• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lloyd George bears the main responsibility for the flawed Treaty of Versailles. To what extent would you agree with this comment?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Heer Shah: 13SJ Lloyd George bears the main responsibility for the flawed Treaty of Versailles. To what extent would you agree with this comment? In January 1919 delegates from 32 countries met in Paris to make peace after the First World War - the peace they hoped would 'end all wars'. The conference was dominated by David Lloyd George, Georges Clemenceau and Woodrow Wilson, the leaders of Britain, France and America, often known as the 'Big Three'. The terms were agreed in secret diplomacy by Big three- The USA, France and Great Britain. The terms of the treaty were unrealistic. The treaty has been criticised by the many historians such as A.J.P Taylor has claimed that Allies failure to solve the German Problem in 1919 laid the foundation of Second World War. Moreover the economist John Maynard Keynes prophesied that reparations would ruin the economy of Europe However, not all historians have been so critical for instance, Kennedy and Adamthwaite. They claimed that the overriding problem was not so much the terms of Versailles, but rather German hostility to the treaty because it represented a defeat that most Germans were not willing to acknowledge. Looking at the different historical views, however, I think Lloyd George did what any other leader would do in this situation where ...read more.

Middle

Lloyd-George realised that if Germany was harshly punished this would cause great resentment amongst the Germans and could cause tensions in the future. He also believed that a strong Germany would be a good trading partner for Britain, and that a healthy German economy would prevent the rise of extremist parties either Communists or Fascists. On the other hand Lloyd-George had to listen to British public opinion which was calling for 'make Germany pay'. The aims of Lloyd George and Clemenceau were distinctively opposite in terms of their ideologies and what they wanted. Georges Clemenceau of France had one very simple belief - Germany should be brought to its knees so that she could never start a war again. This reflected the views of the French public but it was also what Clemenceau himself believed in. He had seen the north-east corner of France destroyed and he determined that Germany should never be allowed to do this again. In 1871, France had lost Alsace Lorraine and had been forced to massive reparations. French causalities between 1914 and 1918 were the highest sustained by the allied powers. The other great victorious power was the USA. Led by President Woodrow Wilson, the Americans had no great desire to punish the Germans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many historians see him as charting a tricky and skilful course at Paris in 1919 between the opposing views of Clemenceau and Wilson. However, at the same time He is trying with great success to preserve British Interests. Moreover, Lloyd Geroge secured the best deal available at the time and reckoned on the terms being revised later. As claimed earlier, the terms that has been set Lloyd could have been more harshly by any other prime minister that time under circumstances where the Britain has not even recovered by the losses of First World War for instance, the financial crisis. The economic and financial crisis meant that there was growing disparity Britain's global commitments. In 1919, 30 percent of Britain's government expenditure had been on defence. At this time it was best to put the terms and improve the interests of Britain. The aims of Lloyd Geroge were seen as less inconsiderate than the aims of Clemenceau. France had lost some 1.5 million military personnel and an estimated 400,000 civilians to the war and much of the western front had been fought on French soil. To appease the French public, Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau wanted to impose policies deliberately meant to cripple Germany militarily, politically, and economically so that it will never be able to invade France again. Historian Adamthwaite sees Versailles as 'a brave attempt to deal with intractable, perhaps insoluble problems'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Extended Essay: Bismarck and The Unification of Germany

    5 star(s)

    Prussia, therefore became the economic leader of the states. The tremendous impact of economic unity can not be ignored whilst giving an accurate picture of factors influencing German nationalism and in this was, it is unfair to give Bismarck all the credit for uniting the states.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    The conflict was finally settled with the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 and the Treaty of Rastadt in 1714, resulting in Phillip V of Spain being recognised as the King of Spain, but he must renounce his place in the French line of succession, making the unification of France and Spain impossible.

  1. To what extent did WW1 cause the collapse of Tsarism?

    As she was unsure how to handle the war and the government, she continued to assign ministers who were hopeless and did little to supervise or encourage what should be done. Therefore Nicholas and Alexandra each failed at their appointed duties and was definitely blamed to an extent for the Russian defeat to Germany.

  2. Cities were the main driving force of the Reformation in Germany(TM) " explain whether ...

    In consequence of the broad appeal of the message it attracted the Princes who became in favour of the Reformation. Originally, the Princes did not want to commit to Lutheranism as they saw it as a radical movement and did not want to be associated with it if it were to fail.

  1. To What Extent Was The South African War (1899 - 1902) A Capitalist War

    of capitalist imperialism elsewhere.6 So it can be seen that such was the strength of feeling against the capitalism of the Boer war that two men who did not entirely agree on policy could agree on the motivation. The South African War was a defining conflict for many people; it

  2. The First English Civil War

    The Lord Brooke, who commanded for Parliament in Warwickshire and Staffordshire and was looked on by many as Essex's eventual successor, was killed in besieging Lichfield Cathedral on 2 March, and, though the cathedral soon capitulated, Gell and Brereton were severely handled in the indecisive Battle of Hopton Heath near

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    Among the dead was Walter Golyakov. Sultan Kilic Arslan, hoped to defeat the new enemy forces in the same easy way, and therefore did not take seriously the approaching enemy. But he was cruelly disappointed. His easy armed, with bows and arrows, cavalry was easily defeated by Western cavalry in open battle.

  2. Russian History. A period of great achievement To what extent do you agree with ...

    In Sophia?s age, the female relatives of the Tsar were kept away from the courtroom and other political workrooms, and funerals were traditionally carried on without the women. In her way, Sophia stormed the funeral, insisting on her presence and simultaneously setting off a chain of events that would result in her regency.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work