• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

October Revolution in Russia - a genuine popular revolution or a coupdetat?

Extracts from this document...


October Revolution in Russia - a genuine popular revolution or a coupdetat? A. View it as a mass movement Russia in 1910's - revolutionary situation Grievances of the people - real An overwhelming percentage of population participated. Various classes had their discontent and were ready to express it in this mass movement. a. peasants' discontent b. workers' discontent c. educated classes' discontent d. nobility's discontent e. army's discontent Revolutionary groups were active and emerged as powerful, with the mass behind them. The Bolsheviks provided leadership for the revolution. They had plans and party programmes - power to the people (simplified the idea of socialism) and their famous slogan: bread, land, peace - voiced the need of the people, really appealed to them and won the acquiescence of the populace and the armies. From February to October, there was boiling over of mass discontent. February - mass demonstration and raging through the streets; the government could not control the country. There was lawlessness, confusion, and violence. ...read more.


- decided the time was ripe because of the international war situation rather then the mass behaviour in Russia. 4. The Bolsheviks had only begun to be a majority in Soviets in August. They had not built up a dominant influence among the people, especially in the countryside. Even Lenin needed to take time to convince the Bolshevik leaders about the time for political takeover. 5. Post-1917 situation was a civil war - the Bolsheviks needed to impose and consolidate their authority in the country by force - reign of terror and the use of Cheka. - they had not gained popular support in October, at least not the kind of support in which the people genuinely identified their interests with the Bolshevik faith. - the civil war lasted for 2 years, could not be solely explained by the presence of foreign troops. - after they seized power, they cut opposition by banning political parties and imprison opponents. ------------------------- What is a coupdetat? ...read more.


- middle class still had hope to have a reform from above - armies still loyal to the Czar - revolutionary parties were weak The Czarist government tried to revitalize its rule by reforms but was insincere and thus failed. People discontent remained. Discontent accumulated and finally released in the First World War. Why 1917 revolution successful? Bolshevik's idea on the chance of a successful revolution: - Chaos in which only the party who know what they wanted would be the final victor. - First World War provided such a chance. (details on its effects on the ruling house) - Thus the time was ripe now, Nicholas II was forced to abdicate. But the revolution did not produce a democratic government as usually happened in other country because the middle class was weak and they were unprepared for it. So the Bolsheviks finally seized power as they had predicted in such a chaos. ----------- Russian Revolution in 1917 was the work of Lenin? Without Lenin, there would be no Bolshevik Revolution? It implies that the time was not ripe for revolution, the success of the Bolsheviks resulted from luck and opportunism of Lenin. ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * In June 1941, Stalin was taken completely by surprise by Operation Barbarossa. He appears to have taken a week to recover from the shock * Although Stalin was all-powerful, many of the peoples of the USSR hated him and were ready to welcome the Germans.

  2. The 1917 Revolution.

    As part of the deal Kerensky released Trotsky and other Bolshevik leaders from prison, and armed the workers. Kornilov's attempt to seize power fizzled out, as telegraph operators refused to send his orders, and railway workers controlled the vital communications.

  1. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    returned to Petrograd from exile. While he was away, Lenin had been adapting Marx's ideas to work specifically on Russia. He now believed that the February revolution had been an incomplete capitalist revolution, and that the weakness and isolation of the Russian bourgeoisie meant they would be unable to carry

  2. FRench revolution

    Before the enlightenment the French governmental organization was an absolute monarchy with feudal constitutional rights for the aristocracy and catholic clergy. In fact no one in France actually wanted a revolution in 1789, but throughout the 18th century there was a growth of spirit and this was referred to as the Enlightenment and was the start of the revolution.

  1. In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the ...

    This upheld equality - someone in some school would receive the same education as someone from another school. However, this also meant that there was no room for freedom of choice within the state system, or for freedom of thought or expression by pupils or staff; this was a betrayal

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    What the examples of Vikzhel and the Tula arms workers show is that in the absence of any strong sense of unifying national purpose such as there had been right after war was declared in 1914, it had become critically important for any aspiring Russian leader to appeal to the

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    effect on the war effort - showing their opposition to the war. Lenin used both the war and the failure of the Provisional government to his advantage by saying how he would stop the war and take over from the Provisional Government who didn't seem to be listening to the people.

  2. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    The people believed that the one to blame for Russia?s economical disaster was its corrupt and ineffective government. The people were enraged by the fact that Russia?s economy simply couldn?t keep up with the western economy. The foremost reason for civil discontent however, was the severe losses of military forces in war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work