• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20

Rationality, Educated Opinion and Peace

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Teong Yi Heong U021202J ISM Report Dr. Alan Chong 31 March 2004 Rationality, Educated Opinion and Peace The belief in progress Abstract: This paper addresses the relevance of interwar thought to the building of peace through examining the ideas of three important writers of the period: Edward Hallett Carr, Norman Angell and Alfred Zimmern. The role of public opinion was under much query in the politics of the period they wrote in, and crucial to this issue are the questions as to whether the public mind is rational and capable of reason. These writers are concerned with the influence of public opinion and believe that through educating the public mind, the possibility of peace can be increased. Drawing from their ideas, this paper thus postulates that peace is a product of rationality and there is possibility of progress through education. The birth of international relations as a separate discipline was founded against the context of the interwar years, which brought about important consequences for the subsequent development of the interwar years. The tensions prior to and the subsequent devastation of the Great War forced intellectuals of the early twentieth century to seek explanations for the causes of war and to postulate measures by which another catastrophe could be prevented. The general psyche of the people exerted an influence on the direction of international studies. As David Long points out, the academic study of international affairs during this period of time possessed "a normative though not necessarily utopian interest in the avoidance of war"1. Such a trend is manifested in the trust deed of the Wilson Chair of International Politics (one of the first few schools of the discipline), which states that international politics is the "political science in its application to international relations with special reference to the best means of promoting peace between nations."2 Woodrow Wilson, being a leading statesman at the time, presents one of the possible avenues for peace. ...read more.

Middle

Not only does war not serve to the benefit of the state concerned, better alternatives of action could be sought such as building economic relations, social interaction. Such connections can be used in persuading, as opposed to coercing, other states into behaving in the manner that is beneficial to the state concerned. Thus the argument adopted is that war is irrational, i.e. not the best-laid option, and man being irrational and susceptible to external influences, chooses to use war as a policy instrument. Andreas Osiander points out that "unlike what Carr implies, Zimmern, like Angell, was very far from seeing public opinion as necessarily a force for peace.25" Like Angell, he believes that the conflicts in the international arena, giving rise to war are resultant of intellectual, and not political failure.26 However, if Carr is to be believed, Zimmern can, in fact, be seen as being more extreme than Angell. Carr states in The Twenty Years Crisis that Zimmern is inclined towards the hypothesis that "If mankind in its international relations has signally failed to achieve the rational good, it must ... have been too stupid to understand that good." Carr's statement is not altogether justified. Although Zimmern does point out that the impediment to overcoming the obstacle towards peace is that man "are beings of conservative temper and limited intelligence27", what he implies is that man is reluctant to adjust to present realities brought by modernity. As a result of the inherent resistance towards change, man's mental capacity does not adapt to the fact that previous ways of managing international relations are no longer applicable. Consequentially, public opinion cannot be trusted to be rational. Zimmern subscribes to John Stuart Mill's argument of the "tyranny of the majority". He argues that the ruling elite, that is, the politicians in positions of power tend to be capable of rationalization. However this intellectual minority in government is consumed by the irrational public: "for statesmen, however wise and far sighted, are limited in their policies by the public opinion and parliaments to which they are responsible.28" Angell concurs on this issue. ...read more.

Conclusion

The argument is made in line with Robert Jervis theory on international behaviour in his "Cooperation Under Security Dilemma" World Politics. Vol. 30, No. 2 (Jan, 1978), pp.167-214. 20 Stephen van Evera, "Why co-operation failed in 1914". World Politics, Vol. 38. No. 1 (Oct, 1985). p. 81 21 Christian Reus-Smit, "The Strange Death of Liberal International Theory". European Journal of International Law. Vol. 12. No. 3. pp. 578-9. 22 J. D. Miller. Norman Angell and the Futility of War: Peace and the public mind. London: Macmillian: 1986. pp/ 124-125. 23 Norman Angell. Peace and the Public mind. para. 17 24 Norman Angell. Europe's Optical Illusion. London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent , 1909(?)24-40; The Great Illusion:A study of the relation of military power to national advantage. London: William Heinemann 1913. pp. 26-40. 25 Andreas Osiander, "Rereading Early Twentieth Century IR theory" p. 417 26 Alfred Zimmern, Learning and Leadership. p. 11. 27 Alfred Zimmern, "The Problem with Collective Security" (ed) Q. Wright. Neutrality and Collective Security. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 1936. p. 8. 28 Ibid. 29 E. H. Carr, "Public Opinion as a Safeguard of Peace". p. 854. 30 E. H. Carr. The Twenty Years Crisis. pp. 208-223 31 Alfred Zimmern Learning and Leadership. p. 22 32 Norman Angell, The Great Illusion. 1913. pp. 200-221. 33 Alfred Zimmern, "The Decline of International Standards"International Affiars (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1931-1939). Vol 17. No. 1 (Jan.-Feb. 1938), p. 21. 34 Norman Angell, The Great Illusion. P. 327 35 Norman Angell, "Popular Education and International Affairs" International Affairs (Royal Institute of International affairs 1931-1939) Vol. 11, No. 3 (May 1932), p. 323 36 Ibid, p 335-338, 338 37 Alfred Zimmern Learning and Leadership. p. 26-60 38 E. H. Carr. What is History? New York , St. Martin's Press , 1961 p 190 39 Ibid. 40 Ibid p. 195. Propaganda is associated with the emotive and not with reason. 41 E. H. Carr. "Public Opinion as a Safeguard of Peace". p. 861. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * President Brezhnev announced that the Soviet Union 'had responded to an urgent request from the Kabul government for help'. Barbrak Kamal became the new president. Soviet involvement in Afghanistan Why did the Soviet Union invade Afghanistan? * In 1978 a Marxist government had come to power in Afghanistan and

  2. Canada's Defining Moments.

    This attack eventually led to Germany's surrender. In April and May 1945, Canadians struggled to free the Dutch from the Germans. Canadian soldiers made huge sacrifices in order to liberate the Netherlands. After the liberation of the Netherlands, "Canadians soldiers were welcomed with kisses and flowers by the grateful Dutch in 1945," (Newman, P.239).

  1. To What Extent Can The Term ‘Appeasement’ Be Applied To British Foreign Policy In ...

    It was flexible and pragmatic. Basically some problems were confronted whilst others were ignored. Britain seemed to drift along accepting events such as Manchuria, Abyssinia, German rearmament and the Rhineland occupation. Here is an example of simply accepting rather than negotiation and diplomacy, not really what appeasement entails.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    In the context of Soviet-American relations in 1946, the result was predictable-the genie of the atomic arms race would remain outside the bottle. Not all influential Americans were "pleased by the growing polarization. Averell Harriman, who a year earlier had been in the forefront of those demanding a hard-line position from Truman, now pulled back somewhat.

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    * 1,400 flights occurred on one day. * 79 American British and Germans died in accidents. * The Airlift cost $100,000,000. In May 1949, Stalin called off the blockade. Why did Stalin's blockade fail? Stalin seriously underestimated the determination of the Western Allies to resist Soviet pressure.

  2. Dtente, meaning and definition.

    As a matter of fact it was visible prominently not only in Soviet-American relations but also Sino-American relations. On the other hand Soviet scholars kozyrev and Nilov say, "D�tente opens up favorable prospect for international cooperation on the sold basis of peaceful co-existence of state with different social system".

  1. During the course of this essay I will be investigating a play called 'All ...

    he knew what he was doing was wrong but there was so much pressure on him to get those cylinder parts out, people were shouting left, right and centre looking the deliveries that he had no choice but to send them on out in the hope that they would be okay and know one would notice they were faulty.

  2. Was Woodrow Wilson right to be a disappointed man when he died?

    He did not invoke it publicly though because it was a republican and showed that he was getting directly involved in foreign affairs as much as a republican president would, which was not what he should be doing as a democrat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work