• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Problems with Nazi Support

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using your own knowledge and the evidence of the sources identify the problems we face when looking to identify Nazi support in the period up to 1933. In the 1932 Reichstag elections, the NSDAP became Germany's largest political party with approximately 37% of the total electoral vote. In contrast to the relatively small party of 1928, this was a dramatic rise in party popularity. What is even more interesting is how Hitler and the NSDAP did not usurp power in a military sense. Instead, Hitler was voted into power by millions of unsuspecting citizens from a range of sociological, economical and ideological backgrounds. However, due to this new consensus among modern historians (post -1980), the stress on the individual as oppose to the class has led to a more complex understanding of who essentially favoured the Nazi party; deeming it even harder to identify empirical evidence from sources. Initially, before 1928, the NSDAP had failed to make a significant impact in German politics and they were merely a group with little popular support. ...read more.

Middle

However, Childer does acknowledge that the Nazi Party was a Volkspartei (People's Party) whose levels of support were actually from a "broad range of social groups". In addition, Childer argues that when analysing this ambiguity, it is important to contextualise the provenance of the election polls and "the specific grievances of those who [chose] the NSDAP to speak for them". For example, it is important to contextualise the extent of support acquired from the middle classes under the 2nd Reich, contrasting with the support from the new middle classes after the election. Dick Geary in his book entitled "Who Voted for the Nazis?" somewhat opposes the view of Childer, who basically argues that the timing of when a specific poll was made is arbitrary because of the lack of reliability in studying percentages. Hence, this is why many believe that modern opinion polls are necessary in the search for definitive evidence on the subject. Geary explains how in a particular county 28% of the artisans voted for Nazis. ...read more.

Conclusion

This severe lack of genuine support for the Nazis even resounds in the opposition to the Hitler Youth; namely the Navajos, Pirates and the Black gang, who would attack anyone in the Hitler Youth because of their following of the Nazi regime. In the last twenty years, a number of problems have been countered when analysing the statistical methodology and sources of the Nazi era. This has inevitably given birth to the complex views proposed by Falter and Brustein, who posit that German workers were far more attracted to the Nazis than many have argued in the past. However, one fundamental issue that cannot be solved is the difficulty in measuring the honest thoughts of the German public and whether or not the lack of any pre-existing loyalties (political or religious) aided the Nazis significantly. Having said this, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence which still stresses that the Mittelstand and the Protestant communities voted disproportionately in favour of the Nazis more so than any other class. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    that the process of surivival of the fittest by natural selection should be artificially speeded up by the government, for example by killing 'incurables' and various 'undesirables'.?He had swallowed various (origianally Roman Catholic) conspiracy theories lock, stock and barrel about alleged Jewish and Masonic plans for world domination.?Despite the name of Nazi party, Hitler was rabidly, frantically, frenetically, hysterically anti-socialist.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Jaspers argued that C4 moral failings cause the conditions out of which both crime and political guilt arise."" jurisdiction of moral guilt rests with one's individual conscience. Finally, there is metaphysical guilt, which arises when we transgress against the general moral order and violate the archetypal moral bonds that connect us to each other as human beings.

  1. Assess the impact of Nazi ideology on the Social Classes.

    The German middleclass, particularly the lower middle class of trades people, shopkeepers, clerks and skilled craft workers, were Hitler's most enthusiastic supporters during his rise to power and of all the social divisions it was this mittelstand with whom Hitler most readily identified as he shared their fears hopes and prejudices.

  2. To vote for Hitler was above all a rejection of the existing system. Is ...

    The Nazi Party gained the vote from the German population because it was so different from the leadership and the aims of the Weimar Republic and they were scared to rely too heavily on the Weimar leadership because they feared being lead back into a hyperinflation as seen in 1924.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work