• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Must a defensible theory of the morality of war must integrate moral reasoning with institutional theory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

QUESTION 4, HANDED IN BY 4325000 This essay aims to critically investigate if a defensible theory of the morality of war must integrate moral reasoning with institutional theory. It is essential for this essay to identify where just war theory is situated within the tradition of philosophy of ethics of war. Just war theory is considered to be one of three dominant traditions of thought on ethics of war, along with realism and pacifism. Just war theory is usually identified as the middle course between political realism and pacifism. "Just war theory offers rules to guide decision-makers on the appropriateness of their conduct during the resort to war, conduct during war and the termination phase of the conflict"1. Throughout history a number of philosophers, such as: Augustine, Thomas Aquinas and Immanuel Kant have offered their accounts of just war theory. Evens so, today one book is recognised as the dominant source of just war theory; Michael Walzer's work "Just and Unjust Wars". This essay will revolve around the account of just war theory he offers in this book. Structured around "Just and Unjust Wars", this essay will first introduce in depth, the key elements of just war theory as offered by Michael Walzer to develop a better understanding of the core theoretical approaches to just war theory. Then, some elementary criticisms to why just war needs to incorporate institutional theory will be presented. These criticisms will further be illustrated by an example taken from the article "How the United States justified its war on terrorism: prime morality and the construction of a "just war", by Colin Flint and Ghazi-Walid Falah. ...read more.

Middle

"Even if we regard the duty to intervene as an enforceable duty, it cannot be enforced until an agent is specified to do the intervening. If that duty falls on every state, those states can join in establishing institutions to perform it. This suggests a general moral argument for international government - at a minimum, for establishing and developing political institutions to prevent violence not between states but also within states. Even if states are unable to respond directly to violence in other states, they have a duty to support just and effective institutions at the international level to control it, and they must comply with the laws and policies of those institutions"7. Would this make for a more defensible theory of just war? As George Mavrodes argues at the end of his article "Conventions and the Morality of War": "I suggest that the immunity of non-combatants is not an independent moral rule but rather part of a convention which sets up a morally desirable alternative to war. I argued that some conventions, including this one, generate special moral obligations which cannot be satisfactorily explained and defended without reference to a convention"8. Michael Walzer insists that legal rules defining war are beside the point. He agrees that legal rules, for example forbidding means Mala in Se, such as; forbidding landmines or chemical weapons, could to some extent be desirable, but they are not morally obligatory. Soldiers will be killed, and in which matter they are killed cannot matter that much. ...read more.

Conclusion

"There exist important gaps in the law that needs to be filled by greater attention to moral principles like just war and the historical development of those principles"15. For a defensible theory of the morality of war, it seems evident that institutional theory, binding laws and rules, must be incorporated into a philosophical argument to create a more effective just war theory and thus a theory that would be supported by all. WORD COUNT: 2496 1 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/war/ 2 Orend, B. (2001) Just and Lawful Conduct in War: Reflections on Michael Walzer, p. 2 3 Walzer, M. (1992) Just and Unjust Wars, p. 60-62 4 Walzer, M. (1992) Just and Unjust Wars, p. 21 5 Nardin, T. (2006) International political theory and the question of justice, p. 457 6 Walzer, M. (1992) Just and Unjust Wars, p. 21 7 Nardin, T. (2006) International political theory and the question of justice, p. 463 8 Mavrodes, G., I. (1975) Conventions and the Morality of War, p. 130-131 9 Buchanan, A. (2006) Institutionalizing the Just War, p. 2 10 Buchanan, A. (2006) Institutionalizing the Just War, p. 12 11 Buchanan, A. (2006) Institutionalizing the Just War, p. 38 12 Flint, C. and Falah G-W (2004) How the United States justified its war on terrorism: prime morality and the construction of a "just war", p. 1379 13 Flint, C. and Falah G-W (2004) How the United States justified its war on terrorism: prime morality and the construction of a "just war", p. 1390 14 Buchanan, A. (2006) Institutionalizing the Just War, p. 35 15 Lang, A. (2002) Civilians and War: Dilemmas in Law and Morality, p. 3 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Does Realism as a statist Ideology exist today?

    This is strong evidence that realism exists to an extent now, as states seek to maximize their interests, for example the US allegedly did when they invaded Iraq, with the intention to capture Iraqi oil.

  2. Missile Defence

    the United States militarily just as the soviets did during the Cold war. The argument now from the Bush Administration side is the defense system is generally needed to curb the threat from rogue states and terrorist groups such as Al-Qaida. These rogue states include Iraq, Iran, and North Korea.

  1. "Keep the dogs hungry, they will follow you". Such was in essence, the ruling ...

    According to the official version of the coup, soldiers won to Qabus' side surrounded the old palace one early morning last July and, after a brief clash with the Sultan's forces, took charge. The old Sultan himself suffered five wounds but survived to be deposed.

  2. History of the United States

    On the other hand, southerners, a rural and widely dispersed people, feared the cities and the power of remote bankers. With Thomas JEFFERSON they worked to counteract the Federalists' anglicized vision of the United States. Southerners rejected the concept of an active government, preferring one committed to laissez-faire (that is, allowing people to act without government interference)

  1. The purpose of my examination of war is to question whether the resort to ...

    Once this fundamental principle of human rights is accepted, it can effectively argued what is wrong with some acts of war, namely aggression against sovereignty and the basic human rights thereof. Within our current system, centred around state sovereignty a fundamental principal is non intervention and non-aggression of one state into the affairs of another states sovereignty.

  2. With particular reference to one of the themes studied in the module critically assess ...

    Furthermore peace will be maintained by the role of multilateral institutions such as the United Nations, the World Bank etc. they would bring together different states and countries, again contributing to the foundation of peace. The role of the United Nation's is significant for a liberalist as it would act

  1. American History.

    - At one point NY Representative James Tallmadge, Jr. proposed gradual emancipation in Missouri, which outraged Southerners. Although the House passed the Tallmadge amendment, the Senate rejected it. - Finally, in 1820 House Speaker Henry Clay proposed the Missouri Compromise - Maine would enter as a free state [it was

  2. What are the main features of the 'just war theory'? Examine and comment on ...

    must be declared by those with responsibility for public order, not by private groups or individuals. This in most cases would be the government but in some cases it may be the religious leader. Thomas Aquinas also made it clear that there must be a just cause for going to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work