• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others than to his own strengths. To what extent is this true?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mussolini's rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others than to his own strengths. To what extent is this true? In the 1922 general election, Mussolini won no more than 2% of the parliamentary seats yet, by the end of the year the leader of the Fascist Party had become dictator of Italy. He had nowhere near enough electoral backing to establish a government and, had his march on Rome gone ahead his squads could easily have been crushed. He was handed the position by a few governing ´┐Żlites; there was no election, little resistance and no seizure of power. The issue of who was to blame for this unelected success in Italy's so-called democracy is highly controversial and undecided amongst historians. While most historians accept that there were numerous contributing factors, there is disagreement as to the significance of each factor. In his book 'Modern Italy', Martin Clark1 places the emphasis on the failure of the King and the elite. However E. Tannenbaum primarily blames the governmental failure to rebuild a strong Italy after the unification2. In my opinion both are important, as are other factors such as Mussolini's own skills, the political system and the politician's failure to work together in strong coalitions. In this essay I will discuss the argument that the failures of others played a greater role in Mussolini's rise to power than his own strengths. I will explore all the contributing factors to his rise to power in order to reach my conclusion. Problems The Liberal governments had been unable to solve Italy's problems caused by her unification in 1861; leaving her vulnerable to extremists such as Mussolini in 1922. Mussolini's skills enabled him to exploit the situations in Italy to help his own means. The famous historian Denis Mack Smith stresses the role of Mussolini in manipulating a complex situation3. The ´┐Żlite had agreed that they had to create a unified nation; D'Angelo famously said "we have made Italy; now we must make Italians"4. ...read more.

Middle

He underestimated Mussolini and was convinced that Mussolini could be tamed and his squads used to his own advantage. The pact gave the Fascists the springboard they needed to establish themselves as a serious political player and gave them 35 seats in the Chamber of Deputies. Mussolini carefully selected these candidates ensuring their respectability and moderation which was important as the Squadristi violence was starting to lose Mussolini governmental support. This shows that although Mussolini was aware that Squadristi violence was beneficial in some ways, this alone would not get him into government. The unintelligent, foolish decision made by Giolitti shows great weakness on his part. It also shows how easily Mussolini was able to exploit politicians; proving him to be good negotiator and showing his ability make the most of the weaknesses of others. Mussolini was also underestimated by D'Annunzio who saw Mussolini as his chief propagandist and fund raiser rather than as a rival or a threat; Mussolini used this to his advantage. He supported the Government's decision to crush D'Annunzio's coup of the Fiume; as a result D'Annunzio lost his power base and it removed all of Mussolini's rivals for power on the Right. Many of the Liberal politicians believed that they could use Mussolini to strengthen their position to defeat rivals. Mussolini cleverly played on this, negotiating with each politician about coalitions and political deals with the Fascists. None of the influential politicians were se men were willing to work together to prevent Mussolini nor did they have the power individually. Facta could have convinced Giolitti to end his differences with D'Annunzio and take steps towards forming a stronger coalition. Together Giolitti and D'Annunzio would have been considerably stronger than Facta's government and would have had the ability to put pressure on the King to use the Army to crush Mussolini's violence and end his "March on Rome. In order to combat the threat of this happening, Mussolini opened up his own negotiations with D'Annunzio in 1922. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mussolini's leadership and strategy gave the movement flexibility and energy which contrasted with the weak, tired government. The weak situation in Italy created by the unification and the war was handled poorly by the subsequent governments, leaving Italy's people discontented and willing to support extreme parties such as the Socialists and Fascists. The extremes deeply opposed each other using terror and violence which increased the view that Italy needed strong leadership which it did not find in the divided Liberal governments. The Liberal politicians failed to work together and wanted power for themselves. Italy's political situation of proportional representation forced politicians into coalition governments which along with their underestimation of Mussolini left them vulnerable to the Fascists. The Fascists took over because the Middle classes had become convinced that after the war, successive governments had been unable to combat the spread of socialism. The King's decision not to use the army against the March on Rome was a poor one, which lead to him handing power to Mussolini without a struggle or fight. 1 Source: Modern Italy 1871-1982, Martin Clark, Longman History of Italy 2 3 4 5 Source: Mussolini from Socialist to Fascist by David Williamson pg 14, Hodder and Stoughton. 6 7 8 9 10 Source: Mussolini from Socialist to Fascist by David Williamson p.23, Hodder and Stoughton, from quote in D. Mack Smith, Mussolini, Phoenix Paperback, 1994 p.51 11 Source: Modern Italy 1871-1982, Martin Clark, Longman History of Italy p. 221. 12 Source: Modern Italy 1871-1982, Martin Clark, Longman History of Italy p. 221. 13 Source: Mussolini from Socialist to Fascist by David Williamson pg 12, Hodder and Stoughton 14 Source: fascist Italy, John Hite and Chris Hinton, Advanced History Core texts, The Schools History Project official text, John Murray. ?? ?? ?? ?? Personal Study, Forth Draft Mussolini's rise to power owes more to the failures of others than to his own strengths. To what extent is this true? By Rebecca Haworth 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    There is a theory that it was the hidden international power brokers who wanted him in power because they knew that he would start World War Two, and this would create enormous wealth for the international elite and the global war machine.

  2. "The Personality Of Mussolini Was The Main Factor In His Rise To Power"

    Because the South was so poor due to the high taxes and lack of industry, powerful clans of Mafia emerged. 0.01% of the population owned up to 50% of the land. Many of the politicians in Italy were seen as corrupt and untrustworthy.

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    The settlement has also been criticised for restoring rulers on the basis of legitimacy, and disregarding public opinion. Archduke John wrote in his diary 'we cursed Napoleon and his system, and justly so, for he disregarded mankind... now the very men who fought against it are walking in his footsteps.'19

  2. Why was Mussolini able to come to power?

    Liberals opposed to the war abandoned moderate parties to become extreme socialists and as a result the nationalists condemned the regime for its inaction and inability to control the left. In addition to an increase in domestic opposition, the regime faced the threat of increased male suffrage.

  1. How Secure was Liberal Italy in 1914?

    Accompanied by this, despite the governments efforts to raise literacy levels through education, 70% of Italians could not read or write. It would take a huge amount of effort and money that the country simply didn't have to overturn this, but it was an investment that needed to be made.

  2. Why was Mussolini appointed Prime Minister in 1922?

    Farmers, Factory workers, Artists, Poets, Anarchists, Nationalists and Publicans but these people didn't have the money to put into the movement unless there was a socialist revolution. However by 1922 Mussolini's ideas had changed from being left wing to right wing and as a consequence so did his supporters.

  1. Fascist education and youth policies played a major role in helping Mussolini secure his ...

    the efforts to indoctrinate children it has been estimated that 40% of all those aged between 8 and 18 managed to avoid joining fascist youth groups. By the late 1930s the Italian youth movement and the fascist student unions had over 8 million members.

  2. "Italy Unified Itself". To what extent is this statement true?

    previous pope by being a liberal and eager for reforms: a man of the people. Through him, the Italians found a leader who would sympathize with their discontent, and regardless of the failures in the 1820s revolutions, more insurrections arose in 1848.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work