• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is Arrian's praise of Alexander's leadership justified?

Extracts from this document...


"Noble indeed was his power of inspiring his men, of filling them with confidence and in a moment of danger, of sweeping away their fear by the spectacle of his own fearlessness" (Arrian, Anabasis 7.29) To what extent is Arrian's praise of Alexander's leadership justified? Having studied Alexander's reign and scrutinised the various great successes he achieved in his short life as king, his "power of inspiring his men" becomes blatently obvious. Thus, even on the rare occasion that Alexander deserves to be criticised there is no doubt that the positive aspects of his leadership greatly outweigh the negative, making Arrian's praise of Alexander's leadership truly justified. Perhaps, it is more accurate to note that Alexander may not have been the most politically astute or modest of men, but irrespective of this the leadership skills he displayed were truly impeccable. Whilst sharing in all the dangers his army endured throughout the eight difficult years of battles, Alexander continually demonstrated sheer military genius, speed and mobility. Arrian's praise of Alexander is all the more tangible and acceptable due to the fact that he was writing almost four hundred years after Alexander's death therefore eliminating any possibility of sycophancy or romanticism. Arrian's 'Campaigns of Alexander' are thought to be the most accurate and reliable account, heightened by the fact that he actually names his sources, who were both contemporaries of Alexander. Both Ptolemy and Aristobulus actually accompanied Alexander, and since Ptolemy was a king himself, it would have been disgraceful for him to lie. Arrian is also quick to criticise Alexander when it is deserved, this is indicated by the disgust that he felt at the "servile behaviour" that Alexander allowed many of his followers to indulge in. This not only indicates how impartial and genuine Arrian is also greatly strengthens the reliability his opinion, in turn helping to justify the praise he adorns upon Alexander. ...read more.


The marriage of the men at Susa in 324 BC, whereby, "the king was married just as the others were" (Arrian) not only highlights Alexander's ability to lead by example, but also his ability as a great leader to be careful not to disengage himself from his troops, proving that Alexander was capable of simply enjoying "the companionship of his men". Arrian points out how "Alexander was always capable of putting himself on an equal footing of equality and comradeship as his subordinates." It is consequently irrelevant whether or not Alexander led his men by his own example simply to enhance his men's ability to succeed militarily in his own "passion for glory", or whether in fact he was a simply a humble man who felt he was only as good as his soldiers could be. Irrespective, this strategy clearly highlights Alexander's military genius. Burn highlights that "no soldier in history is more undisputedly "great" than Alexander". His genius is apparent in every aspect of warfare and expedition within the eight years, Arrian comments on "his ability to seize the moment for a swift blow, before his enemy had any suspicions of what was coming was beyond praise". This technique of military genius is particularly highlighted at the Battle of the Hydaspes River 326. Alexander couldn't cross the swollen river directly as the elephants would have made his horses go mad, and so Alexander "cunningly created many false alarms until Porus was lulled into a sense of security, under the cover of darkness Alexander led a selected force...across the river." (Bradley) This exceptional ability to defeat the formidable army of King Porus in such a cunning way would have greatly motivated Alexander's army, giving them even greater faith in their leader and in turn offering justification to Arrian's appraisal of Alexander. It is understandable that when Alexander was faced with opposition or a serious threat he retaliated ruthlessly, as an absolute king he simply could not afford to tolerate opposition to his political agenda and advances, and so he had to ensure he was even more brutal than his opponents. ...read more.


Alexander is, on the other hand renowned and recalled as "Alexander the Great", as a man of great generosity and faith, as a great warrior and fighter, and most importantly as a great leader of men. The overlying quality that proves just how impeccable Alexander's leadership skills were, and accordingly justifies Arrian's expression of "ungrudging admiration" towards him, is in fact a characteristic shared by both these men, their honesty. Alexander in all his undertakings and enterprises as leader of the Hellespont was continually honest and truthful to his men, praising and rewarding them when he felt due, and scolding them when deserved. After the armies mutiny Alexander made his disappointment blatantly obvious, "when I lead you on a new venture you no longer follow me with your old spirit.,"(Arrian) Not only was Alexander always honest about his own feelings towards his men he also made no secret of the disgust he felt for himself after the murder of Cleitus, taking to his bed for three days with neither food nor drink. This display of emotion on Alexander's part proves that as a successful leader of an army Alexander valued the qualities of honesty and truth. The very fact that Arrian "admittedly, found fault with some of the things Alexander did" indicates the honesty he too maintained, and proves that his appraisal of Alexander's leadership is an honest reflection of his wish "to tell the truth as I saw it". A simple comparison of Alexander's leadership skills to those of all the other famous leaders of the world, both classical and modern, is enough to justify Arrian's appraisal and proves undoubtedly that "never in the world was there another one like him"(Arrian) and that Alexander, in the words of his very own men truly was "Alexandros Aniketos" - invincible Alexander. Leaders who now in the modern world are respected and regarded as exceptional military leaders in their own right, such as Napoleon and Caesar viewed Alexander as the bench mark in terms leadership success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level William Golding section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level William Golding essays

  1. The Indian Mutiny

    They also abolished Sati, the practice of burning a Hindu widow on her husband's pyre. The EIC's involvement in ancient Indian traditions and practices became too much for the Indian people and it became a fight for dignity and freedom.

  2. Why Was King Alfred So Great?

    In addition to this he imported many top scholars such as Asser of South Wales and John the Saxon of Europe. This was successful in increasing and spreading literacy as well as increasing numbers of educated men such as historians and clergymen which aided the Anglo-Saxon England culturally.

  1. To what extent was Napoleon a Dictator

    The Prefect system was also set up in 1800, under the new department system. They were appointed by Napoleon and therefore solely accountable to him. They collected taxes and enforced conscription, as well as the spreading of propaganda. The prefects could also place people under house arrest if they did

  2. In this essay, I shall use primary sources to measure the short term significance ...

    and amendment by Jefferson's Cabinet and several leading scientists, the same men who later taught Lewis about their subjects so that he could better observe and record what he came across on the Expedition. Again the word 'secrecy 'is used because although there is public knowledge about exploration of the

  1. The cult of Stalin and the purges of the 1930(TM)s were two aspects of ...

    To destabilize this belief Stalin portrayed Trotsky as the culprit, giving him the pretext to introduce a series of anti-terrorist measures and to purge the party of so-called Trotskyites and Zinovievites, including Gregory Zinoviev himself, Lev Kamenev and 14 other party members, who were arrested by Genrikh Yagoda the Head

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    The relationship between the emperor and the Knights continued to deteriorate to the extent of the promotion of Christians to the east. Crusaders suspected that the Byzantine conductors intentionally lured them into ambushes. The army was completely unprepared for the sudden attacks of the enemy's cavalry, who manage to escape, Before Knight's heavy cavalry rushed in pursuit.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    Ultimately, the growth of the nationalist movement in India was built upon by Gandhi in the way that he commanded much publicity as a figurehead of the movement. However his Satyagraha campaign and attitude infuriated many, and the British government?s intransigence when faced with his campaigns, could have in fact delayed the granting of independence.

  2. To What Extent Was Russia Modernised During the Personal Reign of Peter the Great? ...

    of St Petersburg, churches were based upon ones in London and the town houses Peter wanted his nobility to build were based upon merchant houses Peter had seen on his travels in Amsterdam. Peter bought in the Italian architect Domenico Trezzini who had great experience in building on marsh land which St Petersburg was built upon.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work