• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lincoln's Election. Sources A, C and E support the assertion which says Lincolns election meant that armed conflict between North and South became unavoidable.

Extracts from this document...


Sources A, C and E support the assertion which says Lincoln's election meant that armed conflict between North and South became unavoidable. This can be proven in source A, when the South started blaming the North. The South accused the North of robbing their property, which were slaves. Other than that they also claimed the North of murdering their citizens who were trying to get back their property, as it was constitutional. This was made worse when they elected Abraham Lincoln who was always against slavery as President. This obviously angered the South because they believed that by electing him as President, the South would lose control over their slave states. Thus, secession would have been inevitable. Even though, in source A it was not stated that the South actually wanted to secede. There was also no mention of armed conflict between the North and the South. Same goes to source B, that armed conflict nor secession was mentioned. ...read more.


Later on, John Crittenden proposed that the Missouri Compromise line remained so that slavery would still be allow below it. Lincoln later shut down the proposal. This would not only anger the South but at the same inflict the thought of seceding. At the same time, Source E also challenges when it says that the Upper Southern states didn't want to secede because those states would have to be the battleground if a war was to occur. Also, due to the lack of Southern unity it was obviously hard for the South to cause an armed conflict therefore the assertion could be wrong. The New Orleans Daily Crescent in 1860, a slave state in the South, wrote source A. The origin of this source solidifies the assertion because it shows the Southern point of view although it is biased. While source C is one of the resolutions on secession from Floyd County, Georgia a state, which was named free and could secede whenever she wanted to. ...read more.


Even though the congress had made a misconception on the South, he still believed that holding on to the Union would be a wise thing to do as it affected their safety. Despite that, this source also shows a hint of support to the assertion as the Senator had to reassure in an urgent manner to hold on to the Union as he already thought the South was on their way of seceding. Alexander Stephens, who challenged the assertion, wrote source B in 1860, later became the Vice-President of the Confederate States of America. This shows that the South actually seceded and that the will of the majority also changed in the end because by then Lincoln was already elected as President. Source D, a source written by Senator Crittenden from a slave state, Kentucky was a final plea for peace. This shows that the South was really desperate to stay in the Union as they didn't want to secede. In conclusion, none of the sources directly mentioned secession or armed conflict therefore the assertion should have been Lincoln's election caused divergence between the South and the North. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    five known manuscripts differ in some small detail, and the scripts written by Lincoln also differ slightly. The version I have chosen to use is known as the 'Bliss' version. It was written by Lincoln after the speech, and is viewed by many as the standard text.

  2. John Browns Reign of Terrorism John Brown was an American Abolitionist who promoted ...

    He viewed his decisions as intelligent and his methods to eradicate slavery strong, when in fact he endangered the lives of others including his children. Although he was willing to die for a specific cause John Brown wasn't afraid to harm those who were in his way.

  1. To what extent do you agree with Abraham Lincoln that slavery was 'somehow the ...

    the peculiar institution he was referring to was slavery. The main state right that the South were fighting for was the right to keep their slaves. The South believed that it was their right to be able to keep their slaves and so they created the Confederacy in order to do this.

  2. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    Being Leftist in orientation, the Liberals looked to the American ideal of freedom and enormous wealth, while the Conservatives had mourned the loss of this fabulously endowed colony to a handful of people, who in their opinion were renegades who had nothing but total scorn and irreverence to the Empire.

  1. Assess the Generalship of Robert E. Lee

    Thousands were slaughtered, with nothing gained. This kind of uncalculated waste leads the revisionists to their conclusion that Lee was unable to forecast and see the bigger picture. As Shelby Foote said "Gettysburg was the price the South paid for having Robert E.

  2. To what extent did the American Civil War succeed in removing the two main ...

    This was achieved through sharecropping. Useless land was given to blacks who could take a share of the crop. The planters could therefore bring land to production without paid labour, whilst at the same time giving the chance for the black man to work under his own supervision and to

  1. What was Lincoln's motive in issuing the Emancipating proclamation?

    So again, Lincoln will be able to continue the war with the Confederate government. Furthermore, there is a movement of republicans press Lincoln to free the slave. These radical republicans hate slaveholders. They blamed them that they started the war.

  2. a) "How far do these sources support the view expressed in source one that, ...

    4 - "ravaged and laid waste to the shire". There is no implication of conciliation from William. Source two is inadequate due to it only covering one year, it does not take into account events outside of 1069. The Anglo authors of the chronicle could be biased towards the Normans, exaggerating the truth, leaving out appeasement by William I.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work