• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

More often than not, superpowers, rather than causing regional conflicts, were reluctantly drawn into them." How far does your study of the Cold War in the period 1950-80 supports this view?

Extracts from this document...


1. "More often than not, superpowers, rather than causing regional conflicts, were reluctantly drawn into them." How far does your study of the Cold War in the period 1950-80 supports this view? The period of 1950 to 1980 saw the Cold War spread from the traditional playing field of Europe to other parts of the world. However it is quite clear that the USA and the Soviet Union played only a marginal role in originating these conflicts-at the most setting up the basic framework for it to occur. Furthermore, when they did get involved they each did so to varying degrees. The USA seemed to be much more motivated and interested in involving themselves, while the Soviet Union was more apprehensive. Therefore, to say that both superpowers "were reluctantly drawn into them (the conflicts)" is not completely true. To illustrate my point I will analyse the Korean and Vietnam wars. There is strong evidence to suggest that US entered the Korean War fairly voluntarily. Firstly, the US was motivated by strong security interests. They misperceived the North's invasion to be Soviet instigated and an attempt to spread communist ideology into Asia. ...read more.


Thus Truman felt he had to prove them wrong by taking a harder approach against communism. Also, the US felt that the loss of Vietnam would put a strain of the security of not only Japan but the whole Eastern Pacific which included countries such as Australia and India. Very much in tangent with this, is concerns over the domino theory (invented during this time), where the US believed that if Vietnam fell so would the countries around it, and then the countries around those countries and so on. Thus, they felt they had to stop this communist expansion before it got out of hand. John W. Mason tell us in his book, "The Cold War 1945-1991", that: The Eisenhower administration saw Ho Chi Minh as an instrument of international communism and claimed that the loss of Indochina would have a disastrous effect on the rest of South-east Asia. The domino theory-later to be ridiculed by critics of the Vietnam War-was born."3 Furthermore, US were not only motivated by strategic concerns but also political and economic ones as well. Firstly, US wished to help France, so as to build upon already present friendship and obtain French support in NATO. ...read more.


Perhaps the most important point which shows how reluctant the Soviet Union was in getting involved in the war was the fact that pressed for a quick and peaceful end to it. They got involved due to obligation, maintained as limited role as possible and wanted to get out at the first opportunity. It can thus be seen that the degree of involvement varied depending on the superpower. While neither superpower played a significant role in originating either conflicts, the US got more involved in them as compared to the Soviets. This was mainly due to the fact that the US had a greater interest in these conflicts than the Soviets, and thus were more strongly motivated to intervene. Thus, it can be said that US were fairly voluntary in their involvement in these regional conflicts, as they sought to further their own interests. US actions and policies during these conflicts also seemed to suggest voluntary involvement as they seldom showed signs of disengagement but rather tended towards escalation. The Soviets however, very much unmotivated to get involved, were cautious with regards to their involvement in the wars, playing as limited a role as possible. Thus one cannot say that the statement, is completely true, though it may be to a fairly large extent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Sino-Soviet Split

    a new Treaty of Friendship and Alliance be drafted to replace the old one signed by the Soviet Union and the GMD. When the Chinese leader traveled to Moscow to discuss this issue, Stalin did not even turn up at the station to meet him, a disrespectful gesture which deeply wounded Mao's dignity.

  2. Korean propaganda during the Second World War and the Korean War had a different ...

    needed leadership, led to a passionate civil war. Civilians from the North would cause -8- oblivious rampages in attempt to pocket grains of rice from the crops of the south. Violent disruptions and persecution by the North were also illustrated. Pure hatred for each other made crossing over borders, sometimes fatal and perilous.

  1. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    Nagy introduced moderate reforms that were part of his ?New Course?, and under popular pressure also moved to withdraw Hungary from the Warsaw Pact. This proved to be the final straw for the Soviets. Over a hundred thousand Soviet soldiers marched into Hungary to stop the demonstrators, and restore peace.

  2. In the years 195360, President Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather ...

    The leaked Gaither Report in 1957 which indicated a ?bomber? and ?missile? gap in favour of the USSR and public cries to ?step-up? the nuclear arms race add an important dimension to the actions of Eisenhower during the arms race.

  1. In the years 1953-60, President Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather ...

    Even if so it evidently confronts communism, and I would say even in a harsher manner when it used to be under Truman. Just weeks after Eisenhower became president, Stalin?s death brought what appeared to be a significant changes in Soviet international policy.

  2. (Sources) - How far do you agree with the view that Reagans actions ...

    science fiction so it can be argued that the SDI programme wasn?t significant in pressurising the Soviet Union but rather unnecessarily expended enormous amounts of dollars which could?ve been put to better use. Regardless of the limited successes of the SDI programme, Reagan?s approach was strengthened by the support he

  1. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    had stopped defining the structure of international politics. One of the world?s superpowers had declined leaving the global stage to the remaining super power the United States. The American President then in power George H.W.Bush had given an introduction to the world of a new order in his statement when

  2. In the years 1953-1960 was president Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy based on confrontation rather ...

    The failure of the rollback policy, despite its advocacy by Gen. Douglas MacArthur, moved the United States to a commitment to the containment policy, without rollback. Radio Free Europe, a private agency funded by Congress, broadcast attacks on Communism directed to Eastern Europe.[13] A strategic alternative to rollback was containment,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work