• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the main features of Russian nuclear strategy in the post-Cold War era

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the main features of Russian nuclear strategy in the post-Cold War era The evolution of present Russian nuclear strategy can be traced through the post- World War II epoch of Soviet- U.S. nuclear arms race. According to Greg Sheridan we can find ourselves in a new era of international relations- the post-Cold War era. This new period is characterised by bilateral efforts and disarmament agreements (for example the START treaties) and 'strategic drift and entropy' (Sheridan, 2002: 27) between the United States and Russia. The collapse of the Soviet Union had caused a 'global transformation and shift in power' (Hartle & Sikonen, 1991: 215) and as a result the new, democratic Russian Federation emerged in 1991. Although this new state is a regional superpower, it is only a great power in the multipolar contemporary international system, but it is still regarded by United States as the only compatible country which could as its adversary cause the unaccepted damage in a single-large scale nuclear attack (Wallander, 2002: 25). The future relationship between these nuclear superpowers will play the key-role in international relations, especially in the spheres of international security, crisis management, nuclear strategy and maintenance of global stability. It is necessary that in today's era of 'global insecurity' (Podvig, 2000: 12) Russian Federation and the United States join hands and build the mutual confidence, in order to effectively deal with numerous issues such as the arms control, further nuclear disarmament, nuclear non-proliferation, post-Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) ...read more.

Middle

Treaty. Despite much criticism it receives, START-II Treaty overall contributes to strategic stability and reduces both countries' capabilities to make explicitly damaging counter-force nuclear strike. (Berry, 1987: 37). It also strengthens the nuclear non-proliferation regime, reduces the risk of accidental nuclear conflict and aids in confidence building in Russo-American relationship. For example, the Black Brant XII incident occurred in 1995, where Norwegian-U.S. joint research rocket was mistaken by Russia as a nuclear attack. Yeltsin did not act immediately, primarily because Russia was guaranteed some form of partnership and security by START Treaties and it felt confident in its relationship to Washington. Thus the retaliatory counter-attack was not carried out, and the breakout of the accidental nuclear war was avoided (Dvorkin 1999: 2). The issue of Russian New Military Doctrine followed START-II Treaty in the same year (1993). It concentrated more on internal than external threats to Federation's security. The concept 'Kontzeptzia' and the main tenants 'Osnovnye Polozhena' gave priority to economic progress and elaborated national interests of Russia as regional superpower, great power and nuclear superpower (Dvorkin, 1999: 5). This doctrine allowed Russia to use nuclear weapons first in an attack by a nuclear weapon state and any of its allies, but stressed the internal threats as the major threats to national security. Russian New Military Doctrine was the expansion of its post-Cold War nuclear strategy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite the claims by Russian military and political leadership that American NMD is currently not technically possible, there is a difference between said and done. Russian nuclear strategy took another turn, and instead of mutual efforts towards nuclear disarmament, Russia is now working towards modernisation of its nuclear capabilities and nuclear weapons. There is a current deadlock on US-Russian agreements in terms of further nuclear disarmament. These nuclear giants are still operating within the old army control negotiations framework, which provides few incentives for solving the problems that exist today. Although Russian nuclear strategy in the post-Cold War era was evolving through mutual treaties to build-up more confidence with United States, the underlying political issues did not resolve the controversies. The failure of United States and Russia to make a better progress towards nuclear disarmament and end nuclear testing, cleared the ground for India and Pakistan to engage in a new nuclear arms race (Hartle & Sikonen, 1991:101). Many analysts urge all nuclear countries, especially Russia and United States to collaborate towards a further nuclear disarmament, better arms control and prevent international terrorist organizations to reach nuclear materials. Russian post-Cold War nuclear strategy contributed to overall reduction of nuclear weapons (from 60.000 to 35.000) (Dvorkin, 1999: 17), however the risk of accidental nuclear war is still real and the threat of nuclear proliferation is greater than ever. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the Cold War start

    The Soviet fear was amplified by their concerns over the use of the bomb due to the fact that America had now candidly expressed their anti-communist opinions, and were afraid that it would be used '... for the purpose of achieving its Imperialist goals from a position of strength in

  2. What were the Main Causes of the Cold War? and Which of these Causes ...

    Once the Russian Communist regime was in power then ideologically differences were bound to appear but it didn't really matter until 1941, as America was isolationist. When Japan attacked American soil, the conflict of ideologies between the two superpowers could be seen as a troubling and dangerous post-war focus but

  1. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    The 1946 'Iran crisis' marks yet another catastrophic misjudgement between the two sides. As already established, post World War II Russia was in a state of ruin, its economy in tatters. Stalin's aim was to rebuild the Soviet Union through a rapid plan of industrialisation but he could not do this completely alone.

  2. Japan: Post-Occupation Era 1952-80

    men who could make the system run. In fact, most experienced bureaucrats who wanted to go further in their careers would join the LDP. The LDP emphases were strengthening the economy, improving people's livelihood and re-establishing Japan in the eyes of the world, etc. The LDP believed in free enterprises and vowed??

  1. When and Why Did the Cold War Start? Was any Individual or Power the ...

    'New Evidence on the Soviet Rejection of the Marshall Plan 1947: Two Reports' 1994] The Marshall plan was rejected by Stalin as it went against the Potsdam conference in July 1945 which was implemented so that Germany would remain militarily and economically weak a requirement on which Stalin was not prepared to negotiate: '(b)

  2. To what extent was the nuclear arms race a more stabilising factor in the ...

    If the opposition was not backing down it would lead to two options, to either reveal the false threats or go to war.

  1. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    * West weren?t prepared to agree to this, but were willing to look at arms limitations * Eisenhower suggested ?open skies? to verify arms agreements, Khrushchev refused this offer. * Conclusion: Both sides went in with high hopes, however the only agreement to come out of the summit was the cultural exchange of scientists, musicians and artists.

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    There is another view by the Constructivists which argues that individuals are influential in shaping events in international systems. The Constructivists approach, influenced by the written works of Alexander Wendt (1958?) argues (Wendt, 1992) argues that unlike the ways in which theoretical explanations by realist and liberalist were incapable of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work