• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

More often than not, superpowers, rather than causing regional conflicts, were reluctantly drawn into them." How far does your study of the Cold War in the period 1950-80 supports this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. "More often than not, superpowers, rather than causing regional conflicts, were reluctantly drawn into them." How far does your study of the Cold War in the period 1950-80 supports this view? The period of 1950 to 1980 saw the Cold War spread from the traditional playing field of Europe to other parts of the world. However it is quite clear that the USA and the Soviet Union played only a marginal role in originating these conflicts-at the most setting up the basic framework for it to occur. Furthermore, when they did get involved they each did so to varying degrees. The USA seemed to be much more motivated and interested in involving themselves, while the Soviet Union was more apprehensive. Therefore, to say that both superpowers "were reluctantly drawn into them (the conflicts)" is not completely true. To illustrate my point I will analyse the Korean and Vietnam wars. There is strong evidence to suggest that US entered the Korean War fairly voluntarily. Firstly, the US was motivated by strong security interests. They misperceived the North's invasion to be Soviet instigated and an attempt to spread communist ideology into Asia. ...read more.

Middle

Thus Truman felt he had to prove them wrong by taking a harder approach against communism. Also, the US felt that the loss of Vietnam would put a strain of the security of not only Japan but the whole Eastern Pacific which included countries such as Australia and India. Very much in tangent with this, is concerns over the domino theory (invented during this time), where the US believed that if Vietnam fell so would the countries around it, and then the countries around those countries and so on. Thus, they felt they had to stop this communist expansion before it got out of hand. John W. Mason tell us in his book, "The Cold War 1945-1991", that: The Eisenhower administration saw Ho Chi Minh as an instrument of international communism and claimed that the loss of Indochina would have a disastrous effect on the rest of South-east Asia. The domino theory-later to be ridiculed by critics of the Vietnam War-was born."3 Furthermore, US were not only motivated by strategic concerns but also political and economic ones as well. Firstly, US wished to help France, so as to build upon already present friendship and obtain French support in NATO. ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps the most important point which shows how reluctant the Soviet Union was in getting involved in the war was the fact that pressed for a quick and peaceful end to it. They got involved due to obligation, maintained as limited role as possible and wanted to get out at the first opportunity. It can thus be seen that the degree of involvement varied depending on the superpower. While neither superpower played a significant role in originating either conflicts, the US got more involved in them as compared to the Soviets. This was mainly due to the fact that the US had a greater interest in these conflicts than the Soviets, and thus were more strongly motivated to intervene. Thus, it can be said that US were fairly voluntary in their involvement in these regional conflicts, as they sought to further their own interests. US actions and policies during these conflicts also seemed to suggest voluntary involvement as they seldom showed signs of disengagement but rather tended towards escalation. The Soviets however, very much unmotivated to get involved, were cautious with regards to their involvement in the wars, playing as limited a role as possible. Thus one cannot say that the statement, is completely true, though it may be to a fairly large extent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did North Korea invade South Korea in June 1950, and why did USA ...

    Even so, containment was designed to be followed anywhere in the world. The events in China in 1949 also meant that USA had to stay involved with Korea. On 30th June 1949, Mao, the Chinese Premier, said that China would lean to one side and establish a special relationship with Russia.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Was the Cold War inevitable? If not, how could it have been avoided? What role did personalities play? Were there points at which different courses of action might have been followed? What economic factors were central? What ideological causes? Which historical forces? At what juncture did alternative possibilities become invalid?

  1. The Thirty Years War was a war over religion rather than politics. Do you ...

    Such hints of autocratic intentions even aroused suspicion among the Catholic princes who shared the Emperor's religious objectives. Thus there was an element of truth in the Franco-Swedish propaganda of the 1630's that the Thirty Years' War was not just a religious war but a war for 'the liberties of Germany'7.

  2. Korean propaganda during the Second World War and the Korean War had a different ...

    needed leadership, led to a passionate civil war. Civilians from the North would cause -8- oblivious rampages in attempt to pocket grains of rice from the crops of the south. Violent disruptions and persecution by the North were also illustrated. Pure hatred for each other made crossing over borders, sometimes fatal and perilous.

  1. Discuss Trotsky's View that War was the Locomotive of History (1855-1914)

    Minister of the Interior, Plehve, was assassinated by the Social Revolutionary terrorists. As war continued, discontent multiplied. The entire war was counter-productive in its motive to inspire Russian patriotism and divert revolution; the actual result of defeat seemed to promote the exact opposite of what it was trying to achieve,

  2. North Korea and South Korea after the Korean war.

    Some people are hopeful once the dictator in the North either falls or dies reunification of the states will happen with little resistance. In conclusion, North Korea and South Korea have worked towards the common goal of reunification despite obstacles and set backs.

  1. "The Cold War in Europe brought the big powers into fighting wars outside Europe ...

    * Similarly, the SU sought to protect its interests and ideology in areas where it saw the US as aggressively trying to restrict the spread of Communism, and even to roll back Communism Other factors that limit the role of the European Cold War in spurring superpower involvement in globalised conflicts 1.

  2. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    After an armistice was signed in Paris in 1947, it was agreed that Finland would pay reparations to the Soviet Union for the damages it had caused, and the Porkalla region was leased to the USSR for a period of 50 years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work