• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

No more than a fringe irritant on Weimar politics. How far does this description define the Nazi Party in the 1920s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?No more than a fringe irritant on Weimar politics?. How far does this description define the Nazi Party in the 1920s? In 1920, the NSDAP, which had been founded by Drexler in 1919, drew up its 25-point programme and Hitler quickly became the driving force behind the party. It has been argued that the Nazi party can be described as ?no more than a fringe irritant on Weimar politics? during the 1920s based on their fluctuating electoral support, internal divides, as well as being just one amongst an array of other extremist parties during this period. However, although this is true to an extent, it is also clear that after the onset of the Great Depression in 1929, the Nazi Party exploited the weaknesses of the Weimar Republic which in turn lead to electoral success. Thus, from this point on Hitler and the Nazi Party were of much more significance on Weimar politics. At the start of the 1920s, the NSDAP was a minute force, and even Hitler described at the time that the party was operating ?at a low club level form?. Under Anton Drexler?s leadership, the DAP were very much a fringe irritant contained to a beer hall, designed to air nationalist views and calls for Bavarian Independence. ...read more.

Middle

This was miniscule in comparison to the SPD who won 29.8% of the vote and the Centre Party who won 12.1% of the vote. This serves as evidence of the fact that even in 1928, the Nazi Party was not nationally successful and could therefore still be described as a ?fringe irritant?. However, although the momentum of the party may not have picked up until 1929, the failure of the Munich Putsch in 1923 did have some advantages for Hitler. He turned his trial into a great propaganda success both for himself and for the Nazi cause as he won respect from right-wing nationalists. He played on all his rhetorical skills and evoked admiration for patriotism, thus making himself a national figure for the first time. Hitler?s time in prison, which was reduced to 9 months due to bias of the judiciary, gave him time to write Mein Kampf, formulate his political ideas (although they were still unclear), as well as to accept that the party would need to take power through legal means. Thus, it can be seen that following his release from prison, Hitler worked to make sure that his Party would be in a position to exploit the political situation once circumstances changed in his favour. ...read more.

Conclusion

The increase in rural support along with the fact that Hitler joined the Anti-Young Plan helped to distance himself from the Weimar Republic as well as granting himself and his party respectability and legitimacy. In conclusion, it is undoubtedly true that by 1929 it seemed that Nazism had not taken root and there was no real sign that it could flourish in Germany. The party had few seats in the Reichstag, the Munich Putsch was a failure in terms of taking control, the ?Golden Years? decreased the support for extremist parties and the Nazi Party was very much constrained to Bavaria. However, it is also clear that the onset of the Great Depression provided the circumstances which the Nazi Party, having re-established itself and invested in modern and effective technological propaganda techniques, could exploit in their favour. Thus in 1929, as the party shifted its emphasis to target the depressed agricultural sector; its membership began to rapidly increase again. The Nazi Party may therefore have been not more than a ?fringe irritant? by 1929 but as soon as the Depression was to take effect, the party had constructed an effective party machine with a leader of tremendous political skill and charisma to take advantage of the crisis. From 1929 onwards the Nazi party went from strength to strength, and Hitler?s appointment as Chancellor in 1933 represented the collapse of Weimar politics. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful were Nazi policies towards women?

    of the state, was making family relationships very difficult and was pulling families apart in a complete contradiction to Nazi propaganda. The new regime also shaped a clear policy in their negative view towards women at work and in particular educated women who were in professional jobs and the education

  2. How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

    However, with Goebbel's relentless propaganda, rival nationalist groups could not compete with the almost legend-like portrayal of Hitler, and he soon became the figurehead of the opposition. Donations, too, helped the party progress, and the fact that at the same time as the Nazi party was being funded by wealthy,

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Rumors continued to circulate about incipient SA revolts. There were additional losses in state and local elections in November and December, and it was clear that the Nazis had reached a limit with their voting constituency. They could not break the refusal of Catholic and working-class voters to vote for them.

  2. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    The Weimar Government faced an association with the war defeat; the humiliation of the Treaty of Versailles and the reparations. This hindered the Weimar government right from the start, as many Germans considered the signing of the Treaty of Versailles treason.

  1. Impact of The Great Famine on Irelands Society, Economy and Politics

    Statistics from Wesley Johnston (2008) show that 30% of people in Ireland spoke the Irish language but by 1961 this had decreased to 24%. It should be noted that the famine was not fully responsible for the culture collapse - the process was already underway by the time the famine hit Ireland, as people learned the English language as a means of bettering themselves.

  2. How stable was the Weimar Republic 1924-29 ?

    Improvement in hospitals, electricity supplies, and 40% of federal government expenditure went on war-related pensions to invalids, widows and orphans; in all 2.5 million people. A further major advance in welfare provision was made in 1927 when the social insurance scheme was extended to protect over 17 million workers in event of unemployment.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Stalin’s dictatorship: USSR came close to being a totalitarian society ï the State controls every aspect of people’s lives, not just activities but thoughts too. The mixture of propaganda, education and terror was never enough to make the country completely totalitarian, for two reasons: 1. It was not efficient enough.

  2. The Weimar Republic was doomed from the start! How far does the evidence ...

    Both the position of the President and the body that was the Reichstag were arguably equal in power in order to check each other?s power, a design which was meant to ensure that neither the President nor the Reichstag became too powerful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work