• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lincoln vs. Davis in the Civil War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Lincoln vs. Davis in the Civil War Both Lincoln and Davis were effective leaders in their own right but we must measure their respective achievements in terms of the extent to which they overcame the different challenges they faced. Lincoln's was to employ the full capacity of the North's superior resources whilst unifying disparate Northern opinions behind the war effort. He also had to preclude Britain's involvement in the war; if Britain took sides and aided the South, the North would be facing a far greater adversity. Davis' challenge was to solicit Britain's help and maintain support, both within his cabinet and, more generally, within the South. Of course, he also had to muster all the resources and supplies that the southern economy had to offer, while sustaining the war effort for some length of time at least. We can compare both leaders had by observing their success in fulfilling four requirements: the mobilisation of the war effort; the mobilisation of the home front; strategies and military appointments; and diplomacy. One factor to consider was each leader's mobilisation of the war effort. As we have said, Lincoln's primary objective was to bring to bear upon the South the full extent of the North's resources. He managed to raise two billion dollars in bonds with which to invest in the war effort and equip the Army of the Potomac. ...read more.

Middle

Lincoln ordered thousands of arrests, kept political enemies in prison without bringing charges against them, refused these hapless men their right to trial by a jury of their peers, and ignored orders from the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to release them. In his first few months in office he made the most direct violations of the Constitution in the Nation's history. He increased the size of the Regular Army without Congressional approval, spent money without Congressional authorisation, suspended the writ of habeas corpus without authority and avoided consultation with the other two branches of the government. He neglected the Constitution but managed to retain the popular appeal of the masses. Davis, contrarily, was handicapped by the excessive individualism which characterised the South's ruling classes and did little to disband these divisions. The individualism was a product of the plantation system. Each planter was in effect a petty sovereign and his exalted status tended to make him self-reliant, proud, resentful of opposition, and averse to teamwork. Davis lacked popular appeal. At no time in his life did he mingle freely with the masses under circumstances that might have enabled him to develop an appreciation of their aspirations and virtues. He never felt close to them, nor they to him. ...read more.

Conclusion

They fought McClellan to a standstill with their backs to the Potomac. They remained on the field for another day, when they could have retreated. Lee gave Davis all of the ammunition required for a diplomatic stratagem. Nothing Lee or the other war heroes of the Confederacy did on the battlefield measured up to what Lincoln did with manipulating public opinion both home and abroad. In making comparisons with the Revolutionary War, which many historians prefer to do, it will be remembered that the future of the Revolution looked bleak until the Continental army's victory over the British and Hessians at Saratoga. However, this victory alone accomplished nothing. It was very important to have strong statesmen in foreign capitals extolling the accomplishments of the armies in the field. At this, the Continental Congress was very proficient but the Confederate diplomats were not so perceptive. Quite simply the South failed to attain the only asset that would enable victory. In summary, Lincoln was superior in the areas of leadership that mattered most. He was better war leader, with the courage and tenacity to go to great lengths to achieve victory. Davis was perhaps too cautious in some respects but he cannot be solely imputed for the South's defeat since there are many aspects of leadership that he fulfilled adequately; there were circumstances that could not be overcome and determined that the South would lose despite Davis' best efforts. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitler's foreign policy consistent and planned?

    It stated that Austrian government would except German control of foreign policy in return of a weak promise to maintain the independence of Austria. This ties in completely with Hitler's early foreign policy aims indicating again that there are goals to be aimed for, it's just a case of doing whatever is necessary and manipulating situations to achieve these goals.

  2. Abraham Lincoln.

    After 6 months of plotting and recruiting 6 men had tried to capture Lincoln but were unsuccessful. Booth planned to Lincoln while Lewis Payne would kill secretary of State Seward.

  1. Abraham Lincoln: The Man, the Emancipator

    In 1830 Lincoln attended school from time to time, worked in the farm fields, and read whenever he got the chance. That same year Thomas moved the family to Illinois where they settled near Decatur. It was here where Abraham Lincoln political career started.

  2. What is the short term significance of the Emancipation Proclamation?

    Therefore in the short term significance of the emancipation proclamation the experiences of the black soldiers can be described as a set back as the short glance of freedom was not enough to assure them respect in society including the military.

  1. Personal Motives during the Civil War

    He is a very powerful general, often correctly making decisions which are priceless to the Confederate army. However, he never feels the pride and joy in the military as he would have if he were present with his family. He comments, "He had missed a father's great joy of watching his children grow and learn" (p.

  2. To what extent do you agree with Abraham Lincoln that slavery was 'somehow the ...

    In fact, Lincoln privately thought that slavery would last one hundred more years and he didn't plan to abolish it immediately. Lincoln would also not have been able to abolish slavery immediately because the Republicans did not have the majority of Congress in 1860.

  1. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    series of reforms, their very raison d' etre, which perhaps explains why the electoral verdict of 1874 threw up such a dramatically different result. Part III: General discussion: Perhaps Gladstone's policy in Ireland was to contribute to the defeat of the Liberals in 1874 like no other.

  2. Research on the major Civil rights events between 1963 to 1968

    His speech, which a number of SNCC activists had helped write, took the Administration to task for how little it had done to protect southern blacks and civil rights workers under attack in the Deep South. Phrases such as: In good conscience, we cannot support wholeheartedly the administration's civil rights bill, for it is too little and too late.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work