• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

October Revolution in Russia - a genuine popular revolution or a coupdetat?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

October Revolution in Russia - a genuine popular revolution or a coupdetat? A. View it as a mass movement Russia in 1910's - revolutionary situation Grievances of the people - real An overwhelming percentage of population participated. Various classes had their discontent and were ready to express it in this mass movement. a. peasants' discontent b. workers' discontent c. educated classes' discontent d. nobility's discontent e. army's discontent Revolutionary groups were active and emerged as powerful, with the mass behind them. The Bolsheviks provided leadership for the revolution. They had plans and party programmes - power to the people (simplified the idea of socialism) and their famous slogan: bread, land, peace - voiced the need of the people, really appealed to them and won the acquiescence of the populace and the armies. From February to October, there was boiling over of mass discontent. February - mass demonstration and raging through the streets; the government could not control the country. There was lawlessness, confusion, and violence. ...read more.

Middle

- decided the time was ripe because of the international war situation rather then the mass behaviour in Russia. 4. The Bolsheviks had only begun to be a majority in Soviets in August. They had not built up a dominant influence among the people, especially in the countryside. Even Lenin needed to take time to convince the Bolshevik leaders about the time for political takeover. 5. Post-1917 situation was a civil war - the Bolsheviks needed to impose and consolidate their authority in the country by force - reign of terror and the use of Cheka. - they had not gained popular support in October, at least not the kind of support in which the people genuinely identified their interests with the Bolshevik faith. - the civil war lasted for 2 years, could not be solely explained by the presence of foreign troops. - after they seized power, they cut opposition by banning political parties and imprison opponents. ------------------------- What is a coupdetat? ...read more.

Conclusion

- middle class still had hope to have a reform from above - armies still loyal to the Czar - revolutionary parties were weak The Czarist government tried to revitalize its rule by reforms but was insincere and thus failed. People discontent remained. Discontent accumulated and finally released in the First World War. Why 1917 revolution successful? Bolshevik's idea on the chance of a successful revolution: - Chaos in which only the party who know what they wanted would be the final victor. - First World War provided such a chance. (details on its effects on the ruling house) - Thus the time was ripe now, Nicholas II was forced to abdicate. But the revolution did not produce a democratic government as usually happened in other country because the middle class was weak and they were unprepared for it. So the Bolsheviks finally seized power as they had predicted in such a chaos. ----------- Russian Revolution in 1917 was the work of Lenin? Without Lenin, there would be no Bolshevik Revolution? It implies that the time was not ripe for revolution, the success of the Bolsheviks resulted from luck and opportunism of Lenin. ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    Stalin used the people's grief for Lenin to his own advantage. He organised the funeral and made sure the people knew that Trotsky did not attend (he was unwell), making it seem like he did not care about Lenin. Stalin had to work particularly hard to improve the people's opinion

  2. The 1917 Revolution.

    As part of the deal Kerensky released Trotsky and other Bolshevik leaders from prison, and armed the workers. Kornilov's attempt to seize power fizzled out, as telegraph operators refused to send his orders, and railway workers controlled the vital communications.

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * The opera had been playing for two years to rave reviews before Stalin went to see it. He walked out. Following that it was denounced as 'cacaphonous' and 'pornographic'. * Shostakovitch suddenly found himself cast as villain rather than hero.

  2. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    The Soviet could effectively control the country through its workers, as factories only became operational once the Soviet ordered strikes to cease. This gave rise to the quote by Georgii Lvov (Prime Minister in the Provisional Government) that 'the Workman's Soviet is a power without authority'.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    material interests of the various groups which made up Russian society, and particularly to those groups in positions of power. The urban masses wanted bread, the soldiers wanted peace, and the peasantry sought land redistribution. Thus, the genius of Lenin's slogan "Bread, Peace and Land" is the way in which

  2. In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the ...

    A further point is that the Concordat candidly mentions the Revolution and without elaboration or untruths, forces the Church to acknowledge the Revolution. Not only does this ensure that its legacy lives on, even in religion, but also that it and its principles are accepted by the entire public, including the religious citizens.

  1. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    The soldiers were hardly trained and poorly supplied, and the people new it. No wonder that Russia had to suffer the greatest losses of all countries involved in war, even though they didn?t fight in it till the end. All of these factors led to the revolutions that took place in Russia during the year 1917.

  2. Why did revolution in Russia succeed in February 1917 and not in 1905? (30 ...

    With the army refusing to crush the workers unlike in 1905, the Tsar?s only chance of survival lay with the Liberals in the State Duma who had formed the Provisional Government. As explored, the Provisional Government refused to cooperate with the Tsar in February 1917.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work