• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nazi living standards essay

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

On balance, the impact of Nazi policies on living standards in Germany in the years 1933-39 was unfavourable. How far do you agree with this opinion? Standard of living can be defined as the quantity and quality of goods available to the public. It could also be measured on how the standards affect people mentally and physically. In Nazi Germany between the years 1933 and 1939 the economy suffered horrendously and this meant that money was worth less and less goods were available to the public. Rearmament was the priority for the government from 1936 and Germany suffered as a result of this through lack of goods. The three main social classes in Nazi Germany were the workers, the Mittelstand and big businesses. The workers out of the three groups probably benefited from the Nazi's policies the most. There was a huge raise in the number of jobs available to the workers. This meant that more people were being taken off of the unemployment register and more people were in employment. This would have been a huge benefit for this social class because although consumer goods were not being produced as they used to, more jobs in factories regarding rearmament were available. ...read more.

Middle

The Mittelstand were probably the biggest losers out of the three groups. A large portion of the Mittelstand lost their jobs, and living, through debt and reduction in specialised craftsmen. As the priority for the Nazis was rearmament the Mittelstand suffered from a reduction in imports and generally farm life was a thing of the past and people were now suffering from this. Farmers were losing their facilities and life was become very poor on farms. I don't think that the future of Germany was in rural areas because the Nazis had started a new era in Germany and war was the long term situation in Germany. The rural population fell by 3% and this was probably mostly because farmers knew that their businesses wouldn't sell like it used to and they had to get new jobs in factories that were in the city. They had to move on. The businesses that did stay on had to compete with larger firms as well and this simply wasn't possible. I believe that the Nazis made huge mistakes in their actions and anyone who didn't work in the city was going to lose out with the new policies. Rural life had been put to the side and it was simply worse off. ...read more.

Conclusion

One of the main losses for the big businesses was that they could not have any imports. Although it would mean that there was a good balance of trade it meant that materials that could be required were not available. Another disadvantage was that the state controlled the trade of businesses. I imagine that businesses would have liked to control their own trade and to have somebody else doing it instead would have been a disadvantage as they wouldn't have a great idea of how their trade was bearing. In conclusion I agree that 'on balance, the impact of Nazi policies on living standards in Germany in the years 1933-39 was unfavourable'. The majority of people suffered more than they benefited. I just don't think that the Nazis had considered everyone in their policies and it shows. They only seemed to care about rearmament and I think that this was the whole point of the Nazi party. As long as it was achieving what it wished it didn't really care about what else happened. In the whole the Mittelstand didn't benefit at all, the workers briefly benefited and the businesses benefited momentarily. There weren't enough benefits to call the policies a success for the whole of Germany. Only certain areas actually benefited and this meant that Germany didn't really receive any favours from the Nazi policies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The most effective regional and national speakers were used on more important occasions. Through posters and leaflet campaigns controlled from above, local groups mobilized people for mass rallies of varying sizes. The Nazis used a technique of saturation advertising. They would schedule 70 to 200 rallies in the space of one to two weeks in one district.

  2. This essay will examine the rise of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the Holocaust ...

    These murders were the responsibility of the "Einsatzgruppen" or mobile killing units. The Einsatzgruppen followed behind the Army as they invaded and it was their job to murder those seen to be political or racial opponents of the Nazi regime.

  1. Lenin and his life

    The thoughts that dominated his mind at the time were of "maintaining and strengthening the union of socialist republics"(Gasgen,S. The Question of Nationalities or "Autonomisation"), not of the people. War Communism also had severe implications for the social aspects of life in Russia.

  2. Assess the impact of Nazi ideology on the Social Classes.

    gained some improved facilities they lost their freedom and, with the suppression of trade unions, any political power that they had once had. Workers felt cheated because they had been promised an increase in wages and in reality were working longer hours for less or very little than they had been earning in the Weimar years.

  1. Did the Nazi arms economy make war an economic necessity?

    Under the auspices of Gring's extensive authority [11] the role of the state as economic arbiter was enlarged, not through direct ownership and requisitions, but through the creation of an intricate and increasingly pervasive set of regulations. These regulations and controls allowed the state to range freely over all spheres

  2. British Course Essay

    the power to issue rules and regulations for the management of he poor law. This was for modernisation efficiency and control. Edwin Chadwick was secretary to the commission. The commission's greatest and longest lasting problem was the difficulty of enforcing its will.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work