• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Mound after Mound, Myth after Myth: The Truth Behind the Mounds.

Extracts from this document...


Kathryn Mack ANT141 Swanepoel Nov. 24, 2003 Mound after Mound, Myth after Myth: The Truth Behind the Mounds Archaeology is a field for the curious and inquisitive. The pyramids sparked the interest of archaeologists in Egypt, which led to a countless number of investigations and publications about the ancient structures and the people who built them. In the early 1800s, archaeologists began surveying the Mississippi Valley and discovered the remains of the Cahokia civilization and its famous Monk's Mound. Intrigued, they continued their exploration of "one of the largest pyramid structures ever built by an ancient society" (Iseminger, 1999). For a long time, the real builders of the mounds were a mystery to 19th century archaeologists, who fabricated myths regarding the originators. The mounds of Cahokia, located on the Illinois side of the Mississippi River, are mysteries that unfolded over the years. Their close proximity to a large river provided fertile plains and bountiful food resources, which laid the foundation for the most-populated area of people in North America north of Mexico (Feder:2002, 151). ...read more.


Iron, Silver and alloyed metal artifacts were believed to be created by a culture more technologically advanced than the Native Americans were. These artifacts were alleged proof that mound culture was older than American Indian culture. The stone tablets found at the mounds had language from other lands in Europe, Asia, or Africa. Explorers thought that if the Native Americans were the mound-builders, they would have been building them when the Europeans arrived. Too barbaric to be the founders of any civilization, Native Americans rarely received credit for their work until many years after they were driven from their homes by white settlers. The Cahokia civilization discounts Feder's summary of the mound-builder myths. According to Iseminger, Cahokia was a complex Native American society with city-like characteristics that existed 400 years before Christopher Columbus arrived in America. In the 1920s, Warren K. Moorehead's work proved that the mounds were indeed built by the Native Americans (Iseminger, 1999). Native American culture was not too primitive to have reached the level of civilization of the mound-builders. ...read more.


The rituals surrounding these burials mimic the ceremonies of the Natchez Indians of 17th and 18th century Mississippi, "where individuals often volunteered to be sacrificed upon a leader's death to raise their own or their family's status" (Iseminger, 1999). This was an example of proof that Native Americans built the mounds. Many of the artifacts found in the Cahokian mounds were the results of heavy trading. Sacred figurines and clay artifacts share the same illustrations as later Native American religious beliefs (Fagan, 2004:385). The Cahokians traded for items such as arrowheads originally from Midwest states. Excavators found other artifacts made from mica and copper hammered from Lake Superior. These artifacts prove that the socially complex society of Cahokian traders made it possible for them to have been the original mound-builders. Archaeology is the product of the curious nature of human beings who want to uncover the truth about ancient cultures. The mound-builders were once a mysterious race who turned out to be the native people of Mississippi. Through excavations and various other studies, archaeologists have revealed the truth behind the distorted myths of the early 19th century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    Roosevelt had not involved Trumann in the field of foreign affairs quite deliberately. He therefore had to get himself up to speed immediately. Trumann was not as understanding of Soviet foibles as Roosevelt had shown him to be; nonetheless he was not, at this stage, anti Soviet.

  2. Russia: a Century of Upheaval.

    To cap it all off, there was a General Strike, and trade and industry grinded to a halt. The general strike left the Tsar no choice but to give in, he sent out a document called the October manifesto in which he promised Russia would have an elected parliament.

  1. The Truth About Chernobyl.

    He also points to their ignorance by how they often carelessly compared and treated nuclear stations like thermo-stations; something that anyone with an understanding of relative physics would know is beyond compare. To add to this, Medvedev points to the fact that officials were routinely put in charge of matters

  2. What are the complexities in 'complex emergencies'?

    "The recent resumption of hostilities between Eritrea and Ethiopia is adding to Sudan's already swelling population of displaced persons with 50,000 Eritreans fleeing across the border to escape the Ethiopian's mass offensive5". What has become apparent through aid operations over the last 15 years is that aid can have a very negative effect.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work