• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalins objectives by 1941?

Extracts from this document...


How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalin's objectives by 1941? Stalin's aim was to modernise Russia by means of the five-year plans which saw an emphasis on enforced and rapid industrialisation in order to catch up with the advances western economies. Source A shows Stalin's motives for industrialisation similar to that in source B, industrialisation is for the benefit of the workers and to fight against class enemies. However, Source A expresses a wider awareness of the vulnerable USSR in the hostile world around it which was caused as a result of the countries backwardness in comparison to the Western economies. In addition to the previous motive, Stalin also held an ideological one. Stalin proposed the idea of "Socialism in one country", although,? ?it is interesting that? ?from Marxist theory,? ?socialism? ?(eventually communism,?) ?must prevail throughout the entire world. Stalin wanted to show the superiority of socialism/communism over western capitalism. ...read more.


These statistics suggest that Stalin did meet his objectives to some extent, although the figures can not be fully trusted because the figures were rigged by local officials and managers to give the impression they had met their targets, they do suggest there was a rapid increase in Soviet industrial capacity which was crucial to establishing a firm industrial base and also a military one. Stalin's economic reforms succeeded only in the traditional areas of heavy industry. In those sectors where unskilled and forced labour could be easily used, as n the building of large projects such as factories, bridges, refineries, and canals, the results were impressive. However, the Soviet economy itself remained unbalanced. Stalin gave little thought to developing an overall economic strategy. Nor were modern industrial methods adopted. Old, wasteful techniques, such as using massed labour rather than efficient machines, continued to be used. Vital financial and material resources were squandered. ...read more.


Yet whatever the hardship of the workers, the fact was that in 1941 the USSR was economically strong enough to engage in an ultimately successful military struggle of unprecedented duration and intensity. In Soviet propaganda, this was what mattered, not minor questions of living standards. The USSR's triumph over Nazism would later be claimed as the ultimate proof the wisdom of Stalin's enforced industrialisation programme. The historian Gattrell who built upon the argument of E.H. Carr acknowledged that Stalin was certainly severe and destructive in his treatment of people, but pointed out that the outcome of industrialisation was an economy strong enough to sustain the USSR through four years of the most demanding of modern wars. Hard though it may be for the Western liberal minds to accept, it may be that Russia could not have been modernised b any other methods except those used by Stalin. Therefore by implementing the policy of industrialisation the USSR was able to modernise and catch up to some extent with the more advanced Western economies, even if the methods were not the best planned or manoeuvred methods. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    After evaluating each argument about whether Stalin had a right to be suspicious of his western allies over the delaying of the Second Front, it would seem Wolfson is most credible here because Lightbody does not consider the other commitments of the west to show why there was a delay.

  2. Joseph Stalin's Economic Plans. Stalin ended Lenin's NEP and set about achieving modernisation ...

    which ordinary people wanted to buy. In the towns and cities, most housing was provided by the state , but overcrowding was a problem. Most families lived in flats and were crowded into two rooms which were used for living, sleeping and eating.

  1. How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalin's objectives by 1941

    Much of the west was capitalist and as communism was a total opposite then there was a sense of hostility, this therefore raised fears with Stalin as he was convinced that there was going to be conflict. Many western countries also supported the Mensheviks during the Russian civil war and

  2. How far did Colbert achieve his economic objectives?

    Similarly historian Tim Blanning describes how Louis 'appeared in a coat encrusted with 14,000,000 livres-worth of diamonds3'. This huge figure is very significant evidence of Colbert's success, as Louis was able to spend a substantial proportion of France's annual expenditure on a coat purely to demonstrate his absolutism.

  1. How successful was Stalins economic policy?

    Surplus grain could be sold for export, and other grain supplies were needed to feed the growing workforce, these 2 needs had to be satisfied for the push toward industrialization to be successful. Before December 1927, the main body that organised and administrated the economy was the NEP, but in

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    made new industrial centres of less developed parts of the country, for example Kazakhstan and Georgia. These industrial centres, started under the first Five-Year Plan, greatly helped the success of the second plan, as by that time, the centres were completed and in production.

  1. How far do you agree that Stalin paid more attention to the practical rather ...

    Joining the League of Nations in September 1934 also shows this. Stalin's then commissar for foreign affairs Maksim Litvinov was trying to create Collective security arrangements, as the Red Army were in no position to fight or protect Russia, but this then again shows Russia being more practical in terms of foreign policy.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Kamenev?s strengths in the power struggle: 1. An ?Old Bolshevik?. 2. Helped form party policy and was close to Lenin who entrusted him with many of his personal papers in 1922. 3. Had influence in Moscow where he ran the local party. 4. Thoughtful and intelligent. Kamenev?s weaknesses in the power struggle: 1. Less popular than Zinoviev.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work