• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lloyd George bears the main responsibility for the flawed Treaty of Versailles. To what extent would you agree with this comment?

Extracts from this document...


Heer Shah: 13SJ Lloyd George bears the main responsibility for the flawed Treaty of Versailles. To what extent would you agree with this comment? In January 1919 delegates from 32 countries met in Paris to make peace after the First World War - the peace they hoped would 'end all wars'. The conference was dominated by David Lloyd George, Georges Clemenceau and Woodrow Wilson, the leaders of Britain, France and America, often known as the 'Big Three'. The terms were agreed in secret diplomacy by Big three- The USA, France and Great Britain. The terms of the treaty were unrealistic. The treaty has been criticised by the many historians such as A.J.P Taylor has claimed that Allies failure to solve the German Problem in 1919 laid the foundation of Second World War. Moreover the economist John Maynard Keynes prophesied that reparations would ruin the economy of Europe However, not all historians have been so critical for instance, Kennedy and Adamthwaite. They claimed that the overriding problem was not so much the terms of Versailles, but rather German hostility to the treaty because it represented a defeat that most Germans were not willing to acknowledge. Looking at the different historical views, however, I think Lloyd George did what any other leader would do in this situation where ...read more.


Lloyd-George realised that if Germany was harshly punished this would cause great resentment amongst the Germans and could cause tensions in the future. He also believed that a strong Germany would be a good trading partner for Britain, and that a healthy German economy would prevent the rise of extremist parties either Communists or Fascists. On the other hand Lloyd-George had to listen to British public opinion which was calling for 'make Germany pay'. The aims of Lloyd George and Clemenceau were distinctively opposite in terms of their ideologies and what they wanted. Georges Clemenceau of France had one very simple belief - Germany should be brought to its knees so that she could never start a war again. This reflected the views of the French public but it was also what Clemenceau himself believed in. He had seen the north-east corner of France destroyed and he determined that Germany should never be allowed to do this again. In 1871, France had lost Alsace Lorraine and had been forced to massive reparations. French causalities between 1914 and 1918 were the highest sustained by the allied powers. The other great victorious power was the USA. Led by President Woodrow Wilson, the Americans had no great desire to punish the Germans. ...read more.


Many historians see him as charting a tricky and skilful course at Paris in 1919 between the opposing views of Clemenceau and Wilson. However, at the same time He is trying with great success to preserve British Interests. Moreover, Lloyd Geroge secured the best deal available at the time and reckoned on the terms being revised later. As claimed earlier, the terms that has been set Lloyd could have been more harshly by any other prime minister that time under circumstances where the Britain has not even recovered by the losses of First World War for instance, the financial crisis. The economic and financial crisis meant that there was growing disparity Britain's global commitments. In 1919, 30 percent of Britain's government expenditure had been on defence. At this time it was best to put the terms and improve the interests of Britain. The aims of Lloyd Geroge were seen as less inconsiderate than the aims of Clemenceau. France had lost some 1.5 million military personnel and an estimated 400,000 civilians to the war and much of the western front had been fought on French soil. To appease the French public, Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau wanted to impose policies deliberately meant to cripple Germany militarily, politically, and economically so that it will never be able to invade France again. Historian Adamthwaite sees Versailles as 'a brave attempt to deal with intractable, perhaps insoluble problems'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Extended Essay: Bismarck and The Unification of Germany

    5 star(s)

    William Carr described the Zollverien as "the mighty lever of unification". While Prussia was enjoying all this success, Austria was weakening, she had been excluded from the Zollverien all together and failed when she attempted to set up her own customs union.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    reason the Grand Alliance didn't declare war officially until 1702, this was also due to William III's death in 1702. The war lasted over a decade with the majority of the fighting taking place in Europe, in Spain, Italy and the low lands.

  1. To what extent did WW1 cause the collapse of Tsarism?

    This led to increasing rates of desertion - up to one million by 1916. An army who had not been equipped with essentials being led by a leader who was not a strong military commander unquestionably demonstrated a failure in the Tsarist regime and its likelihood of surviving.

  2. Could The Division Of Germany Been Avoided In 1949?

    The West Berlin was vulnerable as it depended on rail and road links, which ran through the Soviet Zone for supplies. The Soviets argued it was a defensive measure, however, in my opinion, to use force to get their way, doesn't show the Soviets in a good light.

  1. The First English Civil War

    The condition of this threefold advance was of course that the enemy should not be able to defeat the armies in detail, i.e., that he should be fixed and held in the Thames valley; this secured, there was no purely military objection against operating in separate armies from the circumference towards the centre.

  2. How far would agree that the strength of the British government was the main ...

    In early 1831, O'Connell was arrested and a long list of charges were brought against him, although to be later dropped. The Government obviously meant business. However, the Government's Irish policy during 1830-32 did not solely consist of a tough line on law and order; there were carrots as well as kicks.

  1. To what extent had the Russian economy been successfully modernised by 1914?

    The result of this was that the peasants were bound to the land, as they needed to pay redemption payments to commune. Ultimately, whilst from 1877 to 1905 there was a growth in peasant owned land from 6 million hectares to 21.6 million hectares, it can be seen that the peasants remained an exploited underclass on who the economy relied.

  2. The Pendle Witches - A Story of Witchcraft and Revenge

    On August 20th, the ten were hanged at Lancaster gaol. There is no record of what happened to their bodies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work