• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Questions on "The use of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Questions on "The use of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki" 1. What are (a) the similarities and (b) the differences (if any) in the justifications given by Byrnes (Source A) and Makins (Source B) for the use of the A-bomb? The similarities between Source A and B are that both authors believe that the United States was under pressure and correct in dropping the bomb. The authors of the sources were Americans that were involved in the decision making whether to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Source A states that, "....Any weapon that could bring an end to the war and save millions of casualties among American boys was justified..." a similar statement appears in Source B stating "Americans were poised for the invasion of Japan and it was estimated that that operation might cost up to a million lives." Both these quotes show justification that that the dropping of the bomb on the two Japanese cities was necessary. The differences between the two sources are that in Source A the author focus's on bringing the war to an end by stating, "It was our duty to bring the war to an end at the earliest possible moment." ...read more.

Middle

The difference in these two sources is that they are written by two different authors who saw this in a complete different way. Leahy saw this from the point of view as the chief of staff to Roosevelt and Truman where as Hart, a historian, saw his perspective years later after he had collected evidence to come up with a conclusion. Leahy states in his source that Japan was ready to surrender due to a number of reasons such as; the sea blockade that the United States had placed in the east, the starvation that had overcome due to war, and also the bombing of regular weapons in the country but scientists wanted to test the Atomic bomb. Hart as a historian states, "But president Truman and most of his chief advisors were now as intent on using the bomb to accelerate Japan's collapse as Stalin was on entering the war against Japan before it ended, in order to gain advantageous position in the Far East." The United States wanted to make sure that Russia did not claim any "spoils" from the war that were to be gained in the Far East. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source G was later written by Hart who was a historian; he was in no way involved with the government and stated his perspective from viewing different sources that were used as evidence. Both Makins and Brynes mention in their articles that the bomb was dropped on Japan to save lives and to end the war in a more effective way. Sources A & B have a biased point of view because of the scenario that they are in, being that both authors were involved with the United States government at the time, and also understanding the issue at first hand. Makins and Brynes know the motivations that the United States government had in dropping the bomb such as keeping Russia away from Far East. Hart on the other hand looks back and states that a strategic reason would have been more important. Also he believes that there was no need to drop the bomb on Japan because they were ready to surrender. In his article he states, "This surrender was already sure..." making this not a personal statement. Hart has the advantage of looking at two biased views and coming up with an objective that suits the situation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    The allies would be faced with the enormous task of destroying a force of five million men and five thousand suicide aircrafts belonging to a race that would fight to the death' - an American secretary for war wrote this in 1947.

  2. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    this was mostly in the form of posters showing the atrocities of destroyed fleet. Many scientists and historians have questioned whether part of Truman's decision to drop the bombs was to test this new type of weapon. A previous nuclear test explosion was conducted in a desert in New Mexico

  1. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    However they were taking a terrible battering from US aeroplanes. Each month 40,000 tons of bombs were dropped onto Japanese cities, 60 cities had half there houses destroyed, 90% of the navy and merchant shipping had been sunk and Honshu (the largest of the 4 main Islands)

  2. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    The reason that Japan did not like this was because they were trying to take China over, and if the Americans helped the Chinese, they (the Japanese) would face tougher opposition. Both American and British Governments had done everything to place obstacles in front of Japan.

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    March 1945, Incendiary bomb were dropped onto the Japanese city of Tokyo, where the lost 80,000 citizens. Overall, throughout the 3 years, the Japanese casualties were high of about 270,000 from bitter fighting, defending territories and incendiary bombs. America really did have other alternatives rather than to use the atomic bombs twice.

  2. History of the United States

    BULL RUN, BATTLES OF), south of Washington, D.C.--resulting in a dramatic southern victory. Thereafter, both sides settled down to a long conflict. It became an immense struggle. With a total U.S. population of fewer than 32 million, the number of dead reached 620,000 (360,000 northerners out of an army of

  1. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    The photographer's name is not given, so we don't know who took the photo. As it the photographer's name is not specified, the photo could have been taken for several reasons. It could have been taken merely to show the elation, from an American point of view, that the war was drawing to end.

  2. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    If they had, one of the available alternatives to the use of the atomic bomb may have been employed. The alternatives existing were a land invasion of the Japanese mainland, or the use of diplomatic negotiations such as modifying the American demand for unconditional surrender or using Russian aid as a threat against Japan.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work