• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the distinctive features of the major political groups vying for power in Russia in 1917 - What was it about the Bolsheviks which enabled them to take power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the distinctive features of the major political groups vying for power in Russia in 1917. What was it about the Bolsheviks which enabled them to take power? Scope This essay will detail the major political groups during the first and second revolutions of 1917 and their various ideas and approaches and will demonstrate why it was the Bolsheviks who ultimately gained power over the others. I will not analyse how the Bolsheviks consolidated their power after although it is none-the-less important. Introduction 1917 was a year of immense upheaval in Russian Politics and History. It saw the embryonic stages of a new system of government that the world had never before seen, and would ultimately have a large impact on world events and politics. It is necessary to chronicle, briefly, the events of the early part of the year to set the basis for the essay. January and February saw waves of industrial unrest across Russia, particularly in cities such as the then-capital Petrograd. Around 670,000 workersi went on strike across Russia, with around 80-100,000 in Petrograd alone, 15,000 coming from the Putilov Factory. To make matters worse bread shortages began on February 19, while the Petrograd garrison, dispatched to quash the strikes, later mutinied and joined the cause of the workers. In early March, Csar Nicholas II, seeing that his control over the army and therefore the country had effectively been compromised, abdicated. His son Alexei and then brother Mikhail would not take the crown so the Romanov dynasty effectively ended. ...read more.

Middle

It could be argued that this was reinforced by the attempted revolution in 1905 that showed to the SRs but also to the Bolsheviks under Lenin that this was indeed possible - "a conscious minority who would remould the world"xi. Why the Bolsheviks? I believe the Bolsheviks came to power in October 1917 because of a complex relationship of reasons that are all interrelated. The first major reason lies in Policies and political ambition of the Bolsheviks. I feel they had very clear ideas. Primarily it was the Bolsheviks' attitude to the provisional government and to the Soviets, particularly those of Petrograd and Moscow that allowed them the means to take power. They believed in "no support to the Provisional Government"xii and that all power should be transferred to the soviets, (despite their domination by the SRs and Mensheviks), characterised in their Revolutionary slogan 'All power to the soviets'. By seizing power of the Soviets from the Mensheviks and SRs they would possess an easy route to power as the Petrograd soviet by this stage controlled the armed forces of Petrograd allowing armed revolution against the Provisional Government. The opposite view was held by the SRs and especially the Mensheviks who I think, supported by the arguments of Kochan (1972) underrated the potential power that the soviets could possess. They failed to recognise that the Bolsheviks would use the soviets to their own ends and that the Bolshevik slogan of 'All power to the soviets' was in fact a means to gain support (away from the provisional government) ...read more.

Conclusion

lead to the Bolsheviks having an advantage over the other parties. In addition their clearly defined policies such as transferring power to the soviets appeared to "offer the prospect of a break with old patterns of authority"xviii thus their support, it can be argued, was based on the fact they were offering something new to the political arena which coincided perfectly with the aims of the social movementsxix and the needs of the people - summed up as 'Peace Bread and Land'. The Bolsheviks were also in the right place at the right time - their skill in using events such as the Kornilov attempted coup to gain support for their party was instrumental in gaining support for, or indifference to, their takeover. Thirdly Lenin's skill as a leader and tactician with forward thinking, particularly in the use of the soviets to gain power, was decisive. He advocated 'All power to the soviets' at a time when the Mensheviks and SRs dominated them, but safe in the knowledge that the Bolsheviks could gain a majority in the soviets in the long term. Also the formation of the Military Revolutionary Council under the guise of resisting right wing coups but then using them as an utterly loyal means to take power was in my opinion an extremely clever move. Finally, the following quote summarises my argument that it was a combination of factors that allowed the Bolsheviks to take power: "October was accomplished...by the actions of a definite party but it was...prepared by all the unfolding events hitherto... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. why did revolution in russia break out in 1917

    By 1914, Russia had a reputation of having the largest gold reserve in Europe. However, the war cost Russia a lot during the time of war which led to increased taxation among the Russians and heavy borrowing from abroad.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Six weeks before the insurrection itself, the Bolsheviks won a majority on the Petrograd Soviet. The Bolshevik share of the seats on the Moscow ward councils rose from 11% in July to 51% in October. If the payoff was substantial among the population in general,it was even higher among the

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Many died from exhaustion. Altogether at least 7,000,000 people disappeared in the Purges, perhaps twice or even three times that number. * Stalin forced some ethnic groups to move from their homelands to Siberia. Whole populations were transported from southern Russia to the east.

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    Firstly the war and all of its major problems brought about the collapse of Tsarism. If the Bolsheviks were trying to gain support and ultimately force a revolution during the Tsarist regime they would have been severely punished. Political freedom was not allowed.

  1. Assess the reasons why the Russian Revolution of 1917 ended in victory for the ...

    It was just that in comparison with the provisional government or the White army, they would rather preferred the Bolsheviks because other parties failed to deliver the fundamental issues on peace, land and bread. Consequently, the Bolsheviks was able to able to gain the public supports as they reflected the radical demands of the public.

  2. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    Many of these countries still hold on to the Communist way. This shows how important Lenin?s introduction of Marxism-Leninism was to Russia and the entire world. The Bolshevik Party was the party of whom Lenin was the leader. They split away from the Mensheviks during Lenin?s first appearance in 1903.

  1. Why did the Tsar lose power in 1917?

    By 1916 the Tsar had lost quite a lot of support because of the mistakes he had made during the period. Nicolas should not have got Russia involved in the war; they couldn?t afford it, the military programme was not ready and he was related to the leader in Germany so there was no need for full mobilisation.

  2. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    After the events of the ?July Days? Kerensky made an attempt to assert control over events and appointed Kornilov as Commander in Chief to reassert discipline into the army. This measure was too reactionary for the Mensheviks and social revolutionaries who were now part of the government, but Kornilov was jailed as a hero by the right.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work