• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Missouri Compromise 1820.

Extracts from this document...


Missouri Compromise 1820 Northerners finally were receiving the outcome that they had wished for with slavery slowly declining at the end of the 18th century. Southern economilcal dependancy on slavery was slowly withering away due to the Act of 1808, stating that by that time slavery would not be allowed. Due to this Southerners were forced to change their means of production and the use of slaves. When the 19th century arrived it brought the invention of the Cotton Gin. This invention, created by Eli Whitney, assisted in speeding the picking of cotton by removing the seed. The only flaw in this was that it relied on even more unskilled labor. Slaves were found perfect for the handlying of this machine: it was easy to manufactor and as easy to work.. From this, Southerners found it now more than ever nessesary to hault the abolition of slavery do to the economic prosperity that lied ahead because of the Cotton Gin. In Southern eyes, slavery was a better choice than free labor. IN the case of using free labor Southerners couldn't be totally dependent on the person because they might demand things such as higher wages. If free laborors were refused what they asked, Southerners faced the risk of them stop working. ...read more.


In actuality most southerners were not as Weld describe because they realized that the better you treated a slave and healthier it was the more work that it could accomplish for you. Not only this, but due to the harsh rigid tone of his words, Weld, gives whoever is reading this no option towards working out some sort of compromise between North and South but instead just relies on getting things done. Abolitionist works, such as The Liberato,r aided in aggravating the South. William Loyd Garrison's The Liberator, was printed as a Boston proabolitionist newspaper in which Garrison referrs to Southerners to being sinners and that slaves should do anything to get out of the miserable situation that they are in, even if that means blacks revolting against their. He as well brings up the issue of blacks being equals with whites. : Assenting to the "self-evident truth, and endowed by their Creator with certain enalienable rights-among which are life, liberty, and persuit of happiness." Garrison, here, clearly explicates how by having slaves not be free we are going against everything that the declaration stands for and represents. Some say that Garrison's The Liberator might have even sparked the rebellion led by Nat Turner in which Turner gathers up a group of slaves and killed over fifty white southerners. ...read more.


In William Harper's Source Problems in the United States History Harper says "...The cultivation of the grat crops cannot be carried on in any portion of our own country where there are no slaves...And what would be the eefect of putting an end to the cultivation...annihilating,at a blow,two thrids or three fourths of our foreign commerce?..." From this we can see that slavery was no easy matter and that it too more economic thinking to get rid of Slaves. Perhaps more than the North thought. Though both the South and the North make legitimate reason for their not wanting or wanting the emancipation of slaves, it seems that due to the North the process or reaching compromise was delayed unneccesarily. Instead of thinking about the economical blow emancipation would cause the North ruthlessly kept attacking the South's morality. The South realized that without slaves for a bit longer they wouldn't be able to make a full economic recovery once emancipation was inacted. But because of the attacks and harsh literature being published by abolitionists, the South spent more time in trying to protect themselves from slaves getting ideas from these works than trying to figure out a plan to resolve the issue with the North. It seems as if the issue could have been quickend if the North hadnt made such quick and damaging attacks. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. The abolition of slavery 1833.

    cruelty of the slave trade from all over Britain and William Wilberforce, who fought for legislation at Parliament. A white middle class man by the name of Granville sharp was just one of the people to turn the publics opinion against slavery.

  2. Free essay

    The Missouri Compromise. Since the bulk of the settlers in the territory of Missouri ...

    The result of this compromise was going to be a division between the North and the South. Furthermore, the Missouri Compromise was not adequately sufficient enough to keep the North and the South pleased. As the Missouri Compromise was written it was made permissible for Missouri to turn into a

  1. Roosevelt(TM)s aims of relief, recovery and reform 1933-1945

    The cost of all the doings of the AAA meant that there were higher taxes on food, the AAA did little or nothing to improve the lives of millions of farm workers and farmers with more land received more compensation; it wasn't based of farmers needs.

  2. US History. How would you characterize the positions of the North at the time ...

    The position of the North at the time leading up to the Compromise of 1850 could be divided into several categories. These include unionists, abolitionists, and free-soilers. Some Northerners didn't want the South to secede and wanted to maintain the United States as a whole; they were considered Unionists.

  1. Reasons for the Missouri Compromise

    Ultimately, the Missouri compromise was only possible because most Northerners were not actually very concerned about the actual conditions of the slaves or any moral issues, and it was only extremely anti-slavery groups in the Northeast that led moral attacks to try and restrict slavery in Missouri.

  2. A different view - Slavery.

    Captain Delano, in his naivety, cannot believe Babo is intelligent enough to have taken over the ship, and to have Don Benito in his power. He is so fully alive to the stereotypical image slaves that it would not come up in his mind to think they would be able to revolt.

  1. What was the 1850 Compromise and Why did it Fail?

    However the argument of whether slavery should be allowed to expand, still continued and even threatened to tear the union apart, therefore a compromise of some sort seemed essential. To resolve the sectional strife throughout America, Henry Clay offered a set of resolutions, which collectively was known as the 'omnibus'

  2. Civil Rights Revision Cards 1945-68

    SNCC & CORE Beliefs 1. Members of SNCC were impatient at slow progress towards equality. Angered by lack of federal protection in Mississippi (1964 Freedom Summer). Turned to more militant leader = SC = Stokely Carmichael. CORE also turned to a more militant leader = FM = Floyd McKissick (replaced James Farmer).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work