• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lincoln's Election. Sources A, C and E support the assertion which says Lincolns election meant that armed conflict between North and South became unavoidable.

Extracts from this document...


Sources A, C and E support the assertion which says Lincoln's election meant that armed conflict between North and South became unavoidable. This can be proven in source A, when the South started blaming the North. The South accused the North of robbing their property, which were slaves. Other than that they also claimed the North of murdering their citizens who were trying to get back their property, as it was constitutional. This was made worse when they elected Abraham Lincoln who was always against slavery as President. This obviously angered the South because they believed that by electing him as President, the South would lose control over their slave states. Thus, secession would have been inevitable. Even though, in source A it was not stated that the South actually wanted to secede. There was also no mention of armed conflict between the North and the South. Same goes to source B, that armed conflict nor secession was mentioned. ...read more.


Later on, John Crittenden proposed that the Missouri Compromise line remained so that slavery would still be allow below it. Lincoln later shut down the proposal. This would not only anger the South but at the same inflict the thought of seceding. At the same time, Source E also challenges when it says that the Upper Southern states didn't want to secede because those states would have to be the battleground if a war was to occur. Also, due to the lack of Southern unity it was obviously hard for the South to cause an armed conflict therefore the assertion could be wrong. The New Orleans Daily Crescent in 1860, a slave state in the South, wrote source A. The origin of this source solidifies the assertion because it shows the Southern point of view although it is biased. While source C is one of the resolutions on secession from Floyd County, Georgia a state, which was named free and could secede whenever she wanted to. ...read more.


Even though the congress had made a misconception on the South, he still believed that holding on to the Union would be a wise thing to do as it affected their safety. Despite that, this source also shows a hint of support to the assertion as the Senator had to reassure in an urgent manner to hold on to the Union as he already thought the South was on their way of seceding. Alexander Stephens, who challenged the assertion, wrote source B in 1860, later became the Vice-President of the Confederate States of America. This shows that the South actually seceded and that the will of the majority also changed in the end because by then Lincoln was already elected as President. Source D, a source written by Senator Crittenden from a slave state, Kentucky was a final plea for peace. This shows that the South was really desperate to stay in the Union as they didn't want to secede. In conclusion, none of the sources directly mentioned secession or armed conflict therefore the assertion should have been Lincoln's election caused divergence between the South and the North. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Why did Lincoln's election in 1860 lead to Civil War in 1861?

    The inability of the Democrats to decide on a single candidate, which would carry votes not only in the South but also in the North, meant that both Democrats and the South were doomed from the start of the election campaign.

  2. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    By listening to it, I think I will also understand his purpose better. I will also watch a video of the speech, as that will allow me to view paralinguistic features of the speech. I plan to do this because I think paralinguistic features will be used by King to

  1. John Browns Reign of Terrorism John Brown was an American Abolitionist who promoted ...

    He advocated repression and violence in order to obtain an equal society. Brown premeditated this raid for months with a group of abolitionist men who used military maneuvers to attack. Brown was unsuccessful in this raid. He was captured and arrested.

  2. To what extent did the American Civil War succeed in removing the two main ...

    The Civil War destroyed two thirds of Southern wealth, which was worsened by a population rise in the South, thus impoverishing the South. This was in direct juxtaposition with the North, who got economic benefits from the secession. It became easier for the North to go ahead with construction, for

  1. Abraham Lincoln.

    After 6 months of plotting and recruiting 6 men had tried to capture Lincoln but were unsuccessful. Booth planned to Lincoln while Lewis Payne would kill secretary of State Seward.

  2. a) "How far do these sources support the view expressed in source one that, ...

    Source five also disagrees with the statement recounting how William "ruined" Norwich, and blinded some of the traitors. The source is partial due to it covering only one date and the account of the situation is brief, and may exaggerate the Norman methods.

  1. "How Did The Election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 lead to the Secession of ...

    This collective South justified the action of secession by citing a people's "right to revolution." Secessionist arguments incorporated the theory of states rights in their justifications for secession. The theory of states rights declares that each state is independent, equal and sovereign.

  2. To what extent do you agree with Abraham Lincoln that slavery was 'somehow the ...

    In fact, Lincoln privately thought that slavery would last one hundred more years and he didn't plan to abolish it immediately. Lincoln would also not have been able to abolish slavery immediately because the Republicans did not have the majority of Congress in 1860.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work