• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

North American History

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

North American History In the words of Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, two great rivals in American History, were not only their honor and image, but the principles and ideals that would lead the legislation of a country in the frustrated process of amalgamation and integration. As Abraham Lincoln proposed in his Republican State Convention of 1858 speech, there were two American clashing ideologies in debate, ideologies that could not coexist forever within a "House Divided". Moreover, he emphasizes his beliefs when he states: "Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction, or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new, North as well as South" (Lincoln) By his immediate rhetorical question of "Have we no tendency to the latter condition?" (Lincoln) it is obvious that he, as a republican and abolitionist, is against the prevailing of the institution of slavery, something that is put into doubt by the accusations made to him by his opponent who adheres himself to prove the lack of congruence in Lincoln's speeches. ...read more.

Middle

The Dred Scott versus Stanford case only augmented the tension, making the questions of its constitutionality and rightfulness be debated across the nation. While Douglas's position tends to favor a patched agreement between south and north, one of "mutual non intervention" (Douglas) that could lead to further separation as we think, Lincoln's policy, ambiguous as it might be in certain respects, was very clear in one thing: the separation that up to now had existed dividing the country in two could not continue much further. For him, apart of his abolitionist principles, above all was the union of the Federation, he could not permit each part of the nation to take its own course, something that would change the fate of the United States forever. A pivotal period would come out of his later governance that would lean the countries future northwards, until again unity would rise much later. This intention would not be clear since the beginning of Lincoln's political career, despite his clear ideals regarding slavery. This is obvious in the difference in his "House Divided" speech, and his Sixth Joint Debate with Douglas, at Quincy. Even in the different speeches mentioned in the second paper, where the words of this leader can be confusing, there is certain continuity in his thought. ...read more.

Conclusion

I understand it another way, and therefore I am bound to support it in the way in which I understand it." (Lincoln), yet firm in his convictions. In conclusion, it can be said that the rivalry of these men and ideals they stand for are representative of a nation, a nation that is divided by many issues, of which slavery is a crucial one in understanding the different semi spheres that were being created within what was supposed to be a federation. Although the role of it as such had not yet been clearly defined, it was up for Abraham Lincoln, after he was elected leader, to define with these speeches and hints were making more evident. The American Civil War was just a step away, and Lincoln, Douglas and the slave owners could not agree on the topic that could free a large proportion of the population, the African slaves. Based on what we see, it is clear that what was to come would shape America into what it is now, a united, slave free nation. Yet these are the roots of what is taken for granted today. This antagonism fueled some of the fiercest and defining battles fought in U.S. continental grounds. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quick sands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood.

  2. US History. How would you characterize the positions of the North at the time ...

    (Norton 278B). Abolitionists who were evangelical Christians created a bridge between reform and politics. Two types of abolitionists existed. One was gradualists which sought the end of slavery through gradual and legal means. They tried convincing slaveholders that slavery was morally wrong and unethical through persistent pressure.

  1. What was the short term significance of settlement in Kansas in the 1850s and ...

    However, after the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed, pro-slavery and anti-slavery supporters rushed in to settle in Kansas so as to affect the outcome of the first election held there after the law went into effect. Pro-slavery settlers carried the election.

  2. To what extent do you agree with Abraham Lincoln that slavery was 'somehow the ...

    So in this way nationalism became a central issue to causing the Civil War. Most South even still saw themselves as loyal Americans and before 1860 the fire eaters who had been arguing for secession were the minority. They saw themselves in this way as most South still saw themselves as loyal Americans even though they had left the Union.

  1. How significant was the contribution of Robert J. Oppenheimer to the Manhattan Project?

    It was not that he contributed so many ideas or suggestions; he did so sometimes, but his main influence came from something else. It was his continuous and intense presence, which produced a sense of direct participation in all of us; it created that unique atmosphere of enthusiasm and challenge that pervaded the place throughout its time."

  2. To what extent did the American Civil War succeed in removing the two main ...

    Northern historians such as James Ford Rhodes particularly uphold this view: "...of the American Civil War it may safely be asserted that there was a cause, slavery" Slavery certainly was a huge force in America. In 1860, four million people were slaves with more that three million of these working in the South.

  1. Abraham Lincoln has been depicted as the American Hero who abolished slavery.

    As far as they were concerned, the constitution had elected, "...a man to High Office of President of the United States whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery..."3 Lincoln however was not an abolitionist and he refused to compromise on keeping slavery out of the territories.

  2. Why is the American Constitution called the Great Compromise?

    Fundamentally, the fact that two competing ?plans? for the legislature were drafted and proposed, with the result being mix of both, is clear evidence that a compromise took place on the issue of representation. Indeed, not only was the outcome known as the ?Connecticut Compromise?, but the ?Congress? that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work