• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Questions based on Russia and her Five-year plans.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

RUSSIA History coursework 1. A part of the five-year plan was collectivisation. This meant that farm workers had to leave their land and go into towns and cities to work in factories. The problem with getting country farm workers to work in factories is that the peasants weren't trained to work with the new machines. The peasants worked according to the weather or seasons. One season when the crops would be ready for picking on the farm land the workers would work very efficiently but when the cold weather came the peasants slackened their work and the factories became inefficient, what they didn't understand is that work could go on in any weather; snow or rain. When the peasants were paid the wages covered the expenses they had and started to become more relaxed and stopped turning up for work. They preferred leisure to work and the wages covered all their necessities. As was said earlier, the peasants weren't trained to work in the factories and not being able to work the machines made accidents happen and the factories became inefficient. They were impossible to train partly because they couldn't read or write and secondly they had never worked these things before in their lives. They were brought up on farms and were never taught how to work such things. ...read more.

Middle

She is saying that the workers were happy with the conditions and what they were doing. She says, 'it was poor conditions but we were happy people.' I have read a source once before which was another worker working on the same thing, the Moscow Metro system. They both say the same things. They say that they were happy to know that they were helping out. This gets me thinking that even these people could be set up to say stuff to get more peasants to work and join. The way they say the exact same things makes it unreliable. On the other side, it could be true because they each say that they are happy to help so they are all thinking the same thing. This source is hard to decide weather it could be useful or not but I think it could be a reliable source because of background knowledge and the facts out in front of me in the source. Next source D, Its said in my answer to question 2 what I think this is. It's a poster and in that case it could be set up, a peace of propaganda to show that Stalin is backing the five-year plan and turning away the church, rich people, etc. ...read more.

Conclusion

In source G it says they made tanks and aircraft and oil production increased, this could prepare Russia for war and they were capable of fighting a war with the resources they had. It says this was done in 1930 so due to my background knowledge they turned the Second World War around. They took out a lot of the German troops and really they won the war for Britain. The people of Russia became a lot happier and 'there seemed to be a sense of excitement and achievement' which is said in source H. This would prepare the men for war because they felt they could help their country. The women after working in the factories were capable of supplying artillery and guns for the war whilst the men were out. It tested and trained the people for war without using military training. In source F it talks about a man who had freedom to choose to change his job. Again they would want to fight for that freedom. People liked Stalin by now for what he had done to make their lives better and building up the country so he would be a strong leader and people would trust him in the time of war. This is shown in source B and D. Source C is an example again of good spirits and sense of achievement. In war this would make people fight because they had something to loose. The five-year plan brought people together. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    Overall, the five year plans put pressure on the workers and forced them to rush the production processes which., in turn, made quality fall and the goods being made were not of a high standard. This was not what Stalin had hoped for and it did not help Russian industry.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    The key turning-point was the battle of Stalingrad. * Stalin left military matters to his generals, in particular Marshal Zhukov. Unlike Hitler he did not constantly interfere. He also stayed in the Kremlin to convince the Soviet people that he believed that the Soviet Union would win.

  1. Joseph Stalin's Economic Plans. Stalin ended Lenin's NEP and set about achieving modernisation ...

    But, on the other hand, life was very harsh under Stalin. Factory discipline was strict and punishments were severe. Lateness or absences were punished by sacking, and that often meant losing your flat or house as well.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    duality of power; it was rather between the dual system and the forces on its periphery". ` `This is a very important point because it illustrates the fact that dual power had become, during the July days, a battle between the masses, pushing for a total adoption of the Soviet system, and the two governmental systems trying to restore order.

  1. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    This means that the plan was obviously working. The idea that Stalin had was that if he could get the most out of the first Plan then he would be ahead of schedule and be able to produce even more for the second and third Plans. But not all of the effects were good; the people that were

  2. Lenin's Russia, source based work.

    When the civil war started Lenin and the reds didn't have any outside allies while the Americans, the French and the British supported the whites. These countries wanted to help the whites against Lenin because Lenin had pulled Russia out of the First World War before it had ended.

  1. Blitzkrieg coursework

    campaigns however not in the Norwegian campaign, where army groups were not used. In Poland Army Groups A North and South and the various armies of which they were comprised encircled Warsaw and combined with the bombardment by the lutwaffe inflicted Warsaw´┐Żs surrender.

  2. Blitzkreig coursework

    Army groups were not deployed in the Norwegian campaign as the main invasion was by sea and air, this was perhaps a contingent factor in the long amount of time that was taken for the German army to occupy Norway in comparison with the much quicker victories in Poland and France.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work