• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


?Lenin?s leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917?. How far do you agree? The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917 for a variety of contributing factors. The weaknesses of the Provisional Government brought forward by their inability to deal with land and food issues, and their failure to end the war, made them unpopular and distrusted amongst the Russian people. Lenin?s ability to capitalise on the Provisional Government?s mistakes and ability to inspire and drive his party undoubtedly was also detriment to Bolshevik success. Alternatively, one could argue that other factors such as the Kornilov revolt and the part played by Trotsky, contributed to the success of the Bolsheviks. Although Lenin was a great orator and had the ability to inspire others in a united course, his leadership was not the most important factor contributing to Bolshevik success. Lenin acted as a trigger, capitalizing on the faults of the Provisional Government; Lenin promised ?peace, bread and land?, the three things the Provisional Government had failed to provide. Lenin?s leadership was pivotal in the success of the Bolsheviks. He was a dedicated, determined and capable leader. ...read more.


One of the major weaknesses of the Provisional Government was its lack of credibility and authority. For the masses of Russian people the government did not bring any immediate change. They were unable to distinguish themselves from the Tsar?s government; in fact many in the government were also in the government of the Tsar including the leader Prince Lvov, Milyukov, leader of the Kadets and Kerensky, war minister. Association with the Tsar made them unpopular and distrusted from the start. The Soviets had a better claim to legitimacy as they had been formed from representatives of the workers; an idea that the Bolsheviks used as a vehicle to gain legitimate power. The weaknesses of the Provisional Government was the main reason for Bolshevik success. Their political and social failures ultimately allowed Lenin and the Bolsheviks the opportunity to gain popularity amongst the industrial and peasant classes, whilst destroying the reputation of those parties affiliated with them. Had the Provisional Government been able to end the war and re-establish command over the army, then they would have been able to restore order in Petrograd and arrest the Bolsheviks, alike what Kornilov attempted. Another aspect contributing to the Provisional Government?s failure was the decisions made by their Prime Minister, Kerensky. ...read more.


Although, Trotsky?s role was important to Bolshevik success, it can be deemed a contributing factor. If it were not for the inability of provisional Government to provide its own, reliable military the MRC would have been largely ineffective. Similarly, the weaknesses of the Soviet in allowing Trotsky and the Bolsheviks to dominate can all be considered the underlying factors. Undoubtedly Lenin?s leadership was detriment to Bolshevik success, his ability to inspire and unite the Bolsheviks created a new breed of politician: utterly self-confident, scornful of all other parties and ideas and totally loyal to their leader, without him the party may never have been able to fully capitalise on the mistakes made by the Provisional Government, under Kamenev?s leadership they may have merged with Mensheviks and been consigned to the ?garbage heap of history?. The effect of the Kornilov Revolt and the role of Trotsky are contributing factors to the October Revolution. However, the underlying reason for the success of the Bolsheviks is the failures of the Provisional Government. Their inability to address Russia?s problems gave Lenin and the Bolsheviks the opportunity to gain the support of not only the people of Petrograd, but of Russia. Lenin?s role was a trigger factor, capitalising on the government?s mistakes and seizing the opportunity provided. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    The peasants were also clamouring for land and Lenin was able to prise support away from the Provisional Government without any official actions. Land reform for the Provisional Government was not a priority, and in hindsight it should have been.

  2. The 1917 Revolution.

    The "July Days" The people on the streets of Petrograd clearly did not agree with the delegates for in the factories, the workers called for "All Power to the Soviets." There were demonstrations and attempts to persuade the soldiers in the city to back up the workers.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    As time progressed the Provisional Government found itself more and more opposed to the Soviet and their position became increasingly shakier as it became clear that the Provisional Government were committed to fighting the War. This created problems with the Soviet because it contained soldiers among its delegates.

  2. To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917?

    By the increase of Bolshevik members from 25,000 in February to 75,000 in April, it is clear that Lenin was performing as a very able leader for the Bolshevik party. Even with this huge increase of support, he still realised that this platform wasn't sufficient enough to perform a launch for power.

  1. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    As Dockrill stated "Stalingrad marked the beginning of the end for Germany." The Soviet generals (for example Konev, Molotov, etc.) had many ideas and tactics that were put into action. They adapted quickly by putting minesweepers on tanks and also used camouflage and deception to set up for Operation Bagration.

  2. Assess Lenins strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

    Lenin was pragmatic; a utopian thinker, but one who was able to adjust his policies in the interests of political survival.

  1. Lenin's leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power ...

    the Bolsheviks to grow in popularity and strength as they played on the mistakes of the Government. The nature of the Government itself was illegitimate because they were the remnants of the last Duma which was the result of a rigged election.

  2. To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917? ...

    The Kornilov Affair also contributed to the Bolshevik success, Kerensky having to release the imprisoned Bolsheviks and provide them arms to defend the nation basically made them viewed as the protectors of the capital and the Revolution. This also further revealed the weaknesses of the Provisional government and presented the Bolsheviks as the right party to rule.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work