• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reasons For the Outcome of World War 1.

Extracts from this document...


Reasons For the Outcome of World War 1 There are many reasons to explain why the allies won the war and the central powers lost it. The allies in the end had far more advantages over the central powers. I've looked at several of the main features of the war like land warfare, sea warfare, air warfare and the home front. In all of these the allies gained the upper hand either technologically, or in the case of the home front through determination. In land warfare despite the early failures and casualties the allies were more aggressive in their attacks. They were more determined to win the war than the Germans. ...read more.


One of the main advantages for the allies was that the war was a total war and so the home front played a crucial part in determining the outcome of it. Every nation had to mobilise its economy as well as its army for war. The side that was governed the best and had efficient infrastructure to cope with the demands of war would win. Britain and France had this, as did Germany. But with the help of their propaganda against the Germans bad for a better world the allies, especially the Brits, gained superiority. Women were prepared to work long hours in arms factories for not very good pay just as long as the allies won. ...read more.


From then on the Germans were always up against it. As soon the French had support from the British who they had under estimated like the French. France had been expected to be in Germany's control within 6 months of the war starting. Another mistake by Germany was with its U-boat campaign. It was working well at first but when the American ships and civilians were attacked by the U-boats America entered the war on the ally's side. From my research I've seen that the British were extremely important in winning the war for the allies. They had good technology, an efficient army, a good air force, and excellent navy, and a determined home front that was well governed. The central powers though were not quite as efficient and made too many mistakes during the course of the war which led to their down fall. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    'If the battle of the Somme had no great importance in the strategic sense, its consequences nevertheless were great', this basically means that Haig got lucky. 'The principle that guided him was if he could kill more Germans than the Germans could kill his men, then he would at same time win the war'.

  2. Why did the Central Powers lose theFirst World War?

    - Manchester Guardian (22nd October, 1914). The German instruction to retreat was given on the 9th of September by Von Molkte. Ultimately the Schlieffen plan had been a mild failure, one which stunned the German Military. However all was not lost for the Germans; they would later dig themselves in,

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    The German capital Berlin was similarly divided into four zones. At the outset neither side had any firm or concrete plans for the future of Germany apart from a desire for some form of reparations by the Soviet Union and on the Anglo/ American side a deep desire to avoid

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Additionally, MNF II was assigned the task of assisting the Lebanese Army in restoring the authority of the central government over Beirut. The United States dispatched a contingent of 1,400 men, France 1,500, and Italy 1,400. A relatively small British contingent of about 100 men was added in January 1983,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work