• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nato.There is no doubt that in it's prime NATO was a very successful organisation, succeeding in its aim of preventing Soviet expansion and preventing the outbreak of major European war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

NATO In 1949 with the ever present threat of attack from the communist east, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) was formed, it's main aim to protect it's member countries in Western Europe from any further expansion by the Soviet Union and their communist ideologies. In short if a member state were attacked, the others would be there to assist it in its time of need and so therefore safeguarding the freedom and security of the capitalist states. Today however with the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, is this organisation really necessary or a waste of valuable resources and finances? There is no doubt that in it's prime NATO was a very successful organisation, succeeding in its aim of preventing Soviet expansion and preventing the outbreak of major European war. ...read more.

Middle

which would remove the need of a joint defence organisation like NATO. As well as changing times and attitudes there is also the issue of money and the costs of running NATO. The running of this defence organisation is by no means cheap, hundreds of millions of pounds being spent on weapons alone. Many people feel that this is an unnecessary waste of public money and without NATO it would be better spent. Things such as hospitals and school could be built using the money, which would be far more beneficial to the people of the member states than weapons of mass destruction for a war, which may never happen. Despite all of this NATO has been very successful in many ways and as I mentioned previously it has helped significantly with the unification of Europe. ...read more.

Conclusion

There are many extremists ready to take up leadership after Boris Yeltsin and if this happens NATO may be needed. There will always be a slight threat of communist regimes spreading throughout Europe but this would be significantly less with a force such as NATO to rely on. Without it, every state would stand alone, divided and conquered. In conclusion I feel that although costs are too high and the money required could be better spent, NATO is a worthwhile organisation and should continue to exist today despite the lack of communist threat. I do believe however that it has to be modernised to deal with the issues of the 21st century and not that of when it was formed but this already seems to be taking place. If anything it contributes greatly to international peace keeping and helps unify its member states, which I feel can only be a good thing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    Nonetheless, they did not take direct action like the Soviets did. All of the afore mentioned are relevant not only to show the way in which they provoked the USSR but also as some of the reasons as to why the US adopted the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan.

  2. Westward Expansion.

    Acquiring the western territories also relieved fears of any old world foes, and made the United States the dominate fore in North America.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Only if the Soviets "played the international game with us in accordance with our standards," Harriman declared, should the United States offer assistance. By April 1945, Harriman had moved to an even more hard-line position. "We must clearly recognize," he said, "that the Soviet program is the establishment of totalitarianism, ending personal liberty and democracy."

  2. To what extent was Soviet expansion responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War ...

    But Truman still felt that communism was particularly attractive to poor and discontented people and it could best be resisted by economic prosperity, therefore, he thought that a prosperous Europe with close commercial links to the United States was less likely to fall under communist influence.

  1. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    * Luxury goods were just not available, or were only available in special shops for Party bureaucrats or managers. * Housing was in short supply, because it was low on the Party's priorities, and overcrowding common. Clothes, shoes boots, materials to repair things, were also difficult to get hold of, so the quality of life deteriorated too.

  2. Why did communism collapse in Eastern Europe?

    refusing to accept the Russian general Rokossovsky as the Polish Minister for Defence. (9) The situation was diffused by a compromise which was made on both sides, with Poland agreeing to remain in the communist Eastern bloc if the nationalist communist leader Gomulka, who had been imprisoned by Stalin, was reinstated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work