• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalins objectives by 1941?

Extracts from this document...


How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalin's objectives by 1941? Stalin's aim was to modernise Russia by means of the five-year plans which saw an emphasis on enforced and rapid industrialisation in order to catch up with the advances western economies. Source A shows Stalin's motives for industrialisation similar to that in source B, industrialisation is for the benefit of the workers and to fight against class enemies. However, Source A expresses a wider awareness of the vulnerable USSR in the hostile world around it which was caused as a result of the countries backwardness in comparison to the Western economies. In addition to the previous motive, Stalin also held an ideological one. Stalin proposed the idea of "Socialism in one country", although,? ?it is interesting that? ?from Marxist theory,? ?socialism? ?(eventually communism,?) ?must prevail throughout the entire world. Stalin wanted to show the superiority of socialism/communism over western capitalism. ...read more.


These statistics suggest that Stalin did meet his objectives to some extent, although the figures can not be fully trusted because the figures were rigged by local officials and managers to give the impression they had met their targets, they do suggest there was a rapid increase in Soviet industrial capacity which was crucial to establishing a firm industrial base and also a military one. Stalin's economic reforms succeeded only in the traditional areas of heavy industry. In those sectors where unskilled and forced labour could be easily used, as n the building of large projects such as factories, bridges, refineries, and canals, the results were impressive. However, the Soviet economy itself remained unbalanced. Stalin gave little thought to developing an overall economic strategy. Nor were modern industrial methods adopted. Old, wasteful techniques, such as using massed labour rather than efficient machines, continued to be used. Vital financial and material resources were squandered. ...read more.


Yet whatever the hardship of the workers, the fact was that in 1941 the USSR was economically strong enough to engage in an ultimately successful military struggle of unprecedented duration and intensity. In Soviet propaganda, this was what mattered, not minor questions of living standards. The USSR's triumph over Nazism would later be claimed as the ultimate proof the wisdom of Stalin's enforced industrialisation programme. The historian Gattrell who built upon the argument of E.H. Carr acknowledged that Stalin was certainly severe and destructive in his treatment of people, but pointed out that the outcome of industrialisation was an economy strong enough to sustain the USSR through four years of the most demanding of modern wars. Hard though it may be for the Western liberal minds to accept, it may be that Russia could not have been modernised b any other methods except those used by Stalin. Therefore by implementing the policy of industrialisation the USSR was able to modernise and catch up to some extent with the more advanced Western economies, even if the methods were not the best planned or manoeuvred methods. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    In his writing, Wolfson says that, "some 10,000 planes, 80 warships and 4,000 other craft were needed for the invasion, all of which had to be prepared and assembled in the right places."2 Wolfson also mentions the fighting that is taking place in North Africa at the time of which Stalin is calling for a Second Front.

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    When looked at from a purely economic point of view, it could be claimed that Stalin's policies were generally successful as they helped to achieve Stalin's aim of industrialisation. However, industrialisation was not the only result of the plan and other areas were not as successful.

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    The third five year plan started in 1938 when the Soviet Union was experiencing a 'slowdown' in the economy where heavy industries almost stopped growing. It ended after only three and half years because of the German attack on the USSR.

  2. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    The biggest question any historian is faced with is; did the ends justify the means in Stalin's case? Looking separately at both overall achievement and price of progress, the position of Stalin in the context of wider Russian history seems to support the statement made about success at the cost of misery for the population.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The Tsar had absolute power. He could choose the ministers in the Duma, make and break laws as and when he pleased and could appoint whom he wanted as army leaders. In 1906 a Constitutional Monarchy was formed with the Duma moving towards Democracy.

  2. I believe Stalin's methods at the time were the only ones appropriate to the ...

    Because of these methods and developments and despite the suffering inflicted, the Soviet Union was able to inflict defeat on Nazi Germany and come through a change of Tsarist rule to a communist society. I doubt that had any other leader been in charge would USSR had done so, and had become a superpower.

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    Despite this there is clear evidence that one of the big influences on Stalin's choice to collectivise was the way in which it would allow a more efficient requisitioning process, consequently injecting more food into the urban areas of Russia, which would help the USSR towards the ideological aim of creating a Communist workers utopia.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Kamenev?s strengths in the power struggle: 1. An ?Old Bolshevik?. 2. Helped form party policy and was close to Lenin who entrusted him with many of his personal papers in 1922. 3. Had influence in Moscow where he ran the local party. 4. Thoughtful and intelligent. Kamenev?s weaknesses in the power struggle: 1. Less popular than Zinoviev.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work