...

    Making their views feel unheard and rejected. Furthermore, the provisional government had failed to satisfy the Russians when it came to the issue of land among other things. This was a sensitive area, and the fact that Lenin had been able to develop, or at least a position, unlike the government, made it very easy for the Bolsheviks to swoop in and take the power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work