• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Mussolini's foreign policy.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mussolini's foreign policy. Foreign and military policy were the key activities of the Fascist state. Martin Clarke. Such was Mussolini's belief in the importance of foreign policy that apart form a brief period from 1922 to 1936 he acted as his own Foreign Minister and thereafter retained control his son-in-law Count Galeazzo Ciano. Mussolini's style abroad, as at home, was that of the bully rather than the negotiator and here too he firmly believed that in politics it was more advantageous to be feared rather than liked. In foreign policy he challenged other countries one after the other to create the impression of being a difficult person who had to be bought off with victories of prestige. Running about biting everybody was how the South African leader, Smuts, described him at the end of 1923. While he told foreigners that his policy was one of peace a co-operation, at the same time he told Italians that his aim was national grandeur. During its first year of rule, Fascism gave the world the opportunity to judge its ideas on world policy, not only by official declarations but by actual proof. ...read more.

Middle

He rushed to Locarno to set his seal on the treaty agreeing to the Franco-German border. He eagerly participated in the Kellogg-Briand pact outlawing war. In 1938 he revelled in the limelight as the arbiter of peace at the Munich conference. However these were chiefly an exercise in public relations as Mussolini was prepared to sign a treaty just for the effect it would have on the public and without bothering too much on the details of what it contained. Treaties were just pieces of paper with no binding force if circumstances changed. Meanwhile, the rise of Hitler and the Nazis worried Mussolini and in 1934 he made clear his opposition to a union between Germany and Austria Anschluss In January 1935 a formal treaty was signed with France. Then at Stresa in April, Italy, France and Britain jointly condemned Hitler's re-armament plans and committed themselves to close and cordial collaboration to maintain the status quo in Europe. Mussolini once declared My objective is simple I want to make Italy great, respected and feared. Believing that France and Britain would curtail Hitler's aggressiveness, Mussolini turned his attention to North Africa to Abyssinia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Accordingly, in April he seized Albania, which was an Italian protectorate. In May 1939 Italy signed the Pact of Steel with Germany, which committed Italy to military undertakings. When Germany invaded Poland and World War II was declared Italians were thunderstruck, as they had not expected war until 1943. Mussolini that Italy was not ready for war unless huge quantities of raw materials and armaments wee forthcoming. Hitler was thus forced to go to war without the aid of his Italian ally. As the Germans swept all before them Mussolini became convinced that unless he acted quickly the war would be over and Italy would have made no gains. Thus on the 10th of June 1940 Italy joined the war in the side of Germany against what he called 'the reactionary democracies of the West. This was a decision that ultimately led to his downfall and the collapse of the Fascist state. Any examination of Mussolini's foreign policy show that his was a complex and contradictory personality, all too willing to believe in the myth of his own infallibility. He had little capacity for long-range planning and was more concerned with the winning of prestige for himself and his Fascist state. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a knowledgeable and well written account that provides lots of information but lacks analytical points to directly address the question. The chronological structure does not make it easy for the author to evaluate the importance of events. 3 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 06/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    Japan created the puppet state of Manchukuo, and withdrew from the League after a report condemning the invasion was submitted to the League by Lord Lytton. The League was proved ineffective on the grounds that it could effectively do nothing else.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    Interpretation B mentions the end of feudalism with the Civil Code, ?While there is?social designs.? Interpretation B shows clearly that while Napoleon was greatly reforming regarding France, within the Empire?s subject states this reforming attitude was put second behind his need of the subject states for his military and dynastic ambitions.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    and meant workers were worked very hard and weren?t given any time to relax or catch up on sleep etc. This made them reach exhaustion very easily and many workers fell ill quickly under Stalin. Working conditions also decreased rapidly.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    Prussia's dominance was assured in Germany, founding the North German Confederation, an essentially Prussian controlled union, and as chancellor of Prussia, controlled by Bismarck. It was only a matter of time before unification occurred, the southern states conceding to the union, under the rule of Prussia, with Bismarck at the helm until his resignation in 1890.

  1. What impact did war have on the French Revolution 1789-1799?

    the biggest conditioner to the course of the French Revolution from 1792 onwards. Even before war broke out, the fear of foreign intervention and internal revolt was rife, evident in the King's Flight to Varennes. When war did indeed break out against Austria and Prussia, the fear and discontent with

  2. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    punish the Jews and Hitler's violent nature, but nonetheless, Hitler did not link these three components together within it. Dawidowicz, uses the benefit of hindsight to draw these links together and although this is a logical step, we should not assume that Hitler personally made these links.

  1. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    In fact before Collectivisation had spread in 1930 the Soviet Union produced 85 million tonnes but in 1934 the figures dropped to 69 million tonnes. But Collectivisation was not all bad it provided a large scale organisation of food and although there were losses in the country there were gains

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    There are two basic arguments with appeasement. The first suggests that it was a weak policy that fed Hitler?s appetite for more territorial demands in Europe. This may have been the case and it is likely that Hitler invaded Poland thinking that the British would accept this when in fact they did not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work