• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalins objectives by 1941?

Extracts from this document...


How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalin's objectives by 1941? Stalin's aim was to modernise Russia by means of the five-year plans which saw an emphasis on enforced and rapid industrialisation in order to catch up with the advances western economies. Source A shows Stalin's motives for industrialisation similar to that in source B, industrialisation is for the benefit of the workers and to fight against class enemies. However, Source A expresses a wider awareness of the vulnerable USSR in the hostile world around it which was caused as a result of the countries backwardness in comparison to the Western economies. In addition to the previous motive, Stalin also held an ideological one. Stalin proposed the idea of "Socialism in one country", although,? ?it is interesting that? ?from Marxist theory,? ?socialism? ?(eventually communism,?) ?must prevail throughout the entire world. Stalin wanted to show the superiority of socialism/communism over western capitalism. ...read more.


These statistics suggest that Stalin did meet his objectives to some extent, although the figures can not be fully trusted because the figures were rigged by local officials and managers to give the impression they had met their targets, they do suggest there was a rapid increase in Soviet industrial capacity which was crucial to establishing a firm industrial base and also a military one. Stalin's economic reforms succeeded only in the traditional areas of heavy industry. In those sectors where unskilled and forced labour could be easily used, as n the building of large projects such as factories, bridges, refineries, and canals, the results were impressive. However, the Soviet economy itself remained unbalanced. Stalin gave little thought to developing an overall economic strategy. Nor were modern industrial methods adopted. Old, wasteful techniques, such as using massed labour rather than efficient machines, continued to be used. Vital financial and material resources were squandered. ...read more.


Yet whatever the hardship of the workers, the fact was that in 1941 the USSR was economically strong enough to engage in an ultimately successful military struggle of unprecedented duration and intensity. In Soviet propaganda, this was what mattered, not minor questions of living standards. The USSR's triumph over Nazism would later be claimed as the ultimate proof the wisdom of Stalin's enforced industrialisation programme. The historian Gattrell who built upon the argument of E.H. Carr acknowledged that Stalin was certainly severe and destructive in his treatment of people, but pointed out that the outcome of industrialisation was an economy strong enough to sustain the USSR through four years of the most demanding of modern wars. Hard though it may be for the Western liberal minds to accept, it may be that Russia could not have been modernised b any other methods except those used by Stalin. Therefore by implementing the policy of industrialisation the USSR was able to modernise and catch up to some extent with the more advanced Western economies, even if the methods were not the best planned or manoeuvred methods. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    After evaluating each argument about whether Stalin had a right to be suspicious of his western allies over the delaying of the Second Front, it would seem Wolfson is most credible here because Lightbody does not consider the other commitments of the west to show why there was a delay.

  2. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    The main area focused on was armaments and defence with the increasing out look of the USSR being invaded. The other problems with the third five year plan were the shortage of qualified and experienced workers for the Gosplan because many had been killed due to the Purges.

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    In 1933 approximately 5 million peasants had been sent to 'Gulags' or exiled to Siberia, usually for petty offences with little relevance to characteristics of a Kulak. Fitzpatrick believes although Stalin may have had a stern theoretical idea as to what a Kulak was, when the process began, local party members had little idea what characteristics a Kulak possessed.

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    Consumer industry also developed, though did not necessarily improve. Throughout the Five-Year Plans, there was some growth in consumer goods, for example footwear production increased as did food production. Greater focus was placed on consumer industry in the second and third Five-Year Plans and improvements made in the late 1930s began to have an impact on living conditions, with new bakeries, ice-cream production and meat-packing factories established.

  1. How far did Colbert achieve his economic objectives?

    Similarly historian Tim Blanning describes how Louis 'appeared in a coat encrusted with 14,000,000 livres-worth of diamonds3'. This huge figure is very significant evidence of Colbert's success, as Louis was able to spend a substantial proportion of France's annual expenditure on a coat purely to demonstrate his absolutism.

  2. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    Conversely, removing the objective view of what Stalin achieved through his methods, the results of his work seem appalling. Stalin's method of bringing Russia up to speed with other dominant countries of the world led to the most deaths and the highest amount of famine than in any other ruler's time.

  1. How successful was Stalins economic policy?

    called capital investment, and although Russia had various goods to export, they were not enough to cover the sums of money needed. Also, the USSR was not in a position to borrow money from abroad, so ultimately the only source which could generate this wealth was agriculture.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Zinoviev?s strengths in the power struggle: 1. Regarded as intelligent, energetic and very knowledgeable. 2. One of the party?s best speakers. 3. An ?Old Bolshevik? ? meant he was likely to get respect from colleagues. 4. Promoted to the highest ranks of the party by Lenin. 5.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work