• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Questions on "The use of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Questions on "The use of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki" 1. What are (a) the similarities and (b) the differences (if any) in the justifications given by Byrnes (Source A) and Makins (Source B) for the use of the A-bomb? The similarities between Source A and B are that both authors believe that the United States was under pressure and correct in dropping the bomb. The authors of the sources were Americans that were involved in the decision making whether to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Source A states that, "....Any weapon that could bring an end to the war and save millions of casualties among American boys was justified..." a similar statement appears in Source B stating "Americans were poised for the invasion of Japan and it was estimated that that operation might cost up to a million lives." Both these quotes show justification that that the dropping of the bomb on the two Japanese cities was necessary. The differences between the two sources are that in Source A the author focus's on bringing the war to an end by stating, "It was our duty to bring the war to an end at the earliest possible moment." ...read more.

Middle

The difference in these two sources is that they are written by two different authors who saw this in a complete different way. Leahy saw this from the point of view as the chief of staff to Roosevelt and Truman where as Hart, a historian, saw his perspective years later after he had collected evidence to come up with a conclusion. Leahy states in his source that Japan was ready to surrender due to a number of reasons such as; the sea blockade that the United States had placed in the east, the starvation that had overcome due to war, and also the bombing of regular weapons in the country but scientists wanted to test the Atomic bomb. Hart as a historian states, "But president Truman and most of his chief advisors were now as intent on using the bomb to accelerate Japan's collapse as Stalin was on entering the war against Japan before it ended, in order to gain advantageous position in the Far East." The United States wanted to make sure that Russia did not claim any "spoils" from the war that were to be gained in the Far East. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source G was later written by Hart who was a historian; he was in no way involved with the government and stated his perspective from viewing different sources that were used as evidence. Both Makins and Brynes mention in their articles that the bomb was dropped on Japan to save lives and to end the war in a more effective way. Sources A & B have a biased point of view because of the scenario that they are in, being that both authors were involved with the United States government at the time, and also understanding the issue at first hand. Makins and Brynes know the motivations that the United States government had in dropping the bomb such as keeping Russia away from Far East. Hart on the other hand looks back and states that a strategic reason would have been more important. Also he believes that there was no need to drop the bomb on Japan because they were ready to surrender. In his article he states, "This surrender was already sure..." making this not a personal statement. Hart has the advantage of looking at two biased views and coming up with an objective that suits the situation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    They were to be hit three times as hard as Pearl Harbor with atomic bombs. The Japanese would not surrender. 'There was no weakening the Japanese determination to fight. The total strength if the Japanese army was about five million men.

  2. Why did hitler bomb british cities?

    so they set up the ministries, to do things sensor the media and create propaganda. During a time of war, the government's role is to keep the country going. During war, the government is the brains of the country, commanding everything to do what it's meant to and taking in and processing information.

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    The fact that the atomic bombs were already produced by the time President Harry Truman was President gave President Truman an obligation to use the atomic bombs. Scientists strongly suggested that they could have just given Japan a big warning by demonstrating the power atomic bomb.

  2. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    However they were taking a terrible battering from US aeroplanes. Each month 40,000 tons of bombs were dropped onto Japanese cities, 60 cities had half there houses destroyed, 90% of the navy and merchant shipping had been sunk and Honshu (the largest of the 4 main Islands)

  1. Argue either for or against this statement, "President Truman's decision to drop the bombs ...

    the ending of the war and save lives, not to cause pain and agony; thus, making Truman's decision in dropping the bomb justified. Truman was also justified according to legal international laws. America and Japan were in a state of war and in a state of war, there is only one victor.

  2. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    out of Asian Affairs and 3 The Americans would lift the oil embargo on Japan, and commence trading straight away. President Roosevelt did not acknowledge any of these proposals, and dismissed them. Historian's debate that the reason Japan had bombed Pearl Harbor was merely due to the fact that President

  1. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    were put out of action and nearly two hundred aircraft were destroyed. Over two thousand Americans were killed, the Japanese returned with the loss of just twenty-nine of their three hundred and eight four aircraft. It is though that the time of the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima at

  2. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    These letters would have made people feel very against Vietnam as they revealed how things were not going well at all. They also showed how miserable many of the soldiers were. Source K and L show the negative attitudes towards Vietnam, Source K is a song that shows how people felt Vietnam was pointless and should not be happening.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work