• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lincoln's Election. Sources A, C and E support the assertion which says Lincolns election meant that armed conflict between North and South became unavoidable.

Extracts from this document...


Sources A, C and E support the assertion which says Lincoln's election meant that armed conflict between North and South became unavoidable. This can be proven in source A, when the South started blaming the North. The South accused the North of robbing their property, which were slaves. Other than that they also claimed the North of murdering their citizens who were trying to get back their property, as it was constitutional. This was made worse when they elected Abraham Lincoln who was always against slavery as President. This obviously angered the South because they believed that by electing him as President, the South would lose control over their slave states. Thus, secession would have been inevitable. Even though, in source A it was not stated that the South actually wanted to secede. There was also no mention of armed conflict between the North and the South. Same goes to source B, that armed conflict nor secession was mentioned. ...read more.


Later on, John Crittenden proposed that the Missouri Compromise line remained so that slavery would still be allow below it. Lincoln later shut down the proposal. This would not only anger the South but at the same inflict the thought of seceding. At the same time, Source E also challenges when it says that the Upper Southern states didn't want to secede because those states would have to be the battleground if a war was to occur. Also, due to the lack of Southern unity it was obviously hard for the South to cause an armed conflict therefore the assertion could be wrong. The New Orleans Daily Crescent in 1860, a slave state in the South, wrote source A. The origin of this source solidifies the assertion because it shows the Southern point of view although it is biased. While source C is one of the resolutions on secession from Floyd County, Georgia a state, which was named free and could secede whenever she wanted to. ...read more.


Even though the congress had made a misconception on the South, he still believed that holding on to the Union would be a wise thing to do as it affected their safety. Despite that, this source also shows a hint of support to the assertion as the Senator had to reassure in an urgent manner to hold on to the Union as he already thought the South was on their way of seceding. Alexander Stephens, who challenged the assertion, wrote source B in 1860, later became the Vice-President of the Confederate States of America. This shows that the South actually seceded and that the will of the majority also changed in the end because by then Lincoln was already elected as President. Source D, a source written by Senator Crittenden from a slave state, Kentucky was a final plea for peace. This shows that the South was really desperate to stay in the Union as they didn't want to secede. In conclusion, none of the sources directly mentioned secession or armed conflict therefore the assertion should have been Lincoln's election caused divergence between the South and the North. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    * Ellipses * Superlatives/comparatives * Conjunctions * Personal pronouns * Facts and Figures * Lexical and semantic fields * Uses of different lexis * Different tones * Awareness of audience I am expecting to find features that dramatises the speech, and are emphatic.

  2. In mid 19th century, Abraham Lincoln's three speeches mirrored the changes in his ideals ...

    Taney, declared that all blacks -- slaves as well as free -- were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permiting slavery in all of the country's territories.

  1. John Browns Reign of Terrorism John Brown was an American Abolitionist who promoted ...

    There were no justifications to the crime John Brown committed, it is not defendable saying, it was done to free slaves considering the Doyle's did not own any.

  2. To what extent do you agree with Abraham Lincoln that slavery was 'somehow the ...

    However, as nationalism was probably more important to the North this meant that they saw Lincoln as their candidate as he represented their views. After the election the Confederacy was created, and many of the South felt driven to join .

  1. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    In the years leading to the elections of 1868, public opinion in Britain was strongly divided between the Leftist Liberals and the Conservatives. The Civil War in America had provided a strong impetus for the polarisation of Britain's leading political parties.

  2. Assess the Generalship of Robert E. Lee

    Thousands were slaughtered, with nothing gained. This kind of uncalculated waste leads the revisionists to their conclusion that Lee was unable to forecast and see the bigger picture. As Shelby Foote said "Gettysburg was the price the South paid for having Robert E.

  1. To what extent did the American Civil War succeed in removing the two main ...

    22 1862: "All persons held as slaves within any state, or designated part of a state... shall be... forever free" This however, did not free them from the racism and discrimination that their emancipation incited. The Southern image of the Negro was shaped by their slave past, and therefore the image had not changed despite the war.

  2. Civil Rights Revision Cards 1945-68

    BUT ? agreement finally reached in B fell short of original SCLC demands ? eg ? ?gradual? hiring of black employees and desegregation of facilities, school desegregation left untouched. King accused of ?token? gains. (7) March on Washington ? 250,000 people (quarter = white, shows how successful King had been in gaining support of white pop.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work