• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Post-war Soviet claims of being an ideological role model for a communist and third world countries were challenged in both Europe and elsewhere.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Shehtaaz Zaman September 28, 2003 IB SL History per. 5 Post-war Soviet claims of being an ideological role model for a communist and third world countries were challenged in both Europe and elsewhere. Citing examples from two regions, analyze: a.) The nature of the challenge b.) The Soviet response and c.) The reaction of the western powers. Arguably the most impressive demonstrations of US military and foreign policy is the containment of Soviet hegemony in the Post-War era. Upon the conclusion of the Second World War, both superpowers emerged due to the amount of influence each country had over certain areas of Europe. Thus, surfaced the Cold War, the struggle for ideological, economic and military supremacy and global influence between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, constantly battling for the expansion of their own spheres of influence. However, challenges to Soviet hegemony did not just come from the United States of America; it also came from the Eastern European satellite states and from the People's Republic of China. During the post-war era, Eastern Europe could be elucidated as two distinct definitions. Eastern Europe could be referred to as any part of the European continent lying on the Soviet side of the Iron Curtain, including European countries which had been integrated into the USSR and those which had not. ...read more.

Middle

Immediately, a conflict between ideologies is evident, as Mao believed in a rural-based revolution, while Lenin and the Soviets believed in an urban-based revolution. At the time when Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto, Europe had already experienced the Industrial revolution, and he predicted that the industrial workers would therefore lead the communist revolution. This doctrine was enthusiastically adopted by the Soviet Union. In Asia, however, the story was different. At the end of the Second World War, except for Japan, Australia and New Zealand, none of the developing countries had fully experience an industrial revolution. These countries therefore lacked an industrial proletariat to spearhead communist revolution. Mao Tze-Tung argued that the communist revolution in developing societies would have to be led by the peasants. These differences in approaches to bringing forth a proletarian revolution were also reflected in the domestic economic policies pursued by each of these countries. In the USSR, industrial development was assigned supremacy over all other sectors in the economy. In China, it was the agrarian revolution which was emphasized and pursued. "By application the laws of dialectical avarice to the Communist Party itself, Mao believed that the party was a ''unity of opposites'' between the leading proletarian Marxist-Leninist-Maoist line and party leadership on the one hand, and on the other, erroneous lines and thinking which ultimately reflect other class outlooks. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1978, due to Western influence and its own decisions, China introduced 'Market Socialism', reducing the Communist Party's control over the economy. This marked the pinnacle of abandonment of the USSR on the PRC's part, and the emergence of a new China closely tied with the west through increasing levels of trade and investment. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 also marked a turning point in Sino-Soviet relations. The Russian Federation which emerged out of the ashes of the USSR became increasingly preoccupied with domestic economic and political adjustment. It also marked the beginning of a new relationship between the PRC and the Russian Federation, vastly reducing the ideological hostility between the two countries. The short-term success of Yugoslavia was evident, as the country succeeded in carving out its own niche in the geopolitical spectrum of Eastern Europe. However, due to ethnic conflict within Yugoslavia led to the total collapse of the nation during the late 1990's in response to the collapse of the Soviet Union. Yugoslavia has ceased to exist in its former form, while the PRC has flourished, and is on its way to becoming an economic superpower. Both countries were successful to certain extent, as both were able to successfully employ their own form of totalitarian socialism differentiating from the Moscow model. The collapse of the East bloc and the emergence of a new China demonstrate the failure of the Moscow model and the Soviet's ability to contain these alternate forms of communism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent is the oil crisis of 1973 a turning point in postwar ...

    5 star(s)

    to order Israel to withdraw from Arab territories occupied during the Six Day War-- the OPEC nations ordered an embargo on the shipment of oil to US, Japan and Western Europe. The cut in output allowed OPEC nations to force the price of crude oil up fivefold in dollar terms

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Khrushchev demanded an apology and when Eisenhower refused. Khrushchev used this as an excuse to storm out of the meeting and returned to Moscow. * A proposed visit by Eisenhower to Moscow was immediately cancelled. That would have been the first time that a US president had visited the Soviet Union.

  1. How far sas the Sino-Soviet Split of the late 1960s the result of ideological ...

    casualties suggesting the Chinese had attacked first, but also demonstrated the impact of the two leaders' personalities upon Sino-Soviet relations. In 1964 the USSR had agreed to allow the Damansky Island to be governed by the Chinese, but Khrushchev was offended by Mao's boasts that the island was the first

  2. The Sino-Soviet Split

    This led to the Chinese rejection of rapprochement, and their subsequent attempts to "persuade"14 the Soviets to abandon this approach for the time being. Taking new leadership in the socialist camp, the Chinese actually offered advice to the Kremlin, influencing "both their decision not to intervene in Poland, and their

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    in person to Stalin: There can be no Anglo-American "second front" in Europe in 1942, as FDR had unwisely promised. He cites military unreadiness to launch an invasion by September, the last month of favorable weather. He proposes landings in North Africa and continued saturation bombing of Germany as a

  2. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    The other side of using police power on public opinion was the "organizing of enthusiasm," which could be thought of as: Propaganda tries to force a doctrine on the whole people; the organization embraces within its scope only those who do not threaten on psychological grounds to become a brake on the further dissemination of the idea.

  1. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    The individual commune was placed in control of all the means of production and was to operate as the sole accounting unit; it was subdivided into production brigades (generally coterminous with traditional villages) and production teams. Each commune was planned as a self-supporting community for agriculture, small-scale local industry (for

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    According to this view-based in large part on the rhetoric of Stalin and Lenin-world revolution constituted the sole priority of Soviet policy. Even the appearance of accommodation was a Soviet design to soften up capitalist states for eventual confrontation. As defined, admittedly in oversimplified fashion, by George Kennan in his

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work