• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Oliver Cromwell - Hero or Villain?

Extracts from this document...


The aim of this essay, is to answer the long-awaited question 'Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain? This question, is a hard one to answer. James Heath once said "His name and memory stink." In opposition, Samuel Pepys said "People look back and praise him." True? Or Not? This essay will argue Edmond Ludlow's words," How glorious, but then such betrayal!" Oliver Cromwell was neither a hero nor a villain. The evidence and opinions gathered will state, how he went from good to bad, and from bad to evil. Oliver Cromwell, was a puritan gentleman from Huntingdon. He was born on the 25th of April 1599, and brought up in a very wealthy family, and a high social class. Cromwell, was an MP for Huntingdon, from 1628-1629. He had no fighting experience then, and was very worried about the Roundhead army, at the battle of Edgehill. Cromwell then went home to Huntingdon, and began to train his own army. Cromwell was a magnificent soldier. He created a whole new army from scratch, and he trained his army, in a special and unique way. Cromwell would do anything to win his battles, and beat Prince Rupert and if it meant making a whole new army, than so be it. ...read more.


At the time, Cromwell felt that he was defending England's rights and interests. Cromwell also felt, that it was the right thing to do. I mean-all he had, was the authority of his army. Was Cromwell right to do this? Or was Charles I a Traitor and a Tyrant? The trial could also have been a farce, as some people thought. This was because some people thought that Oliver Cromwell had killed God's anointed one, as people believed very strongly in the Divine right of Kings. Oliver Cromwell also had his army sent out, to tell people to have him killed, and to support him, in all he did against Charles I. He made people fear him. Now, was that really the way, to gain support? Oliver Cromwell was moving out of Military stuff, and into Politics. Things were now becoming complicated, as England was now a republic. This meant that anyone could invade England anytime that they wanted. I think that Cromwell was going the wrong way because he was very good at military tactics, but those skills were not, and are not needed in the parliament, and it wasn't very useful either. Cromwell was also very involved in Ireland. ...read more.


And he also cancelled Christmas. Can you imagine living in those times, and how awful it must have been for them? Here, we come to the part where we decide what Oliver Cromwell was. Hero or Villain? I think that he was never anyone of those. I think that he was just doing what he believed in. If that meant making a few sacrifices, then so be it! I don't think that he killed one king, just to make another, but he just did what he felt he had to do. One thing which I agree on, is that he could have gone about it a different way. Also, I agree in one thing that he said, and also believed in. That was that "The end justifies the Means." What he meant by that, was that no matter what happens, something good always comes out at the end, and it's the end outcome that really matters. The words that I will leave you with, are the words of one Richard Baxter, a parliamentarian. We are not sure whether we can trust these words or not, as being a parliamentarian, he would have been a bit sympathetic to Cromwell, but it's quite reasonable. "No man was better and worse spoken of than he...he meant honestly...and was pious...till power corrupted him...he thinketh that the end being good and necessary, the necessary means cannot be bad..." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Did Oliver Cromwell achieve his objectives from 1642 to 1658?

    5 star(s)

    These again failed to help Cromwell achieve his objectives. After the failure of the Western Design the 11 Major Generals were appointed. In Cromwell's eyes the Major Generals had helped to initiate the reforms he desired. However they were far from the traditional government he had wanted.


    such kingdoms did contend with out much fall of blood, whose guiltless drops". He tells Canterbury to be careful because he doesn't want an illegal war. Henry takes this so seriously as he doesn't want his soldiers to lose their lives unnecessarily and doesn't want their lives on his conscience.

  1. History Independant study - Oliver Cromwell

    the divine right, however on the other hand Cromwell was a staunch believer that there was no divine right in existence and therefore it was not something he needed to consider. Likewise his role in the execution of Charles I could be seen as 'an act of regicide,'6 and therefore

  2. An unmitigated disaster. How valid is this assessment of Oliver Cromwells experiment with the ...

    However, Major General Goffe responds in a friendly manner, very different to being a military dictator, which they are regularly connected to, 'I dismissed him for the present, apprehending if I should have done otherwise, they would have made their advantage of it.' (Major-General William Goffe to Secretary Thurloe, 1656)

  1. How far does the evidence of the sources below suggest that Oliver Cromwell was ...

    'Godly zealots like Ireton and Cromwell had been keen to conclude a monarchical settlement...that godly zeal and godly zealots were turned against the King was due almost entirely to what Charles I did. His behaviour...drove men who were social and political conservatives to embark on an act of extreme political revolution'.

  2. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    and he played a decisive role in the 'revolution' of winter 1648-9 which saw the trial and execution of the King and the abolition of monarchy and the House of Lords.'-*4 Additionally, Cromwell's military standing gave him enhanced political power.

  1. Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution, c.1642 - c.1658 - Did Oliver Cromwell ...

    However, Catholics were most definitely not welcome and Cromwell went as far as to denounce Papists (and Cavaliers) as un-Christian and un-English-like. It is quite difficult to work out exactly where Cromwell stood socially. On one hand he was the radical looking for "the rule of saints", and on the

  2. Charlemagne Essay.

    This could demonstrate that army morale and effectiveness was in decline after 800. It is possible that continuous campaigning since 769 was taking its toll and that military service was overburdening free society, impairing economic life. This could explain increasing references to evasion of military service, complaints about unfair demands for service, and desertion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work