• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Opposition was the main problem facing Alexander III. How far do you agree with the statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Opposition was the main problem facing Alexander3. How far do you agree with the statement? Alexander3 inherited the Russian Empire in the moment when there was urge for changes. His legacy from his father was the inception of newly introduced liberal movements. Even though Alexander was reactionary, it was mainly because he did not want to follow his fathers footsteps who was assassinated by nihilist group ?Peoples Will?, he couldn?t stop spread of so called ?Westerners? and radicals. It was crucial for Alexander to preserve his power as an autocrat, which meant that there were no room for opposition that could jeopardise his reign. But at that point he could still hold his control over Russia and opposition was too weak and divided to challenge the Tsar, at that time Empire faced more economical and social problems that Tsar needed to solve. As a child Alexander had Pobedonoscev as his tutor who was Tsars chief minister and leading official of the State Church. He was remarkable by his conservative views, being part of Slavophiles movement. It was easy for him to influence Alexanders views far before he became Tsar and even after his influence kept pursuing the young Tsar. Because of Pobedonoscevs doctrines Alexander believed in order for Russia to modernise it needs to follow old traditions, so he will be safe from repeating his fathers fate. ...read more.

Middle

The other problem that faced Tsar was extremist ?Peoples will?, so the way that Alexander replied to that is creating with the government Stature of State Security. There were special government courts to deal with the political rivals. Their power gave them a possibility to arrest the political enemies without a trial and execute them or exile them to Siberia. Thousands were repressed and mainly they did maintain political stability and destroyed ?Peoples Will?. Even though the aim was achieved and the main threat facing the Tsar did not exist anymore, they stayed until the end of monarchy in 1917. Tsar felt that there was the rapid spread of radical and liberal movements and it created another problem for him in his view. So he took the control of the press, its freedom was restricted. Fourteen major newspapers were banned from 1882-9 for displaying liberal ideas. Okhrana the secret police that Tsar created to do the practical job in preserving the stability also censored all foreign material that Russia imported. They made sure that such political ideologies as democracy and parliamentary government did not reach citizens mind. Even though Alexander thought that he destroyed extremist ?Peoples Will? there was a strong underground movement existing still. ...read more.

Conclusion

The fact that they needed to pay incentives to the government, which were harsh and that majority of Russian land did not give harvest yearly proves the economical instability. Workers had grim conditions and industries were only developed in Urals and textiles in main city. The Tsar did not cope with those main problems because it was important and possible for Russia to maintain same results as Germany and Austro-Hungary. But Tsar was focused on repressions and he thought it was his main problem. He did achieve short-term success in destroying the opposition , but long term effects were more horrifying. The spread of ideas did not stop and the dissatisfaction of the people grew which made his son Nicholas to face it. Also for instance, his repression of Jewish people led to their escape from Russia and create Jewish organisation the Bund, which joined Bolsheviks and made them more powerful. Arresting Lenin and sending him to Siberia for fourteen months made Ulyanov find a lot of supporters and start to create a plot of how to destroy monarchy. Femines and land issue seemed like a bomb that soon would explode, people did tolerate Tsar but to certain extent when they can at least feed their family. Focusing on opposition made Tsar forgetting about other issues in Russia and even though he thought that it was the main problem facing Tsardom he was mistaken. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    Therefore he was forced to rely heavily on the civil service to implement his policies, and while Mussolini made thousands of policies and he was extremely disorganised. Meanwhile the non fascist civil service could use their own spin on policy and influence it, and the system was so corrupt that they could get away with it very easily.

  2. To What Extent Were the Reforms of Alexander II Intended to Preserve and Strengthen ...

    But he went ahead with the reforms at the risk of being challenged by new schools of thought that would arise from it, as he deemed it the best thing for Russia. After the humiliation of the Crimean War, Alexander saw it best to reform the military.

  1. How well does Alexander II deserve his reputation as The Tsar Liberator(TM)?

    These historians, however have obviously glossed over the actual effects of Emancipation. Although appearing very generous, peasants actually had to buy land they had previously considered their own and overall lost 20-40% of land as 'cut-offs.' Peasants often lost rights to woods; commons now declared Lord's private property and domestic serfs were not given any land.

  2. To what extent was Alexander III reign reactionary?

    As the Tsars chief minister and head of the church Pobodonostsev held enormous power, he was the organiser of the Tsars manifesto; it declared that absolute political power was held by the Tsar. The immediate task of the Tsars new government was to destroy the terrorist group The Peoples Will;

  1. How far did Alexander III successfully solve the problems he faced in 1881, by ...

    He had to bring the country to a stable state. Besides putting an end to the revolutionaries, Alexander III took numerous steps in order to aim to restore Russia like it was before to its pre-situation. In 1884, he established a new University Statue.

  2. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    Additionally, only 22 per cent of peasants took control of their own land through the reforms . However on the other, the moving of 3.5 million peasants to Siberia, 27 per cent of peasants leaving communes, the double in sales of machinery, and an increase in yield of two thirds,

  1. Was Alexander II more successful than Alexander III in coping with the problems ...

    Universal conscription was eventually introduced in 1874. This pointed the way to a large scale armed force with six year service and a long length of time in reserve this replaced the outdated old-fashioned system which had basically seen a serf army.

  2. How effectively did Alexander II cope with the problems he faced on his succession?

    By reducing the conscription period to 15 years in a set of reforms laid out in 1875, he reduced costs and complacency of the conscripts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work