• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Peaceful Coexistence was a period of relative freedom from tension, rather than one of universal agreement." To what extend do you agree with this assertion?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Name: Arie Adam Form: L6N Essay Question: "Peaceful Coexistence was a period of relative freedom from tension, rather than one of universal agreement." To what extend do you agree with this assertion? In the late 1950s, both the USSR and the USA opened their windows to dialogue and 'peaceful coexistence'. The new policy was introduced by Khrushchev, and was soon welcomed by the United States. Attempts to establish a dialogue between the superpowers led to what has been termed a 'thaw' in Cold War relations. However, many underlined tensions between the two superpowers still existed. They both continued to believe that the other side could never be trusted and had strong suspicions about each other's moves. Their attempts to communicate often ended in creating new 'frosts' between them; something that made universal agreement almost impossible. From the early 1950s the governments of the USA and the USSR were facing he same pressures, pushing them towards reaching an accommodation with each other. These were economic pressures and the fear of nuclear war. Both countries were trying to answer the question: How to reduce military spending to free resources for other sectors of the economy? Domestic reforms and living standards were held back by pouring money into an unproductive military sector. ...read more.

Middle

This was dramatically expressed in the Domino Theory of April 1954: 'you have a row of dominoes set up and you knock over the first one...". However, the successful test of the first Soviet H-bomb in August 1953, a peace settlement in Indochina in July 1954 and Churchill's continued insistence encouraged Eisenhower to explore peaceful coexistence. Eisenhower had spoken of the need for Soviet deeds not words and in April 1955 the Soviet Union proposed a formal peace treaty with Austria. This was successful and led to full independence for Austria on 15th May 1955. In a further success of peaceful coexistence Khrushchev and Bulganin visited Yugoslavia in May 1955, and despite a very cold reception endorsed Tito's leadership and ended years of hostility. By spring 1955 peaceful coexistence had significantly reduced East-West tension and the Soviet Union proposed a summit. The Geneva Summit of June 1955 was the first meeting of Allied leaders since Potsdam. The key issue for the Soviet Union and the ultimate test of peaceful coexistence was the future of Germany. Marshall Aid had revitalised West Berlin and West Germany had been rearmed and admitted to NATO in May 1955. However, the West refused Soviet requests for the recognition of East Germany and rejected proposals for a unified but disarmed Germany. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Khrushchev blundered at a press conference when he boasted, 'We will bury you'. He was speaking in the context of economic competition and probably being a little sarcastic, but his words rekindled the US sense of threat. During the following years, tensions increased between China and the Soviet Union, as Mao Zeodong was increasingly critical of peaceful coexistence. In July 1960 the dispute with China burst into the open as Khrushchev condemned Chinese communism following Mao Zedong's complaint that 'peaceful coexistence was a bourgeois pacific concept'. Khrushchev never trusted China, and in a bizarre adoption of US rhetoric accused Chinese of a 'desire to rule the world'. In my opinion, agreement between the superpowers was not possible during the Late 1950s. Although they both made efforts to achieve peaceful coexistence, the fear of each other did not let then succeed. Also, the advance of communism in China threatened the United States and events in Korea and Vietnam justified the 'Domino Theory'. This was made worst by Mao's criticism of peaceful coexistence. The Soviet Union was willing to loosen up its foreign policy in Eastern Europe. Yet, this was limited as shown in the events in Poland and USSR's attitude towards the Hungarian Rising in 1956. I believe that peaceful coexistence was a period of relative freedom from tension, however not a universal agreement. The West lost a great opportunity to end the War! 4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    This open engagement in what Marx called exploitation, would never have been allowed in Maoist China. In education, only 80,000 out of one billion peop from coursework.info le received university education, Mao had decided the future of young intellectuals and made sure they would never become to powerful, they were

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    After the First World War there was a genuine desire for peace. * The League was successful in the 1920s in settling disputes between countries like Finland and Sweden over the Aaland Islands and Greece and Bulgaria over a border dispute.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    As word spread across the country, the stricken look on people's faces told those who had not yet heard the news the awful dimensions of what had happened. "He was the only president I ever knew," one woman said. In London, Churchill declared that he felt as if he had suffered a physical blow.

  2. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    * They argue that the NEP would not have produced a Russia capable of defeating the Nazis, or an industrial giant capable of putting a man into space. The deaths and famines were unfortunate, but were necessary for the greater good of society.

  1. Is the Nuclear Family a universal social unit?

    found in 1910> The Kibbutz settled in Israel and lived as one big extended family, they all lived in one place and shared everything. They were quite poor because they believed everything should be shared, so they didn't end up with much money.

  2. Why did communism collapse in Eastern Europe?

    The secrecy and lies undermined efficiency, isolated individuals and eroded the morale of society. This was compounded by the fact that, due to Western influences, the public in the communist countries were beginning to realise their predicament and their backwardness.

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    But before these reach any conclusions, in 1989 communism collapsed in Eastern Europe. Why was 1989 the 'year of miracles'? In 1989, the Communist bloc of Eastern European countries which had seemed so solid crumbled in the space of a few months, and with hardly any bloodshed.

  2. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    had been, and these hopes were made true by the new policy of ?Peaceful Coexistence?. As mentioned above, this policy was first mentioned by Malenkov and then put into action by Khrushchev when he assumed leadership of the Soviet Union.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work