• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

No more than a fringe irritant on Weimar politics. How far does this description define the Nazi Party in the 1920s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?No more than a fringe irritant on Weimar politics?. How far does this description define the Nazi Party in the 1920s? In 1920, the NSDAP, which had been founded by Drexler in 1919, drew up its 25-point programme and Hitler quickly became the driving force behind the party. It has been argued that the Nazi party can be described as ?no more than a fringe irritant on Weimar politics? during the 1920s based on their fluctuating electoral support, internal divides, as well as being just one amongst an array of other extremist parties during this period. However, although this is true to an extent, it is also clear that after the onset of the Great Depression in 1929, the Nazi Party exploited the weaknesses of the Weimar Republic which in turn lead to electoral success. Thus, from this point on Hitler and the Nazi Party were of much more significance on Weimar politics. At the start of the 1920s, the NSDAP was a minute force, and even Hitler described at the time that the party was operating ?at a low club level form?. Under Anton Drexler?s leadership, the DAP were very much a fringe irritant contained to a beer hall, designed to air nationalist views and calls for Bavarian Independence. ...read more.

Middle

This was miniscule in comparison to the SPD who won 29.8% of the vote and the Centre Party who won 12.1% of the vote. This serves as evidence of the fact that even in 1928, the Nazi Party was not nationally successful and could therefore still be described as a ?fringe irritant?. However, although the momentum of the party may not have picked up until 1929, the failure of the Munich Putsch in 1923 did have some advantages for Hitler. He turned his trial into a great propaganda success both for himself and for the Nazi cause as he won respect from right-wing nationalists. He played on all his rhetorical skills and evoked admiration for patriotism, thus making himself a national figure for the first time. Hitler?s time in prison, which was reduced to 9 months due to bias of the judiciary, gave him time to write Mein Kampf, formulate his political ideas (although they were still unclear), as well as to accept that the party would need to take power through legal means. Thus, it can be seen that following his release from prison, Hitler worked to make sure that his Party would be in a position to exploit the political situation once circumstances changed in his favour. ...read more.

Conclusion

The increase in rural support along with the fact that Hitler joined the Anti-Young Plan helped to distance himself from the Weimar Republic as well as granting himself and his party respectability and legitimacy. In conclusion, it is undoubtedly true that by 1929 it seemed that Nazism had not taken root and there was no real sign that it could flourish in Germany. The party had few seats in the Reichstag, the Munich Putsch was a failure in terms of taking control, the ?Golden Years? decreased the support for extremist parties and the Nazi Party was very much constrained to Bavaria. However, it is also clear that the onset of the Great Depression provided the circumstances which the Nazi Party, having re-established itself and invested in modern and effective technological propaganda techniques, could exploit in their favour. Thus in 1929, as the party shifted its emphasis to target the depressed agricultural sector; its membership began to rapidly increase again. The Nazi Party may therefore have been not more than a ?fringe irritant? by 1929 but as soon as the Depression was to take effect, the party had constructed an effective party machine with a leader of tremendous political skill and charisma to take advantage of the crisis. From 1929 onwards the Nazi party went from strength to strength, and Hitler?s appointment as Chancellor in 1933 represented the collapse of Weimar politics. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

    Despite this, Hindenburg moved further to the right, and eventually asked Br�ning to step down as Chancellor. On the 30th of May 1932, Br�ning announced his resignation from the post as Chancellor following this disloyalty from Hindenburg, although he refused to make the President's disloyalty public as he was still a strong supporter of his.

  2. How successful were Nazi policies towards women?

    not coincide with the original promises that the Nazi party had made to German women. Hitler had promised women a return to the traditional role that they had previously held in the family and the promotion of breaking marriage vows and 'sleeping around' in this way, simply for the benefit

  1. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    The Weimar Government faced an association with the war defeat; the humiliation of the Treaty of Versailles and the reparations. This hindered the Weimar government right from the start, as many Germans considered the signing of the Treaty of Versailles treason.

  2. Impact of The Great Famine on Irelands Society, Economy and Politics

    In the years before and during the famine, Irish people relied heavily on the potato crop as a means of life. The fact that the potato blight was so easily spread, made Ireland an ideal location for the blight to prosper, given the climate and weather, as Mary E, Daly depicts in 'The Famine in Ireland' (1986, p53)

  1. How stable was the Weimar Republic 1924-29 ?

    of production as it was during the First World War which looked promising. Overall the economy was shaping and rising up making the stability of the government stable and strong. Yet even though the reparations were reorganized, they still caused a great national resentment as the Germans thought they were

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Stalin was respected as a strong leader. 6. The Five Year Plans achieved remarkable growth, and gave the USSR a strong base for further development ï hydro-electric projects and an increase in steel production by 400%. 7. Consumer good availability rose due to the Five Year Plans.

  1. The Weimar Republic was doomed from the start! How far does the evidence ...

    and economic strife that Germany had experienced in the past decade encouraged extremist groups to gain seats in the Reichstag, with the system of proportional representation allowing them to exist. Another term of the Constitution which comes into question is the position that the President held, more specifically, article 48.

  2. (RE) To what extent did the Weimar Republic in the 1920s overcome the problems ...

    Many people, especially the German nationalists, opposed The Young Plan as they believed that accepting the Young Plan meant accepting defeat overall. It meant confessing to the 'war guilt clause', which had not been modified under the Young Plan. Furthermore Germans were not happy as the Young Plan actually undermined

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work