• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nato.There is no doubt that in it's prime NATO was a very successful organisation, succeeding in its aim of preventing Soviet expansion and preventing the outbreak of major European war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

NATO In 1949 with the ever present threat of attack from the communist east, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) was formed, it's main aim to protect it's member countries in Western Europe from any further expansion by the Soviet Union and their communist ideologies. In short if a member state were attacked, the others would be there to assist it in its time of need and so therefore safeguarding the freedom and security of the capitalist states. Today however with the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, is this organisation really necessary or a waste of valuable resources and finances? There is no doubt that in it's prime NATO was a very successful organisation, succeeding in its aim of preventing Soviet expansion and preventing the outbreak of major European war. ...read more.

Middle

which would remove the need of a joint defence organisation like NATO. As well as changing times and attitudes there is also the issue of money and the costs of running NATO. The running of this defence organisation is by no means cheap, hundreds of millions of pounds being spent on weapons alone. Many people feel that this is an unnecessary waste of public money and without NATO it would be better spent. Things such as hospitals and school could be built using the money, which would be far more beneficial to the people of the member states than weapons of mass destruction for a war, which may never happen. Despite all of this NATO has been very successful in many ways and as I mentioned previously it has helped significantly with the unification of Europe. ...read more.

Conclusion

There are many extremists ready to take up leadership after Boris Yeltsin and if this happens NATO may be needed. There will always be a slight threat of communist regimes spreading throughout Europe but this would be significantly less with a force such as NATO to rely on. Without it, every state would stand alone, divided and conquered. In conclusion I feel that although costs are too high and the money required could be better spent, NATO is a worthwhile organisation and should continue to exist today despite the lack of communist threat. I do believe however that it has to be modernised to deal with the issues of the 21st century and not that of when it was formed but this already seems to be taking place. If anything it contributes greatly to international peace keeping and helps unify its member states, which I feel can only be a good thing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    This in turn prompted the Soviets to declare their possession of the atomic bomb in 1949. This tendency of the Americans to intimidate the Soviets through the threat of the atomic bomb had long been adopted ever since 1945, when by the time of the Potsdam Conference, the US had

  2. Westward Expansion.

    Acquiring the western territories also relieved fears of any old world foes, and made the United States the dominate fore in North America.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    when it rose in massive rebellion against German occupation forces in hopes of linking up with advancing Soviet forces. The Warsaw Poles generally supported the London government-in-exile. As Red Army troops moved to just six miles outside of Warsaw, the Warsaw Poles rose en masse against their Nazi oppressors.

  2. To what extent was Soviet expansion responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War ...

    The American help would be mainly in terms of economic and military aid. This meant the Greek government was able to defeat the communists. The civil war was finally ended in 1949 and the success of Greece in resisting the communist threat was seen by the West as a victory of the capitalist bloc over the communist bloc.

  1. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    * New industrial centres - like Magnitogorsk - were built from nothing. By 1938 it was producing 5,000 tons of steel a day. There were many other examples like this. * The fact that Russia was able to resist German invasion in 1941 - just - and then go on

  2. Why did communism collapse in Eastern Europe?

    refusing to accept the Russian general Rokossovsky as the Polish Minister for Defence. (9) The situation was diffused by a compromise which was made on both sides, with Poland agreeing to remain in the communist Eastern bloc if the nationalist communist leader Gomulka, who had been imprisoned by Stalin, was reinstated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work